ringofpower

[Dread The Undead]

Good model!

 

[Digfa]

Good but what are the paths :?:

 

[Insane llama]

LOTR ring?

 

[olofmoleman]

the markings on the ring are incorrect.

 

[Cenurick_Druidhorn]

Not bad but the Mordor runes could have been done better

 

[Wolverabid]

(9) An outstanding model. Highly recommended.

 

[Commentor]

Too Big for an item

 

[Cretix]

Love the model,but the size is a little big,but still AWSOME model,anyway 9.99/10 (- .01 cause of file size).

 

[Deathager]

Outrageous big.1391 KB OMG this is not a model.This i a whole map 6/10 (4=size)

 

[Aeroblyctos]

Very nice model indeed. But because of the file size I have to drop from 10 to 2. I'm not gonna use this in any of my maps. Hell too big file size.

 

[Archangel_Tidusx]

This is a really nice looking model... but 1300Kb?! not for me lol

 

[Sorenkj]

lol ..

the markings on the ring are incorrect.

Seriously... marks are incorrect... you've expected him to make a 100% quality ring from LOTR with 100% correct writtens? people dont even notice stuff like that...

 

[BanananaHead]

Wow...can you make an attatchment outta that? PLEASE?!?!?!

 

[Sorenkj]

the markings on the ring are incorrect.

Loool, who the hell cares about that...

 

[Parrothead]

That's the biggest file size for an attachment I've ever seen! This could be done and probably have less then 100 kb.

 

[HappyTauren]

dudes, ever heard of compression? Also you can resize the textures from 512X512 to 256X256 or even 128X128

 

[Frost_Mourne]

the markings on the ring are incorrect.

Hi I'm new to Hiveworkshop and yet I've seen a lot of stuff by Olofmoleman that PWNS I also know that Olof doesn't take requests but you think you could make a one ring Olof? I've seen your Nazgul rider and it rocks!

 

[Dinodin]

It's to big! Make it smaller

 

[Falconeye]

Lol import this and garentee another 3O seconds of download per player. 1/5

 

[Miaow567]

Not bad but the Mordor runes could have been done better

Theyre Elven runes

 

[Falconeye]

Theyre Elven runes

Um no he's right they are mordor runes and btw whether or not they are from mordor or an elvish settlement like Imladris, the runes are still incorrect.

 

[Killjaes]

Hey dude.What are you doing with sauron's ring?He needs his ring!give him his ring so he can pay me a hamburguer at macdonalds

 

[Licheus]

Cool model. The filesize is big because it's The One Ring, all the power can't just disappear you know. ;-)
Haha, no, please fix the filesize and it'll be outstanding.

 

[grondo-lamer]

Theyre Elven runes

http://folk.uib.no/hnohf/blackspeech.htm
Here is the corpus of all Black Speech quotations:
Ash nazg durbatulûk, ash nazg gimbatul,
ash nazg thrakatulûk agh burzum-ishi krimpatul

(One ring to rule them all, one ring to find them,
one ring to bring them all, and in the darkness bind them)
It isn't elven.
It's black speech!
http://gallery.mudpuddle.co.nz/d/14026-2/OneRing.jpg

 

[Luffy_299]

olofmoleman was right.Markings arent corect.

 

[BLKS]

isnt filesize too big for ring model ?

 

[Soul-_-Hunter]

My precious...

 

[rukas90]

nice model!!! 5/5

 

[cxswdtd]

so interesting

 

[_Guhun_]

http://folk.uib.no/hnohf/blackspeech.htm
Here is the corpus of all Black Speech quotations:
Ash nazg durbatulûk, ash nazg gimbatul,
ash nazg thrakatulûk agh burzum-ishi krimpatul

(One ring to rule them all, one ring to find them,
one ring to bring them all, and in the darkness bind them)
It isn't elven.
It's black speech!
http://gallery.mudpuddle.co.nz/d/14026-2/OneRing.jpg

You are right, in a way. The language being used IS the language of Mordor, but it is written in elvish script.

We can then conclude that the person who said they were elven runes was right aswell.
(Yes, I do love LoTR)

 

[Horselord12]

Cool model. File size is big, but awesome and really useful!
Used in my map.

 

[Dinodin]

Omg I just love this model but one problem, it's way TO BIG file size! Pls make it smaller..

 

[Fingolfin]

Yeah lol, 128x128 AT LEAST!! You could even have come very far with ingame textures, or with one texture instead of three. Just PLEASE fix this, because this model is otherwise very useful.

 

[Moises08x]

Good model!

 

[Gumberbunbder]

This is a fine model. Very helpful for us LOTR boys.

 

[tillinghast]

i have to question what is the point of messing with these old models and changing their approval status
RightField was last online in 2019, but last time he posted was in 2005, he's not gonna appear and fix the model

is misisng stand and death sequence

it does not prevent model from disappearing when a hero picks it up which is the only thing that matters imo

the particle emitter expands too much outward. Maybe shrink it or replace it with another effect or remove it

they do persist for too long but they are rare enough that it's not a big deal
if it's supposed to be "the one ring" then it should be eye-catching

"awaiting update" does not show for people by default and this model shouldn't be hidden in there
old models shouldn't be judged by modern standards

 

[Footman16]

i have to question what is the point of messing with these old models and changing their approval status

So that users get an accurate representation of the quality and standards of a given model.

RightField was last online in 2019, but last time he posted was in 2005, he's not gonna appear and fix the model

This is true, I have been open to fixing textures in the skins section before. Edits that simply optimise and make no artistic change to a model I would be open to updating the bundle on behalf of an author who is no longer active.

"awaiting update" does not show for people by default and this model shouldn't be hidden in there

People can change their default viewing settings.

old models shouldn't be judged by modern standards

I disagree, we can definitely re-look at older works and give users an accurate representation of how those models will work for them in a modern context. Users need to be able to trust that when they download a resource it will work as expected and be held to a particular set of standards or is indicated otherwise if it won't.

 

[deepstrasz]

This is true, I have been open to fixing textures in the skins section before. Edits that simply optimise and make no artistic change to a model I would be open to updating the bundle on behalf of an author who is no longer active.

And if no one comes along eventually? Will it remain in limbo?

I disagree, we can definitely re-look at older works and give users an accurate representation of how those models will work for them in a modern context. Users need to be able to trust that when they download a resource it will work as expected and be held to a particular set of standards or is indicated otherwise if it won't.

Just not those whose texture paths, for instance, have been broken by Blizzard updates?

 

[Footman16]

And if no one comes along eventually? Will it remain in limbo?

Preferably not.

Just not those whose texture paths, for instance, have been broken by Blizzard updates?

You are free to use the Suggest Moderation button on textures.

 

[deepstrasz]

Preferably not.

Well, once in Awaiting Update, who will regularly check, model mods/reviewers or are you up for a whole resources forum management?

You are free to use the Suggest Moderation button on textures.

I mean, these should not get in Awaiting Update but if "fixed" then that's good keeping in mind they will not work on older patches anymore unless there will be both paths added.

 

[Footman16]

Well, once in Awaiting Update, who will regularly check, model mods/reviewers or are you up for a whole resources forum management?

Well this is the idea of the suggest moderation button, that regular users can see if an old resource has the wrong tags for example and suggest it so we can fix it.

I mean, these should not get in Awaiting Update but if "fixed" then that's good keeping in mind they will not work on older patches anymore unless there will be both paths added.

Multiple paths can be added to textures. Not all suggestions come with a suggested moderation, you can suggest just changing the texture path.

 

[General Frank]

Well, once in Awaiting Update, who will regularly check, model mods/reviewers or are you up for a whole resources forum management?

I mean, these should not get in Awaiting Update but if "fixed" then that's good keeping in mind they will not work on older patches anymore unless there will be both paths added.

I'd like add if I am allowed to that a proper course should be taken before any re-moderation of already approved resources takes place.
If the model still works in-game and gives no huge bugs there and current moderation should stay as is. Things like unneeded sequences or materials should be the last thing to look after. Remember we did not have sanity checker 20 years ago.

I don't want to get bullied if a resource of mine is slightly not perfect, though I will listen to improve if it is said in a nice way.

 

[Footman16]

I'd like add if I am allowed to

Why wouldn't you be allowed to?

that a proper course should be taken before any re-moderation of already approved resources takes place.

Sure it's a new system and we're still trying to iron out the kinks and figure out how it should work. Site Discussion is always open to people's feedback and suggestions.

If the model still works in-game and gives no huge bugs there and current moderation should stay as is. Things like unneeded sequences or materials should be the last thing to look after. Remember we did not have sanity checker 20 years ago.

I think moderation should always be open to another look, even positive changes like an old model that deserves High Quality or nomination for DC should definitely be looked at even if it's 20 years old.

I don't want to get bullied if a resource of mine is slightly not perfect, though I will listen to improve if it is said in a nice way.

I'm not sure I've observed any bullying. We can check and edit the text of a suggested moderation before we approve it.

 

[General Frank]

I'm not sure I've observed any bullying. We can check and edit the text of a suggested moderation before we approve it.

I admit, because I have done that in the past to some people. It's shitty and I feel really bad about it and honestly, I am sorry I did that to people.
I have no doubt that some people might do the same to be now.

I think moderation should always be open to another look, even positive changes like an old model that deserves High Quality or nomination for DC should definitely be looked at even if it's 20 years old.

That sounds good, but a bit too wishy-washy.

Sure it's a new system and we're still trying to iron out the kinks and figure out how it should work. Site Discussion is always open to people's feedback and suggestions.

I would like to think that the author of the re-moderated model always has the last word. Since uploaders would be pretty peeved if they get stepped over.

 

[Footman16]

I admit, because I have done that in the past to some people. It's shitty and I feel really bad about it and honestly, I am sorry I did that to people.
I have no doubt that some people might do the same to be now.

Well as I said we can edit or reject the suggestions and the text associated with them, so I don't think any bullying will occur unless we allow it to pass.

That sounds good, but a bit too wishy-washy.

Wdym? Pretty sure you can literally suggest models for HQ unless I'm mistaken?

I would like to think that the author of the re-moderated model always has the last word. Since uploaders would be pretty peeved if they get stepped over.

I don't think uploaders get any say in the moderation of their resources outside of being able to update their resource or delete it if they so wish. I don't know in what way uploaders are getting stepped over.

Also I think this discussion should be in Site Discussion at this point rather than in a random resource thread.