Melee Spellbreaker (Open Source)

[rukisama]

I always waiting for the melee version of Spellbreaker since a long time, great thanks for this

 

[Mr Ogre man]

This'd be perfect if, instead, these were -alternate animations or -one/ -two animations (for example, if people want a unit that wants to attack melee vs infantry and ranged vs air units). I don't think it'd be hard to implement, either.

 

[Ardenaso]

This'd be perfect if, instead, these were -alternate animations or -one/ -two animations (for example, if people want a unit that wants to attack melee vs infantry and ranged vs air units). I don't think it'd be hard to implement, either.

hmm like siege engines? shouldn't be hard to implement

 

[Ardenaso]

Update: added ranged attacks, just refer to the post on how to use either melee and/or ranged attack

 

[Mr Ogre man]

Moving it to fixed models; if you guys think I should move it back, tell me so.

 

[Mr Ogre man]

You forgot to add the blurred weapon geoset that appears when it rotates.

 

[Ardenaso]

oh shit lmao

gonna fix that tomorrow

 

[Ardenaso]

done

also added stand channel

 

[Mr Ogre man]

Only issue that remains is that he should be ranged in Attack One and melee in Attack Two and not the other way around, that way you can easily replace the existing model in your folder without worrying in melee maps.

 

[Ardenaso]

aight should be an easy fix again tomorrow

 

[Ardenaso]

Only issue that remains is that he should be ranged in Attack One and melee in Attack Two and not the other way around, that way you can easily replace the existing model in your folder without worrying in melee maps.

alright, done !

 

[fllwr9141]

It doesn't really matter.
Because wc3 always picks Attack1 for overlapping target filter, Attack1/2 is not swappable.
Users have to ensure animation names anyway.

Only issue that remains is that he should be ranged in Attack One and melee in Attack Two and not the other way around, that way you can easily replace the existing model in your folder without worrying in melee maps.

 

[Ardenaso]

It doesn't really matter.
Because wc3 always picks Attack1 for overlapping target filter, Attack1/2 is not swappable.
Users have to ensure animation names anyway.

it's different here, Attack One uses the Attack 1 in the Object Editor, Attack One uses the Attack 2 in the Object Editor

it functions exactly the same as how the Siege Engine attacks

 

[fllwr9141]

it's different here, Attack One uses the Attack 1 in the Object Editor, Attack One uses the Attack 2 in the Object Editor

it functions exactly the same as how the Siege Engine attacks

We are talking the same thing.
1. Object Editor Attack1/2 is not equivalent/swappable, because if both Attack1/2 can apply to a target, wc3 always uses Attack1.
So Attack1 must be the default/preferred attack.
2. Object Editor Attack1/2 uses animation tag One/Two, the only way to change it is rename animation.
3. So if both attacks are to be used, 50% condition User need to swap animation anme of Attack One/Two depending on which melee or ranged attack must be the default one.

 

[Ardenaso]

We are talking the same thing.
1. Object Editor Attack1/2 is not equivalent/swappable, because if both Attack1/2 can apply to a target, wc3 always uses Attack1.
So Attack1 must be the default/preferred attack.
2. Object Editor Attack1/2 uses animation tag One/Two, the only way to change it is rename animation.
3. So if both attacks are to be used, 50% condition User need to swap animation anme of Attack One/Two depending on which melee or ranged attack must be the default one.

idk it works properly for me when I set One to attack only ranged and Two to melee