• 🏆 Texturing Contest #33 is OPEN! Contestants must re-texture a SD unit model found in-game (Warcraft 3 Classic), recreating the unit into a peaceful NPC version. 🔗Click here to enter!
  • It's time for the first HD Modeling Contest of 2024. Join the theme discussion for Hive's HD Modeling Contest #6! Click here to post your idea!

In-Depth Reviews: The Sequel

Status
Not open for further replies.
Level 13
Joined
Feb 28, 2007
Messages
477
Original Thread Here

This is the summer continuation of the original map review thread (the first on Hive, iirc, since after mine came many others, but I never noticed any beforehand). This time, I have a new review system and a much different policy on handling reviews.

Code:
[B][U]Review Bank[/U][/B] (by rank)
[COLOR=#ffffff]Old[/COLOR] [COLOR=#ff99cc]Less Old[/COLOR] [COLOR=#ffcc00]New[/COLOR]

[URL="http://www.hiveworkshop.com/forums/1191253-post20.html"][COLOR=#ffcc00]Brotherhood of Kenji[/COLOR][/URL]: [B]A-[/B]
[URL="http://www.hiveworkshop.com/forums/1180940-post4.html"][COLOR=#ffcc00]Warlock[/COLOR][/URL]: [B]A-[/B]
[URL="http://www.hiveworkshop.com/forums/739438-post111.html"][COLOR=#ffffff]Tetris[/COLOR][/URL]: [B]A-[/B] (4.31)
[URL="http://www.hiveworkshop.com/forums/1196814-post51.html"][COLOR=#ffcc00]Symbiote[/COLOR][/URL]: [B]B+[/B]
[URL="http://www.hiveworkshop.com/forums/730586-post88.html"][COLOR=#ffffff]DotA: Allstars[/COLOR][/URL]: [B]B[/B] (3.88)
[URL="http://www.hiveworkshop.com/forums/745134-post135.html"][COLOR=#ffffff]Cannon Defense[/COLOR][/URL]: [B]B[/B] (3.88)
[URL="http://www.hiveworkshop.com/forums/972273-post182.html"][COLOR=#ff99cc]Unmercy Balls[/COLOR][/URL]: [B]B[/B] (3.70)
[URL="http://www.hiveworkshop.com/forums/729109-post72.html"][COLOR=#ffffff]Invoker War[/COLOR][/URL]: [B]C+[/B] (3.35)
[URL="http://www.hiveworkshop.com/forums/720850-post22.html"][COLOR=#ffffff]The Zre Diamond[/COLOR][/URL]: [B]C+[/B] (3.35)
[URL="http://www.hiveworkshop.com/forums/751792-post148.html"][COLOR=#ffffff]Dread Wars[/COLOR][/URL]: [B]C[/B] (3.15)
[URL="http://www.hiveworkshop.com/forums/1189650-post16.html"][COLOR=#ffcc00]Summoning Arena[/COLOR][/URL]: [B]C[/B]
[COLOR=#ffcc00]Pimp My Nigger[/COLOR]: [B]C-[/B]
[URL="http://www.hiveworkshop.com/forums/1194505-post38.html"][COLOR=#ffcc00]Greed and Glory[/COLOR][/URL]: [B]D+[/B]
[URL="http://www.hiveworkshop.com/forums/719138-post11.html"][COLOR=#ffffff]Galactic Conquest[/COLOR][/URL]: [B]D+[/B] (2.55)
[URL="http://www.hiveworkshop.com/forums/969981-post167.html"][COLOR=#ff99cc]Defense of Armengar[/COLOR][/URL]: [B]D+[/B] (2.55)
[URL="http://www.hiveworkshop.com/forums/729422-post77.html"][COLOR=#ffffff]Random AoS[/COLOR][/URL]: [B]D[/B] (2.30)
[URL="http://www.hiveworkshop.com/forums/718891-post5.html"][COLOR=#ffffff]Police Catch Thief[/COLOR][/URL]: [B]D[/B] (2.24)
[URL="http://www.hiveworkshop.com/forums/737254-post97.html"][COLOR=#ffffff]spiceant Succes Training[/COLOR][/URL]: [B]D[/B] (2.20)
[URL="http://www.hiveworkshop.com/forums/720683-post19.html"][COLOR=#ffffff]Eternity of Azjol-Nerub[/COLOR][/URL]: [B]D[/B] (2.10)
[URL="http://www.hiveworkshop.com/forums/1198274-post54.html"][COLOR=#ffcc00]Bille's Ninja Wars[/COLOR][/URL]: [B]D[/B]
[URL="http://www.hiveworkshop.com/forums/725254-post45.html"][COLOR=#ffffff]WarCraft Maul[/COLOR][/URL]: [B]D-[/B] (1.83)
[URL="http://www.hiveworkshop.com/forums/726881-post52.html"][COLOR=#ffffff]Stargate: The New Conflict[/COLOR][/URL]: [B]F-[/B] (1.05)
[URL="http://www.hiveworkshop.com/forums/737401-post99.html"][COLOR=#ffffff]Iblis' Rule[/COLOR][/URL]: [B]X[/B] (1.00)
[URL="http://www.hiveworkshop.com/forums/723733-post36.html"][COLOR=#ffffff]Halo Battle Grounds[/COLOR][/URL]: [B]X[/B] (1.00)
[URL="http://www.hiveworkshop.com/forums/1194505-post38.html"][COLOR=#ffcc00]Digimon ORPG[/COLOR][/URL]: [B]F-[/B]

[URL="http://www.hiveworkshop.com/forums/1194505-post38.html"][COLOR=#ffcc00](Digimon ORPG Video Review)[/COLOR][/URL]
Code:
[B][U]Waiting Line[/U][/B] (by date)
Nightsong Operatives: [I]Queued[/I]
Oblivion map: [I]Queued[/I]
EPIC TD: [I]Rejected[/I]

Rules

1. Only users with 0 or higher reputation (no negrep users) are eligible to request a map.
2. You must have either at least 25 posts OR 5 reputation to request a map.
3. Users with 50 or more posts AND 10 or more reputation can request that their own map be reviewed; otherwise you may only request a map someone else made.
4. I will decide which maps to review. If I don't feel like playing it, there's no way you could possibly force me to do otherwise.
5. Do not whine if your map is reviewed and given a bad score. I will PM the owner of each requested map if possible, telling the owner that their map might be reviewed. The owner is able to deny the review at any time before it is posted.
6. Multiple requests for the same map (from different people) will bump the map up the queue so it will be reviewed sooner.



Link to the map
Pimp%20My%20Nigger%20%28RR%29.png

Review updated...

Ratings
Fun (X/10)
Enjoyment (X/4): How enjoyable playing the map is. This is extremely important.
Thrill (X/2): How well the map can get your heart pumping, or at least interested.
X-Factor (X/3): The charm/epicness and memorable-ness of the map. This can make a huge difference.
Coolness (X/1): How cool the map is. This is a general term. Getting a low score here means the map is awkward.

Gameplay (X/10)
Balancing (X/2): How even the map is. If a specific object or player has a stupid advantage/disadvantage, this score will be low.
Replayability (X/4): VERY important - this is the measure of how slowly the map gets old.
Dynamics (X/2): How well the map varies its play and keeps it relevant, effective, and such.
Flow/Progression (X/2): How well the map's flow of gameplay (things leading to victory or defeat) works. This score also includes how well the map gives a sense of progression, from start to finish.

Originality (X/5)
Freshness (X/2): How fresh the map's take on the genre is. If it creates a new genre, this score will almost certainly be the full 2 or higher.
Novelty (X/1): Does the map add something to the genre? Not getting a 1 or higher here is a bad sign. Unoriginal maps, especially clones, will have highly negative numbers here.
Creativity (X/2): Does the map take advantage of its position by introducing the greatest variety it can get away with? If so, this score will be high.

Polish (X/5)
Quality (X/2): How well put-together the map is.
Optimization (X/1): If the map runs badly, this score will be low.
Immersion (X/2): Does the map make you definitely feel "in the game"? If so, this score will be high.

Scoring: Fun and Gameplay are out of 10, while Polish and Originality are out of 5. There are a total 14 subcategories, each with various maximum scores that add up to make the category score. These sub-categories can have scores above their maximum if the game is unusually excellent in that area, and their scores can go below 0 if they are the map is unbelievably awful in said area. The bug level is simply a number from 0-10 of how bad the bugs were in the game. Lower numbers are generally a count, larger numbers are an approximation because I will lose count by then. If the bugs are just unbelievably ridiculous, I'll add a SECOND layer to the bug level bar so that the number will go to 11-20, and so on. A map receiving a bug level of 20 is pretty much unplayable, anyways. The three checkboxes are basic qualities of the map I'm looking for. It must not cause crashes (doesn't count if its a generic WC3 crash - it has to be a reproducible crash in order to count against you), it must have credits, and you must be able to reach a reasonable victory/defeat, or victory/defeat box (finishing the map) through normal gameplay. If you're missing one of the checkboxes, your score will be severely impacted. If you're missing more than one, I will not grade the map at all. Merits and Demerits go below the checkboxes, and will change based on the map. Some only have one level, some have two, and a couple have up to three levels of quality/awfulness. The section also expands to hold greater amounts of merits and demerits, if needed. The final grade of the map is shown through an "experience bar"-like graphic, and a letter grade. This ranges from F- to A+, and then to S for maps that are ridiculously good and receive well over the regular maximum score. Sadly, I don't think that I will ever get to use S.

Edit: Added maximum scores to the review images, changes max grade to S from R.
 
Last edited:
Level 13
Joined
Feb 28, 2007
Messages
477
I've got 12 weeks of time to do this...

Last time, when I had no time to do reviews, I got swamped with half a dozen per day, yet this time when I can actually do some, nobody seems it's worth their time. The reason I don't want people to request their own map (unless they're a regular user) is that I don't enjoy playing Joe's NiggerMaul. I'd rather play maps that had real value and effort put into them. By requesting someone else's map, it assures that someone would enjoy the review, and that the map would more than likely be competent. You can request a friend's map, certainly, so long as you have the required 50 posts or 5 rep (very easy requirement).

Edit: Example review updated to reflect my actual thoughts.
 
Last edited:
Level 31
Joined
May 3, 2008
Messages
3,155
Ok, since you have no request. I make request for you. I am running out of idea for battle cinematic anyway.

Brotherhood Of Kenji
The Confrontation

I have a few question though.

1) Why no you review those map at map section? It could prove to be helpful even though there is a few map reviewer exist at map section.
3. You may only request a map that someone else made, without your direct input (if you appear as a map author/benefactor, you cannot request the map). Only established users with 500 or more posts AND 50 or more reputation can request that their own map be reviewed, and even then reviews will be at my discretion.

2) Don't you think 500 was rather high? Maybe because that is the reason why nobody make request? As far as I know, only new user are the one who often seek for helpful review.

3) Why not make a rating of 5 out of 5 just like hive, it could be helpful as well.
 
Level 8
Joined
Dec 1, 2006
Messages
342
I would like if you could review my map, Greed and Glory. The link to it is in my sig. It's not 100% done, but the basics, and more actually is finished, and it's in a playable state, so I would like very much for an in-depth review. Please be as harsh as you can, I could use a neutral person's opinion.
 
Level 3
Joined
Aug 29, 2004
Messages
57
What Septimus said is true. I wish I could request other maps to be reviewed, but I can't according to your rules. I am something of a map tester myself, and there are many that deserve more exposure.
 
Level 31
Joined
May 3, 2008
Messages
3,155
I would like if you could review my map, Greed and Glory. The link to it is in my sig. It's not 100% done, but the basics, and more actually is finished, and it's in a playable state, so I would like very much for an in-depth review. Please be as harsh as you can, I could use a neutral person's opinion.

Read his rules before you ask for review.
 
Level 8
Joined
Dec 1, 2006
Messages
342
You mean this:
3. You may only request a map that someone else made, without your direct input (if you appear as a map author/benefactor, you cannot request the map). Only established users with 500 or more posts AND 50 or more reputation can request that their own map be reviewed, and even then reviews will be at my discretion.

Well, this sucks. I thought as there were not that many maps he is reviewing he would have time and want to review mine.
Never mind then, sorry.
 
Level 6
Joined
Dec 9, 2007
Messages
208
Would be nice if you would look at my map (link in sign). It does not contain AI yet, so it's mostly enjoyable online/LAN. If you got any tips after trying I would like to hear them aswell :)

Thanks
-Sinizi
 
Level 13
Joined
Feb 28, 2007
Messages
477
Another Review

It seems gamestargamer and Sinizi don't meet the required 50 posts and 10 rep to request their own map (yes, I'm enforcing the rule now)... If someone else wants the map reviewed, I'll add it to the queue.

This time this review was for a special request. I'm not sure if it was truly wise to request this, but here goes...

 

Attachments

  • Sx'Summoning Arena.w3g
    254.4 KB · Views: 77
Level 15
Joined
Dec 18, 2007
Messages
1,098
Would be nice if you would look at my map (link in sign). It does not contain AI yet, so it's mostly enjoyable online/LAN. If you got any tips after trying I would like to hear them aswell :)

Thanks
-Sinizi
His map has some potential. Worth reviewing. Its an arena map where you choose heroes and fight creeps and other heroes. Never tried it in Multiplayer though, but worth testing out.
If you're free, review this too XD

gamestargamer, I haven't tried your maps. I would check it out and recommend it for reviewing if I find it worth Dark.Revenant's reviews (his reviews are awesome!)
 
Level 6
Joined
Dec 9, 2007
Messages
208
Im glad that you tried it Zack1996, very, but I would have loved if you wrote it in my post so I knew that it wasn't totally out in the cold :p no offense at all ;)
 
Level 13
Joined
Feb 28, 2007
Messages
477
Greed and Glory has been postponed until monday since I had quite a deal of things to do today.

However, Septimus' cinematic was still fair game so here's the review:

(oh, keep in mind that maps that score A- or higher get special map name coloring just as a cosmetic feature. A- gets one color, A gets up to two, A+ gets up to three, and R would get four)

 
Level 13
Joined
Feb 28, 2007
Messages
477
Level 27
Joined
Jun 23, 2009
Messages
4,787
Do you only test completed maps? cause if not itd be awesome if you would review my Battle Depths beta when i release it =) (you seem to be good at reviewing, and it would be awesome to get pro feedback =D)

And eh... why doesent Dark Ranger meet the rep requirements? it says 0 or higher? *confused*
 
Level 31
Joined
May 3, 2008
Messages
3,155
How can battlenet screw up the precise timing when everything execute at the exact timing? Even if it lag, I doubt it could screw it up.

Can you please explain this part, I don't quite get it.

awkward pauses

Nah, not a pause. It was slow motion, I guess I set it freaking slow. :p

boths fighthers seems to have similiar abilities

What can you or me expect. The GUI sucks anyway... :p

Still need to learn JASS to make something far awesome.

WC3 is extremely limited

How truth.

Sound effect add

There is no sound effect of a sword clash that are in rather high speed as far as I search for it. As for footstep, I don't think it make sense since they are walking in grass. As far as I know, we make no sound if we walk in grass. Even if we do, the sound was rather low to be heard. :p

Not bring anything new

Nah, every genre, theme and technique has been used. What can we expect. Getting some fresh meat now a days is nearly impossible.

breaks in the camera

What do you mean?

to see for second time.

Actually, every cinematic replayability values does not exceed more than 2. Of course, it also depends on the user itself how much he likes it.

samurai have 5 katana

/me blames Black_Stan for this errors.

:p

terrain could be improve

I see no more space or anything else need to be add. What makes you say that?

/me is looking at Dark.Revenant with W00t look.

And there is another few question I would like to ask.

1) what is the max score for each criteria.
2) why you use R to represent extremely good, should't it be S?
 
Level 7
Joined
Dec 19, 2008
Messages
276
Which rules i break? WTF

3. Users with 50 or more posts AND 10 or more reputation can request that their own map be reviewed; otherwise you may only request a map someone else made.

I HAVE 100 POSTS

WTF?

Or you does'nt review BETA maps?
 
Level 6
Joined
Dec 9, 2007
Messages
208
Which rules i break? WTF

3. Users with 50 or more posts AND 10 or more reputation can request that their own map be reviewed; otherwise you may only request a map someone else made.

I HAVE 100 POSTS

WTF?

Or you does'nt review BETA maps?

"... And 10 or more reputaion" which you don't have.
 
Level 13
Joined
Feb 28, 2007
Messages
477
@Septimus, the R can change to whatever letter looks best to me, if a map ever acquires it. Since no review calls for it yet, I could change it at any time. Also, the pauses and breaks in the camera are exactly as I say; the camera flow will be continuous most of the time, then suddenly while one of the characters is on the screen the camera will stop and absolutely nothing will happen for about a second, and then it will continue on. The 3/3 on replayability would go to a cinematic that you could go back to in a few months and still love it. Something like Creatures of the Night, you know. Also, the max values can be seen in the original post - I feel that including them in the review would be very difficult to format while still making it look good. Green = full, not green = you're missing something, in general.
 
Level 31
Joined
May 3, 2008
Messages
3,155
the pauses and breaks in the camera are exactly as I say; the camera flow will be continuous most of the time, then suddenly while one of the characters is on the screen the camera will stop and absolutely nothing will happen for about a second,

If you refer to the sequence where the ninja done mirror image and stop. That was because the ninja was doing a talk. You can check out the dialog at bottom center.
 

EHH

EHH

Level 3
Joined
Jun 20, 2009
Messages
35
Try out my map. I'm still making a final product of it, but queue it.

Call it: Tropic Thunder
 

EHH

EHH

Level 3
Joined
Jun 20, 2009
Messages
35
btw, that map took 500,000 k of memory.

You should add the unnecessary usage of memory.
 
Level 13
Joined
Feb 28, 2007
Messages
477
Pardon the double-post but...

Edit: Changed review template a little; added max scores for the sub-categories.

The review has been finished. May the Lord have mercy upon your soul.


And a video review of Digimon ORPG:
And an accompanying review page:

Digimon ORPG.png



Notice to admins: The maps that get a C- to A+ and S deserve an approval in the database; D- to D+ deserve a "Reviewed/Pending", and F- to F+ should be unapproved. Alternatively, I could be given temporary map mod privileges to do it myself.
 
Last edited:
Level 13
Joined
Feb 28, 2007
Messages
477
The odd thing is I looked at Digimon ORPG's triggering. The triggering sucks, but the stuff you saw in the review shouldn't even be happening. The map is so bad that it is transcendant of the limits of WarCraft III, achieving a level of shit that was previously thought impossible.
 
Level 13
Joined
Feb 28, 2007
Messages
477
Sure, I changed the wording a bit. Didn't intend to insult women, only the map.

Also I am reluctant to do multiple reviews for the same person until a suitable amount of time has passed. zach_kirov's last review was about a year ago, so his next map is still fair game.
 

EHH

EHH

Level 3
Joined
Jun 20, 2009
Messages
35
Diaster? He's the one who made Fantasy Life, right?

When are you reviewing Symbiote.
 

EHH

EHH

Level 3
Joined
Jun 20, 2009
Messages
35
I can also make my game look like it's been downloaded 10k times too, zach.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top