Septimus, your ego just got over the roof,
I am telling him a qft especially when he is accusing the spells is bugged based on 1 person opinion rather than the public itself or his own opinion.
If he post a review that are valid, accurate and precise just like Rui, bounty hunter2, approject, kingz, dark-dragon and etc etc does. I would accept it; which he fail to do so.
There is something called as constructive comment, but also there is something called as destructive and invalid.
Do you still remember you have ask the staff to remove rating 1 from your model that are given without valid reason? The same applies here, but more to explain to him why his review are invalid.
If you still insists you are right, tell me which part of his review is valid.
if you really think your coding is great, submit the spell to wc3c.
I am saying my coding is fine, I never said it was great. There is a difference between great and fine, learn to distinguish the difference of it.
Look at my post again, is there any word claim that my coding is great?
Also wc3c doesn't accept GUI coded spells or spells with ordinary concept. Even if I code it in jass with clean coding, it would not be accepted due to the concept.
I have seen countless of resources rejected at wc3c not because of the code, but rather the concept itself.
And it's almost impossible to make a spell without a single bug, it's just the matter of time when you'll see it.
If there is a discovery of it, yes. If there is not, then it was consider clean at this moment.
Approved
