- Joined
- May 10, 2009
- Messages
- 542
Ok, I'll start a debate when some people come to post.
Dreadnought[dA];1163710 said:1) It's made by Blizzard (now Activision Blizzard but w/e)
2) It's a sequel to Starcraft
3) They have been making some awesome graphical updates recently
Result = WTFBBQTECTONICCHUCKNORRISPAWNAGEINCARNATEYEAH?
1) Blizzard have a bad habit of ruining history and wanting a monthly fee :/
Yea, something like that I have heard too...But isn't B.Net going to need monthly fee? That's what I heard
Reasons for not being the best game ever:
1. Definately not enough new things. It's just Starcraft 1 with new graphics, new units and LOL XEL'NAGATOWERZZZZ DESTRUCTAIBLE RAWKS, YALLOW MINREALS ADN LONGASSGRASS! Otherwise it's identical to Starcraft 1. Of course you people are going to argue with "If it's not broken don't fix it."
2. The Starcraft style gameplay is starting to get old and dated. Sure it may not be broken but that doesn't mean that I won't get tired of it.
3. The greatest game of all time has already been made. It's Tetris.
Reasons why Starcraft 2 will still be good.
1. Map Editor: lots of good user made maps.
Now don't get me wrong. I believe that Starcraft 2 is going to be a good game and fun to play. However I don't see it as such an extraordinary game as some of the fans make it out to be. It won't reallly revolutionize the RTS genre either, but it's still going to be fun to play.
Boring to watch, indeed. StarCraft has superior skirmish, and skirmish-match length time, but Warcraft crafts the best campaigns seen in an RTS. RPG campaign [what?! An RTS with an excellent RPG campaign?!!!], stealth-sections [omg, you must be kidding, even Halo Wars minorly ripped them off with their Scarab level, you don't use stealth, but the Scarab beam, well, you'll have to see for yourself], A TD LEVEL?! Heroes that carry over with their xp, abilities and ITEMS [no seriously, items in an rts]?!
Well, anyway, StarCraft has a pretty good campaign too.
More like Half, even 0%-Clarity Level Design 2.
3) is flawed! Starcraft 2 does NOT have medics! It has dropships with magical healing rays. Medics only for custom maps.Dreadnought[dA];1169098 said:2) It has Drugs
3) It has Medics
3) is flawed! Starcraft 2 does NOT have medics! It has dropships with magical healing rays. Medics only for custom maps.
Yeah, I know, physic puzzles and great sequences made in the game engine.. We see those in every game.
I know you're a fanboi of SC, I am aswell, but you don't have to flame all other games for that ^^
And I like HL2 the most because of the mods, there are a lot more to HL2 than to SC and WC3 (EXCEPT for campaigns and maps, but those aint real mods + that melee what was it called?)
pha0001 said:I'll get it for Christmas once they release it.
Its going to be the best game of the year.
Starcraft I gameplay is good, its a 90s game that ppl still play nowadays and make competitions out of it. Surely the II version will be better.
The only bad thing about it is...
You pay the damn campaigns separately!! Its EXPENSIVE
[no seriously, items in an rts]?
It worked fine for DoW.
Dreadnought[dA];1175014 said:People pay for WoW, the most boring game on earth, and you're complaining about paying for Starcraft 2 campaigns!
It all depends on how good it is. If it's the best game ever then it's worth MINIMUM $150.
You have a big point there. Not everyone lives in a First World country.
I am not in the will of what one says; its not recommended to force one into submissive orders into yours. Just don't do it again; I hope me and the moderator will let you go this time, and it will.
Just don't do it again; it is in the behalf of continued slavery and the condemned around the world.