deepstrasz
Map Reviewer
- Joined
- Jun 4, 2009
- Messages
- 20,177
How/where?Check the bottom of the site once you've selected a post.
How/where?Check the bottom of the site once you've selected a post.
As mentioned before, there isn't one anymoreYou should be able to see a check box next to Report.
Works. Thanks. However, I cannot moderate without writing something in the moderation box anymore. Before, the system automatically chose the latest review.Try now.
There is so much new stuff..
I hope I get used to more things but the nav bothers me for now. I prefer text over icons.
edit:
some small edits I would request:
The contest icons look blurry thanks to downscaling, should be bumped up.
There seems to be a double-border around said icons.
It counts deleted resources in my dropdown. I do not have 22 public spells.
Not a fan of the online icon either.
some small edits I would request:
The contest icons look blurry thanks to downscaling, should be bumped up.
There seems to be a double-border around said icons.
It counts deleted resources in my dropdown. I do not have 22 public spells.
Not a fan of the online icon either.
?The advanced search doesn't provide an option for searching user names.
We are working on a solutionI also hope more than four contest icons can be displayed at once
I mean in the main page search.
Yeah, I remember Maps (Approved) had around 200-300.After updating the site in the section with Models, only 100 pages became available, but before there were 400+...
Is that how it should be?
Actually this is something I end up actually afraid here. Consider the reaction can be abused hard. In Hive 2, you can have option for 0 rep and nothing harm you much.Is there any difference between the experience points a reaction icon gives? I see all of the positives give +5 while the two negative ones give -2 or something.
I guess, some users will like you, some won't.Actually this is something I end up actually afraid here. Consider the reaction can be abused hard. In Hive 2, you can have option for 0 rep and nothing harm you much.
For me it looks good on my profile and when clicking my avatar. Ultimately, I think it's on the user to choose a fitting banner.Some profile banners makes it hard to read my profile name when clicking my name from the "online" list. Especially if I use a completely white profile banner or similar.
Seconded, it feels like I'm penalized for a bigger monitor.I'm not a huge fan of the header buttons. I feel they could be more "square" and right next to each other with no margin
We are working on a new header menuSeconded, it feels like I'm penalized for a bigger monitor.
Well, speaking of things we're not fans of... Could we replace this type of avatars:
Do we have enough Warcraft III characters for all the lettersWith something better, preferrably Warcraft related?
Yeah, we will probably have our old default Warcraft avatars for folks not using avatars.With something better, preferrably Warcraft related?
As the author, you can now re-order resources.Just out of curiosity, was setting the order of multiple resources in a single resource to alphabetical from the original order of date added intentional?
So, for resources like Spoon's Coop campaign, the maps now appear based on the name of the maps.
(All Blood elf maps at the top because of B, and all undead maps at the bottom because of U, instead of the date they were added).
Not really an issue, just wanted to check.
You don't lose experience from a negative reaction, you just don't gain any either.Is there any difference between the experience points a reaction icon gives? I see all of the positives give +5 while the two negative ones give -2 or something.
Are they in fact missing though? You're talking about the number of pages, right?Any official comments on the missing resources yet?
They seem to be inaccessible so probably not missing as seeing hive's been really competent with backups however kind of still missing too since they are inaccessible to a normal user.As the author, you can now re-order resources.
You don't lose experience from a negative reaction, you just don't gain any either.
Are they in fact missing though? You're talking about the number of pages, right?
May 24 2014 a bleed effect model is the last resource in models at page 100, what about (6) TehLul_Target.mdx | HIVE (hiveworkshop.com) and any before 2014?What exact resources are we talking about? Do you have a link handy?
Are you saying that you cannot see that one?May 24 2014 a bleed effect model is the last resource in models at page 100, what about (6) TehLul_Target.mdx | HIVE (hiveworkshop.com) and any before 2014?
Fixed. Thanks for reporting. Apparently I had a hard limit of 2000 resultsView attachment 375401Not without a link I had favorited long ago.
Try sorting them by date or something. The system wasn't perfect on Hive 2.0 either.Then I think there might be a problem if that is fixed...
Some of the materials are still unavailable.Fixed. Thanks for reporting. Apparently I had a hard limit of 2000 results![]()
Some of the materials are still unavailable.
With filters, I was able to find more models than are available in the catalog without them.
Found 163 pages of filtered Units, while without filters the site displays only 160 pages. (Units and decor together.)
View attachment 375414
Are you sorting by "last edit date" or by "post date"?The system was at least still working on 2.0View attachment 375415View attachment 375417There are a lot of missing resources even when min-maxing the filters. I know 3.0 is new, that's why we have to report this asap.
I am not writing about the search engine, but about its results. By adding filters, I can see more resources than can be seen in the model catalog without them.
I am not sure what you mean.How can I use listing with numbers or dots for posts?
I am not sure what you mean.
Ah.I am not writing about the search engine, but about its results. By adding filters, I can see more resources than can be seen in the model catalog without them.
The catalog of models includes more than 400 pages, 240 of which are now impossible to see without using filters.