You do not understand my msg.
What I mean here is, majority of the user give 3/5 at TC map state various of reason and opinion of why it deserve 3/5 that are helpful and contributive to the development. While those who give below 3 does not even state 1 reason or neither flaw of the work.
Even bounty give 3/5, he state various flaw at TC map which are helpful. At here, reality or not; we do not need user who just come in and said "omg, is bad. 1/5" without reason just like you did.
You want to give review, give it with indepth information of what you found out to be wrong. Not take somebody else review and said "omg, his review is negative. The map must be bad".
View approject, zelda.alex, me, hfr, amegurumi, bounty, rui and others on how we evaluate a work.
At reality as well, the only way to improve yourself are to get precise opinion.