• 🏆 Texturing Contest #33 is OPEN! Contestants must re-texture a SD unit model found in-game (Warcraft 3 Classic), recreating the unit into a peaceful NPC version. 🔗Click here to enter!
  • 🏆 Hive's 6th HD Modeling Contest: Mechanical is now open! Design and model a mechanical creature, mechanized animal, a futuristic robotic being, or anything else your imagination can tinker with! 📅 Submissions close on June 30, 2024. Don't miss this opportunity to let your creativity shine! Enter now and show us your mechanical masterpiece! 🔗 Click here to enter!

Which map optimizer to use?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Vex's is likely the most stable optimizer. There is a Chinese one here:
http://www.wc3c.net/showthread.php?t=101586

But there have been more issues with that one afaik. Usually, the standard process is to widgetize + optimize the map. As for protection, the optimizer provides "soft protection" (although, it is all for the sake of optimization, not really for protection). Look into something like Spazzler if you need additional protection.
 
http://www.hiveworkshop.com/forums/tools-560/widgetizer-1-3-0-9-a-62920/

It converts the object files in the map into slk/txt, which is loaded a lot faster (albeit, can sometimes increase the file size). While it can sometimes add to the file size, it is a good thing to do if (1) your map has a lot of objects (2) you have file size to spare without hitting the 8 MB limit. Even so, you should always try it out on your map and weight the results (results may vary).
 
So I run Widgetizer on the map, then the Map Optimizer?

Yes. I haven't tried the other way around, but the map optimizer will likely delete the listfile, so the widgetizer might fail (technically, you can work around it by adding your own listfile when searching for the file, but idk whether mike implemented that. it is better to be on the safe side by widgetizing then optimizing). Make a back up, and fiddle with the options if anything fails. Make sure you read through the widgetizer manual/readme, and perhaps this.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top