Warhammer Club

[Pyramidhe@d]

quality. not quantity.
here
check the strength and the casualties.
30 tank vs 6541 tanks.
looks like finland won.

 

[HailFireer]

Listen. I am a big fan of WWII tanks and so si Velm. If you dont belive me ask him. Germans had very good tanks. Russians folowed with theyr T-34 and IS-1, IS-2 and the moster IS-3. America and Britain had nothing like that. They sucked at tanks. Britain had a good fighter the fameous "Spitfire". American well, they had nothing. Well exept the nuclear bomb. but only at the wery end of war. And only thx to germans, cuz if they didnt started making 1, americans wouldent either.
As for massive casualties of rushians, well thats a slavic thing, mostly.

 

[Velmarshal]

Russians are just like the orks from the dawn of war they just pile up guns and people and flood the enemy.

 

[HailFireer]

But they are much more intelegent, and have beater tanks.

 

[Velmarshal]

Woot?! Russians have better tanks?
If a good tank to you is a brick of steel on tracks then, yes.

 

[HailFireer]

Well Orks only good tank is Looted tank, and thats Leemon Rus they stole...

 

[Velmarshal]

Looted leman is an artiliery unit.

 

[Pyramidhe@d]

i find wartrakk really good once you have 4 or more. mostly guerilla and infantry distruption.

 

[HailFireer]

Wel lthen orcs have no tanks only artilery...

 

[Pyramidhe@d]

they probably dont make tank specifically. just metal box with lots 'a gunz crammed with lots 'a boyz

'a= "of" in ork speek

 

[HailFireer]

Rofl

 

[Warhunter]

hm..
@ Pyramidhe@d
Didn't tought about that. :S

 

[HailFireer]

Thought about what?

 

[Crusad3r91]

This should be the Ork's "tank":

 

[Warhunter]

About the orc tank: LOLZ.
HailFireer, it's about Fallout, It looks like the 50'th or something. And pyramidhe@d said why it was. Because it was a bit wierd whit that things in the future. But as pyramidhe@d said, It is an alternative future.

 

[HailFireer]

Omg http://www.shacknews.com/onearticle.x/54596 Wargammer 40k TPS. Looks cool for an early development. Still has to be aproved for mass production. Look at the video. More then 9 minutes.

 

[Mechanical Man]

That game looks pretty lame. Is like omg i r badass, walking among the enemies firing, showering with their bullets, some spectacular scenes which actually don't contribute much to gameplay tbh. Even being a space marine, you shouldn't be in the middle, at the center of arena, but be more careful. Still Firewarrior looks better game. I'd prefer some shooter where being an eldar. That would be fun.

 

[Warhunter]

It's quite awsome game. But the bolter doesn't do almost any damage. It shud take moore.

 

[HailFireer]

Well like I sed, and you hurd in the cideo, game is still early development. And thing that hes hard to kill maybe is because its the begining of the forst level. Or maybe they setted it up that marine is invincible so they could show all things thay have to show.
I agree about the bolter. Maybe it will be changed later.

 

[Mun'ki]

Yea.. It's not like SM aren't over-powererd in everyting else [/sarcasm]

 

[Crusad3r91]

Erm, not to sound picky, but if you go back about by 30 pages you'll see that we've already discussed about that game... xD
Just for pointing that out =)

 

[HailFireer]

Oh I see. Well I wasent member at the time, and I realy couldent read all 25 pages that werealready there....

 

[Warhunter]

I think this is one of the most active groups here on Hive.

 

[Pyramidhe@d]

yay they has chainsword!!! thank god they are making a space marine shooter game.
Warhammer: Firewarrior was a piece of shit. i hope they do a better job.
it looks like it has special sync kill moves and stuff. what is it killing at the start anyway. renegade imperial guard?

 

[Warhunter]

Nope, It's chaos that goes owned.

Herrecy grows from idleness.

 

[Pyramidhe@d]

renegade imperial guard IS part of chaos.
Herrecy grows from idleness? heck, then i am chaos for sure!

 

[Velmarshal]

I told you that DoW would rock in Gears of War style.

 

[Warhunter]

lolz... ^^

 

[Tyranid]

IMO the Warhammer 40,000: Space Marine game looks baaaaaaaaaaaaaaad at the moment. The battles seems abit repetetive and boring, the blocking looks dumb and the sync kills most likely get old pretty fast. Then again it's an early stage so there is still time for change.

However I absolutely HATE the Bolter! Why is a weapon shooting mini rockets suddenly a useless sub machine gun? The Bolter does not shoot that fast and it shoots explosive rounds. It should tear the traitor guards into pieces in a matter of seconds. Also the way he just beat up a bunch of Chaos Space Marines at the same time doesn't make sense. They're supposed to be equal and this SM looks like a normal SM, yet he is tearing his way through them like a knife through butter.

 

[HailFireer]

Well, its probably easy dificulty. If thay were same strength, it would make game smash your kayboard hard.

 

[Crusad3r91]

Easy or not, it's quite disappointing (from my point of view, of course) to see such things: Warhammer 40k has its own lore with its specifications, as well as a very good built-in balance, so I don't see why games should re-balance, re-invent it. Of course, the TT game is turn based so there's still some ironing to do for the sake of balance but it's quite disappointing to see a Baneblade getting owned by a Land Raider, Space Marines outshooted by Orks (DOW), one single SM owning more CSMs or a such BAD bolter (SM).
That said, I would like to see some shooter about WH40k where you act as IG, maybe as a commando squad like Kasrkins or Stormtroopers. IMHO it would give the best atmosphere since:
- You are not a killing machine, you are a simple human: think more before doing any action.
- You don't have super-technological weapons (such as Tau - BTW, in Firewarrior one Tau owns lots of IGs, SMs and CSMs... same as written some lines above :S).
- The gothic-warlike feeling that characterise WH40k is still there. =)

Of course, being a SM is just another "feeling", but I'd prefer the IG's one. =)
Just my preference. =)

 

[HailFireer]

But in strategy there are squads vs squads. Here there is only you vs squads. If it stayed same as in strategy, players would get ownd easy. Well exept when theyr fighting eldar guardians orchaos cultists.

 

[Crusad3r91]

Then make it so that you won't be alone facing entire squads. That's the point: if you really want to be alone facing an entire squad, then make a Dreadnought game. =)

 

[HailFireer]

Tellthat to them. Aldo drednaught is cool, I wouldent like to be piloting 1. You cant get out of him, nor do anything fun and pleaserfull during your free time.

 

[Warhunter]

hehe, That's one problems whit being a Dreadnought.

 

[HailFireer]

Oh, and most of your body parts are gone.

 

[Warhunter]

I think that you only have your brain left

 

[HailFireer]

And vital organs.

 

[Warhunter]

hm.. Well it can be good to have something that can keep your brain working.

 

[Pyramidhe@d]

vital organs. like heart, lungs and your "bits".

 

[Warhunter]

mm..

 

[Velmarshal]

Brm, brm, chainsword!

 

[Warhunter]

Any one who knows when DoW2 is being released?

 

[HailFireer]

Its a secret XD

 

[Pyramidhe@d]

anyone know if they are doing chaos as a race?

 

[Warhunter]

Why would they not do it? It's a race in DoW. So why not in DoW2?
But i don't care so much about that, I don't play whit chaos.

 

[Crusad3r91]

I heard Chaos will be included in an expansion. DOW2 races are the 4 announced ones, as far as I know. =)

 

[Tyranid]

DoW 2 release date right not is late february. However some say it's Q2 2009. We'll soon see. Also Chaos will NOT be in DoW 2 at start but they and imperial guard will most likely be in the first expansion.

 

[Warhunter]

ok...

 

[Warhunter]

Any one who knows if a demo from SC2, W40K SM and W40K DoW2 have been realesed yet?