Moderator
M
Moderator
00:59, 31st Jul 2010
ap0calypse: Rejected
ap0calypse: Rejected
(4 ratings)
I realize it may seem harsh to give it a 1/5 due to that factor. However, I played the map and it made me feel ill. So factors in the map, even though you may not have been able to forsee them, made me unable to play it further. So for me, this map is unplayable, hence I have to rate it based on that.There's more than enough maps with a third person cam. Maybe i will add an option to remove it later.
Also, I dont think I deserved that grade because your post makes it seem as if you hardly even played it.
I realize it may seem harsh to give it a 1/5 due to that factor. However, I played the map and it made me feel ill. So factors in the map, even though you may not have been able to forsee them, made me unable to play it further. So for me, this map is unplayable, hence I have to rate it based on that.
For others, it likely won't be and they will rate it based on their experience.
I understand your point. However, why not let your current cam be the default mode but leave an option to switch to the more standard top/down view?Acceptable. Sorry the cam feature left you to being unable to play it.
The beta testers were also complaining about the camera when i first introduced it but they quikly got used to it after I smoothed the cam's turning speed.
I can either choose to completely take it out of keep it in. In default view you can view a large area around your character, even to its back. Its basicly the back view that i wanted to take from the player to keep the game more edgy.
Also you could reduce sight range for those that prefer the Top down view to keep the edge up.
Great! I can now give this a fair rating of 4/5.Thanks for the feedback so far. Due to popular demand so far, i'm going to work on the new camera system as soon as I possibly can.
EDIT: Updated.