- Joined
- Dec 21, 2008
- Messages
- 766
Ive seen the new monk class on the Diablo 3 page http://www.blizzard.com/diablo3/characters/monk.xml Not mutch more to say.
Monk model will be Peasant, obiviously!
Taylor is making a monk model go look at it!
http://www.hiveworkshop.com/forums/modeling-and-animation-276/diablo-3-monk-for-wc3-wip-141381/#post1278440
Diablo is not street fighter
Anyway, I really do hope Blizzard will get so many complaints that they actually consider withdrawing this outrage!
I support "thinking outside the box" and all. But this?! My god, Blizzard just raped Diablo. How can we just stand by and do nothing?!
Jesus christ, even the movie trailer had major flaws.. They just butchered the concept of the dark cultists for instance. Now they're suddenly a part of some mighty armyinstead of a secret dark, diabolic, demon-worshipping cult..
I'm disappointedI will not even recreate the Monk for D3:TFA...
My god![]()
I wish I could reach through my monitor, and slap you in the face for being so ridiculously arrogant.
Diablo is not street fighter, granted. However, it's one class that's going to be played like this, and what better class than a monk who fist fights... I mean, 2d fighter games really have it down when it comes to physical brawls (Street Figher, Mortal Kombat, Super Smash Bros.), that emulating it into an rpg game will be perfect.
Or maybe you have a better idea on how this should work, neh?
It doesn't surprise me that you feel like this though. People are bound to be skeptical. I didn't mean to be such a bastard to you in this post... but it's just freakin ridiculous how stupid people can be about this kind of thing.
"OMG GUYS! BLIZZARD IS CHANGING DIABLO 3, AND IT'S NOT GOING TO BE LIKE DIABLO 2, AND OMG! ALL THE THINGS I LEARNED IN DIABLO 2 WON'T COPY OVER IT! THEY'RE RUINING MY GAME!"
It's amazing how people will freak out over an artist's decision to try something different.
So much for the Assassin I fapped on. ~_~
Female version anyone?
Diablo is not street fighter
Anyway, I really do hope Blizzard will get so many complaints that they actually consider withdrawing this outrage!
I support "thinking outside the box" and all. But this?! My god, Blizzard just raped Diablo. How can we just stand by and do nothing?!
Jesus christ, even the movie trailer had major flaws.. They just butchered the concept of the dark cultists for instance. Now they're suddenly a part of some mighty armyinstead of a secret dark, diabolic, demon-worshipping cult..
I'm disappointedI will not even recreate the Monk for D3:TFA...
My god![]()
I support you man who cares diablo 3 looks like WoW or other games...
diablo 3 is not WoW, sure it may open up to an open environment, but that does not mean it is wow... there wont be guilds, there wont be 2 factions, there are no mounts, outlands, or lich king... it is an upgrade to the diablo universe, one that players have been looking forward to since diablo 1... you cant tell me that you really like the whole "closed in repetitiveness that is diablo 1 and 2" ... i mean, its the same thing ... over and over and over again. everyone needs to keep there mind open, diablo 3 is not turning into wow ... it is simply improving the game play so you dont do the same shit over and over and over again...
ok, first off, what character would you like them to create? the sorc? or necro? or even paladin? im sorry but they have created everything before... what else will they create? blizzard wont get complaintes because the monk is a great idea. people will love playing as him i think you are they only person that thinks they ruined it.... so lighten up and relax, its not like you are being forced to play that character.
diablo 3 is not WoW, sure it may open up to an open environment, but that does not mean it is wow... there wont be guilds, there wont be 2 factions, there are no mounts, outlands, or lich king... it is an upgrade to the diablo universe, one that players have been looking forward to since diablo 1... you cant tell me that you really like the whole "closed in repetitiveness that is diablo 1 and 2" ... i mean, its the same thing ... over and over and over again. everyone needs to keep there mind open, diablo 3 is not turning into wow ... it is simply improving the game play so you dont do the same shit over and over and over again...
Ask them if they have some kind of issues with their eyes then.On the official diablo 3 forum alot of people complaint and think it looks like wow and they are not gonna buy it etc...
Ask them if they have some kind of issues with their eyes then.
Everything is still PURE diablo. if you dont agree, i dont know what...
I think that the games is totally different, the only things alike is that you level up a character. And ofc it will be a little similar becouse blizzard is making both of the games, but i would not complain, diablo 3 is pure epicness.
ok, first off, what character would you like them to create? the sorc? or necro? or even paladin? im sorry but they have created everything before... what else will they create? blizzard wont get complaintes because the monk is a great idea. people will love playing as him i think you are they only person that thinks they ruined it.... so lighten up and relax, its not like you are being forced to play that character.
diablo 3 is not WoW, sure it may open up to an open environment, but that does not mean it is wow... there wont be guilds, there wont be 2 factions, there are no mounts, outlands, or lich king... it is an upgrade to the diablo universe, one that players have been looking forward to since diablo 1... you cant tell me that you really like the whole "closed in repetitiveness that is diablo 1 and 2" ... i mean, its the same thing ... over and over and over again. everyone needs to keep there mind open, diablo 3 is not turning into wow ... it is simply improving the game play so you dont do the same shit over and over and over again...
No they havn't. And actually they have already gotten lots of complaints.ok, first off, what character would you like them to create? the sorc? or necro? or even paladin? im sorry but they have created everything before... what else will they create? blizzard wont get complaintes because the monk is a great idea. people will love playing as him i think you are they only person that thinks they ruined it.... so lighten up and relax, its not like you are being forced to play that character.
Who said i dont agree? i just said some ppl complaint that monk is not good but i simply love it its my personal favorite and its the first class ill play...
No they havn't. And actually they have already gotten lots of complaints.
And yes the idea of a monk is great, but the way they executed this was horrible. Most dissapointly it doesn't match the dark gothic fantasy theme which most Diablo fans have loved since the first Diablo game and lore-books.
If you care about the gothic concept of the Diablo history and lore, you will find this new addition most unsuitable. This new Monk class, could easily have been a street fighter character. It could have been done so much more dark & gothic in my oppinion. And I will create a concept drawing of how I think the Monk should have been like, to make an example.
I mean listen to this "Way of the Hundred Fists"and just take a look at "Seven-Sided Strike". Even though it looks cool (again manga was the first to come up with the sudden-teleportish strike effect). It just ain't fitting for the Diablo universe...
I'm not saying that the Monk isn't awesome. I think the artists did a great job. But it doesn't fit the Diablo universe!
Go whine somewhere else, this is suggestion forum, not "i dont agree with you" forum![]()
.... This whole thread doesn't belong in suggestions. It's ironic that you're posting this only because you don't agree with me. Especially irnoic because you're whining because you don't agree.
No they havn't. And actually they have already gotten lots of complaints.
And yes the idea of a monk is great, but the way they executed this was horrible. Most dissapointly it doesn't match the dark gothic fantasy theme which most Diablo fans have loved since the first Diablo game and lore-books.
If you care about the gothic concept of the Diablo history and lore, you will find this new addition most unsuitable. This new Monk class, could easily have been a street fighter character. It could have been done so much more dark & gothic in my oppinion. And I will create a concept drawing of how I think the Monk should have been like, to make an example.
I mean listen to this "Way of the Hundred Fists"and just take a look at "Seven-Sided Strike". Even though it looks cool (again manga was the first to come up with the sudden-teleportish strike effect). It just ain't fitting for the Diablo universe...
I'm not saying that the Monk isn't awesome. I think the artists did a great job. But it doesn't fit the Diablo universe!
Dude, you're talkin' way over your head. Read my post again..Seriously. Shut up.
This isn't your game, so let it go. Complaining is one thing, but to say that what they're doing is "ruining the Diablo universe" is really stupid. You're not the creator of Diablo, nor are you a historian of said universe.
And from your posistion, didn't Diablo 2 ruin Diablo? Multiple towns, new characters, the hero becomes Diablo. How dare they! The hero was suppsoe to be able to sustain Diablo!
And why aren't you complaining about the possibility of Diablo being resurrected? Didn't we kill him not ONCE, but TWICE?! But no, you insist on complaining on a character choice THAT WAS IN the original Diablo.
Seriously man. Back off. Diablo is not your game, it's Blizzards. If you don't like the idea, then don't play the game.
EDIT: This just occured to me. Aren't the monk and assassin similiar? Infact... The assassin did more damage (and different) with more combo points. The Monk and the Assassin have the same skill sets (so it seems at the moment), but yet... you're complaining?
Oh, please. Grow up -_-Seriously man. Back off. Diablo is not your game, it's Blizzards.
I said that before aswell.Just wanting to point one thing out... Monk was already in Diablo1: Hellfire (Expansion that wasn't made by Blizzard but they still approved it), so stop saying it doesn't fit Diablo universe.
Dude, you're talkin' way over your head. Read my post again..
Of course I'm not the creator of the Diablo saga nor am I a writer of the story or lore for that matter. That has nothing to do with anything?
Niether did I ever say that the new class is "ruining the Diablo universe".
And all your talk about not complaining about Diablo being brought back in in this third installment of Blizzard's Diablo franchise. Is unrelevant..
You're talkin' out of your ass. Pardon my language.
Oh, please. Grow up -_-
WARNING - This is getting sligtly off-topic.
\And yes the idea of a monk is great, but the way they executed this was horrible. Most dissapointly it doesn't match the dark gothic fantasy theme which most Diablo fans have loved since the first Diablo game and lore-books.
If you care about the gothic concept of the Diablo history and lore, you will find this new addition most unsuitable. This new Monk class, could easily have been a street fighter character. It could have been done so much more dark & gothic in my oppinion.
I mean listen to this "Way of the Hundred Fists" and just take a look at "Seven-Sided Strike". Even though it looks cool (again manga was the first to come up with the sudden-teleportish strike effect). It just ain't fitting for the Diablo universe...
I'm not saying that the Monk isn't awesome. I think the artists did a great job. But it doesn't fit the Diablo universe!
\
Yeah, I don't think I need to say anything else. If you're going to argue, at least take a side first. You say that it doesn't fit with the lore, and not part of the universe, then you deny that. So which is it?
And you're telling me to grow up, for telling you that the game doesn't belong to you, so whether or not you think it does or doesn't fit doesn't really matter. Are you not going to play the game because Blizzard bent their lore (if they did)? Doubtful.
\
Yeah, I don't think I need to say anything else. If you're going to argue, at least take a side first. You say that it doesn't fit with the lore, and not part of the universe, then you deny that. So which is it?
And you're telling me to grow up, for telling you that the game doesn't belong to you, so whether or not you think it does or doesn't fit doesn't really matter. Are you not going to play the game because Blizzard bent their lore (if they did)? Doubtful.
Oh, you would need to say a whole lot more than that. But not in this thread. If you intend to continue this discussion I suggest you send me a private message instead.Yeah, I don't think I need to say anything else. If you're going to argue, at least take a side first. You say that it doesn't fit with the lore, and not part of the universe, then you deny that. So which is it?
And you're telling me to grow up, for telling you that the game doesn't belong to you, so whether or not you think it does or doesn't fit doesn't really matter. Are you not going to play the game because Blizzard bent their lore (if they did)? Doubtful.