- Joined
- Feb 19, 2010
- Messages
- 182
Tell me, who's models are they?
(1 ratings)
Tell me, who's models are they?
Third Party Material
All maps must give credit to the authors of material included in the map that is not made by the maker. Pirated or stolen content is not permitted.
For your information, it really wouldn't matter to me but I added the credits anyways.
I can't see why, that doesn't really improve anything according to me.Good thing that was only my first version eh?
- One: Still haven't fixed leaks
That link doesn't help since I know what I am doing and have been doing what that said before even reading it.
Well ask Septimus if you don't trust me! I am creating terrain and loading Screens for his campaign and he is so lazy that he don't even put me in credits (so far ^^)
CWeener's Review V2.09 Review # 11
Reviewing the map "RageFul Frenzies"
Rating System (in weener points:)
1-10 Originality
1-10 Replayability (discounted for cinematics*)
1-10 Triggering (discounted for protected maps*)
1-10 Terraining
1-10 Object Managing (custom items and destructibles etc...)
1-10 Spells (if applies**)
1-10 Description
1-15 Engaging a.k.a. fun to play
1-15 Misc (size, system implementation, laginess etc...)
-100 or +100 for abiding by THW rules.
* = when one is discounted then other sections maximums are raised, and those sections are judged harder (if your map applies then it will show you what i raised later)
** = some maps dont really need spells so this section is discounted and given an automatic 10.Rating System Scores
Less than 100 = FF- (Reported, You clearly didnt abide by all of the posting rules, and i have reported you for (not) doing so.)
100-150 Points = F- (Rancid and Needs major work. Vote for Rejection and no +rep.)
151-160 Points = F (Bad and Needs work. vote for Rejection and no +rep.)
161-170 Points = D (Below Average and Needs much updating. has potential. vote for rejection and no +rep.)
171-180 Points = C (Okay but Needs updates. has potential. vote for rejection* and no +rep.)
181-190 Points = B (Good but still not reaching full potential vote for approval but no +rep)
191-199 Points = A (Great and probably has reached full potential**. good job. vote for approval and +rep.)
200 Points = A+ (Amazing, you did everything right and went all out, approval and +rep)
* = depending on the map really, and what categories it scored low in
** = not always but most cases.RageFul Frenzies Scores
Triggering score not available, so other maximums were raised(see rating system*)
1-11 Originality *5* while this map has unique aspects, it's main concept is not unique.
1-11 Replayabilit5 *6* Gets boring, waiting on slow units...
1-11 Terraining *6* Flat. bad/no use of tiles. no doodads, few trees.
1-11 Object Managing *8* not much work, but not bad work.
1-11 Spells *5?* I don't even recall there being a spell.
1-11 Description *6* put more thought here. Hidden tags dont make it look much better. Look at this review for example,
try to quote it just to see what&how much coding takes to make somethng look good.
1-17 Engaging *10* It engages you i suppose but as I said before, it gets boring.
1-17 Misc *8* no comment.
-100 or 100 Rules *100*
0-200 All-in-all *156* F (Bad and Needs work. vote for Rejection and no +rep.)
Author's Note,
You could make this much better. I like it but I got bored fast. even with friends. Update.Update.Update.
Bugs:
nothing that I could see.
Recommendations:
my dislikes say it all.
[liked]
the trees moving i guess.
custom models...
[didn't like]
No text boxes? I guess you did that on purpose, but I did not lke that effect.
slowest move speed ever...rediculous.
needs AI
small models, and a small base, and a small map.
gross terrain, you probably didn't even use all of your tiles...
no doodads.
protected.
~~~~~~~~~~~~If any map I've reviewed has been updated, feel free the ask me to re-review it. or if I haven't reviewed YOUR map, feel free to ask me.![]()