- Joined
- Jun 17, 2007
- Messages
- 3,837
40% of the American population are screaming 'its the end of the world' because a black guy got elected.
A line similar to one from "Kill the Bush Man Monthly" Magazine.
40% of the American population are screaming 'its the end of the world' because a black guy got elected.
Your horrible at percentages =)
Same with me. If his/her morals are good, I think they would do a good job running the country. Obviously not just anyone with good morals can be president/prime minister, but if they are even able to be in the running, I think they are qualified enough.For me, (when I can vote) I will vote on morals, I don't want some ignorant fool running the country even though he has the most experience......
Hence why I mentioned that anyone that has a chance of running/winning in the first place, should be good enough to run a country. Of course I agree with you, I meant in an election like last American one where there are basically two choices. Now to me, either would be able to run a country to some extent, and it's down to morals.Based entirely on morals? A completely moral person could be a shitty leader.
Likewise, a completely brilliant leader could be ruthless and arrogant.
Basing a vote entirely on one factor or another doesn't make too much sense to me.
--donut3.5--
You have little faith in humanity. Ouch.There is no such thing as morals. It's just a made up concept on what makes you feel is 'right'. Even if morals were real, it makes no difference. And besides, they are politicians. The only reason either of them are running is because of either 3 things. (Or all of them)
1. Money.
2. Power.
3. Fame.
You have to be realistic. They could care less about this country. The only reason they care is because it affects those 3 things.
Pretty sure you can't run for president if you weren't born in the country. If he wasn't, we'd be hearing all about it in the media. Maybe I'm wrong, but I highly doubt you're right.Frankly, I think Barrack was a very bad choice. He will bring change. But that doesn't mean 'good' change. He has no experience, and he wants to pull our troops back. The media always says, "Oh, have our troops come home." but, when I talk to the troops and they're parents, they see all the good being done over there. The media inflates it so much, by just showing us the worst of the worst. And, he is trying to alter the constitution. Everyone knows, that he was not born in the USA. He went to see his grandma, and she even said herself that he was born elsewhere. When he went to the country (which I believe was Indonesia or something) he had his birth certifacate sealed there. The court in the USA asked for his birth certifacate, but he refused to give it to them. We really know nothing about him except that our enemies all want him for president. I predict this country won't be around for long. Maybe another 70 years. But that's it.
If anyone who replies to this in a hostile, dramatic, or otherwise disrespectful way, (which I know someone will) you will be completely ignored.
My god you are one cynical bastard Mr. Bob. Have you been watching Fox News through the entire election campaign? Christ.
True. The only problem with morals is that they are entirely subjective. My vote might swing if it was something like lying or exposed corruption they've been pulling, but not most of the mudslinging crap the media has pulled off (oh no when John McCain was 4 he stole a beach ball from his friend! when Obama was 12 he cheated on a spelling test!)Hence why I mentioned that anyone that has a chance of running/winning in the first place, should be good enough to run a country. Of course I agree with you, I meant in an election like last American one where there are basically two choices. Now to me, either would be able to run a country to some extent, and it's down to morals.
1.) The war against Iraq wasn't technically a war, so technically they mean the War on Terror.
Alberto Gonzales said:There was not a war declaration, either in connection with Al Qaida or in Iraq. It was an authorization to use military force. I only want to clarify that, because there are implications. Obviously, when you talk about a war declaration, you're possibly talking about affecting treaties, diplomatic relations. And so there is a distinction in law and in practice. And we're not talking about a war declaration. This is an authorization only to use military force.
You have little faith in humanity. Ouch.
I won't even comment on the first part.
Pretty sure you can't run for president if you weren't born in the country. If he wasn't, we'd be hearing all about it in the media. Maybe I'm wrong, but I highly doubt you're right.
I agree that getting out of the war now is a bad idea. It won't help anything if they leave now, and it will show the world that the US can be defeated by far weaker army. Dictators don't seem to give a shit about the UN, and if the US pull out, I doubt they will fear the US anymore. Which can't be good.
Of course this is all speculation by some random 18 year old kid that really doesn't know a whole lot.![]()
lol
You can't even tell me how I am wrong about morals. There is no 'law' about morals. So no.
Second, THE MEDIA DOESN'T CARE! The media WANTS Barrack Obama. They say, "Fair and balanced". That's a lie. THEY ALL KNOW HE WAS NOT BORN HERE.
And lol, your last comment is so odd. How do you know if I know a lot? I find you quite amusing. I frankly, do not think you may know a lot. It makes no difference at all.
How do you know he wasn't born here? because of his last name? because a persons last name really means absolutely nothing.
Also you have to be born in the country to run for president, thats why Arnold can't run for president =P
Dude, take a chill pill-
He has to be born here otherwise the judicial branch would be allllllllllll over him.
We never officially declared War on the Iraqi government. Thus it is not legally a war.
This is the last post I shall reply to. Or even read.
They have no evidence. He had his certifacate sealed in Kenya. He just says, "I was born in Hawaii!"
Why the heck would his entire family state he was born in Kenya? And why would he not come forward with is birth certifacate? Why the heck would he seal it in Kenya till after the election?
We never officially declared War on the Iraqi government. Thus it is not legally a war.
I'm not really talking about that though, I'm talking about Gay marriage, abortion, euthanasia, ect.True. The only problem with morals is that they are entirely subjective. My vote might swing if it was something like lying or exposed corruption they've been pulling, but not most of the mudslinging crap the media has pulled off (oh no when John McCain was 4 he stole a beach ball from his friend! when Obama was 12 he cheated on a spelling test!)
Nothing was ever that extreme, but the media and both parties' campaigns did do an annoyingly nice job of making mountains out of molehills per usual out of minuscule things that shouldn't even be cared about.
--donut3.5--
I figured it would be futile, and I honestly didn't understand you, so I ignored it.You can't even tell me how I am wrong about morals. There is no 'law' about morals. So no.
You still have not given us any proof of this. I'd appreciate it if you'd link us to some information, or just stop getting worked up and drop it.Second, THE MEDIA DOESN'T CARE! The media WANTS Barrack Obama. They say, "Fair and balanced". That's a lie. THEY ALL KNOW HE WAS NOT BORN HERE.
Sorry about that, I was referring to myself. Poor communication on my part.And lol, your last comment is so odd. How do you know if I know a lot? I find you quite amusing. I frankly, do not think you may know a lot. It makes no difference at all.
That's like saying that Nazi Germany killing Jews wasn't a holocaust. Smart up a bit, mate.
PMs are for chumps. I prefer to duke it out in public.Ok guys, you obviously, did not read were I said to PM me.
We should drop it, and gosh darn I wish I had thought of that first.First! The morals issue. What decides "good" and what is "bad"? Unless you are a christian, which I am, it makes no sense. And lastly, this has nothing to do with the original point. So drop it now.
I looked on youtube. It's just a conspiracy, there's no proof at all. They showed videos of Kenyans saying he was originally from Africa, and you consider that proof? I would figure they are talking about the fact that his ancestors are from Africa, and so he is originally from Africa.Second! The proof. Just search google. It's everywhere. There is even a guy making a law suit against him. Type in "Barrack Obama born in Kenya" You can even search Youtube. I am still baffled that you guys don't know about it.
I don't think I'm arrogant, although I'm probably not very objective with myself, so I won't deny it.Now! Just for Gilles. When you post, you tend to be a bit arrogant. I am not trying to look mature. When I said, "you amuse me" I seriously meant, that you amuse me. Please, when you start making comments like that, you stray from the actual point. If you want to question my character, do it somewhere else. And be mature about it. You keep making assumptions. Like, "you are worked up". How do you know I am worked up? I merely used caps. For all you know, I might not even care about this.
PMs are for chumps. I prefer to duke it out in public.
This last paragraph is actually very off topic so we should drop this part as well, just debate the Obama stuff.
------ (Whats the code for a line?) --------
I wonder how many times you'll say that again in near future.CONVERSATION OFFICIALLY DROPPED!
I wonder how many times you'll say that again in near future.![]()
It's a battle of wits. Not a great one, but one nonetheless.A fight, on the internet.
Aren't you two mature.