-
Listen to a special audio message from Bill Roper to the Hive Workshop community (Bill is a former Vice President of Blizzard Entertainment, Producer, Designer, Musician, Voice Actor) 🔗Click here to hear his message!
-
Read Evilhog's interview with Gregory Alper, the original composer of the music for WarCraft: Orcs & Humans 🔗Click here to read the full interview.
-
The Hive's 22nd Icon Contest: Creep Abilities is now concluded, time to vote for your favourite set of icons! Click here to vote!
-
✅ The POLL for Hive's Texturing Contest #34 is OPEN! Vote for the TOP 3 SKINS! 🔗Click here to cast your vote!
-
✅ The POLL for Hive's Techtree Contest #20 is OPEN! Vote for the TOP 3 FACTIONS! 🔗Click here to cast your vote!
Can you do this
- Status
- Joined
- Jan 11, 2009
- Messages
- 3,411
Uhmm... you removed the infernal?
It's just the smoke left, and some untextured toes.
Just think: Is this model going to contribute?
I'd say totally no.
Not even if you changed the materials to additive, so that it would actually look like a ghost, are you allowed to publish models like this.
It's just the smoke left, and some untextured toes.
Just think: Is this model going to contribute?
I'd say totally no.
Not even if you changed the materials to additive, so that it would actually look like a ghost, are you allowed to publish models like this.
- Joined
- Jul 27, 2004
- Messages
- 3,685
I agree with Fingolfin and Mulgrim.
Removing the Infernal geoset mesh would be considered as a simple effortless edit, thus it would get rejected when it gets moderated.
The voidwalker and the shade look more ghostly than this model.
Removing the Infernal geoset mesh would be considered as a simple effortless edit, thus it would get rejected when it gets moderated.
The voidwalker and the shade look more ghostly than this model.
- Status
