Camera System 1.01

[Moderator]

23:30, 18th Dec 2009
TriggerHappy:

Review for Camera System

We have way to many of these. If you feel yours provides something that is unique and the others on this site don't have, feel free to send me a PM/VM,

Status

Rejected

 

[Aspard]

Please, explain me, in which way your system is better than this one: https://www.hiveworkshop.com/forums...pdated-103625/?prev=search=camera&d=list&r=20

 

[eleljrk]

True Aspard, any way its ageinst "Da Mighty Rules".. ^^

Originality
Submissions should be at least somewhat unique, except in cases where they greatly improve on an existing spell in terms of performance, cleanliness (of code), visuals, or otherwise.

And i think its around 10-20 Camera systems now.. soo...

 

[Aspard]

You are too fast, don't you think he really has some statements to protect his system?

 

[eleljrk]

Sure.. +rep you xD

 

[noob134]

i uploaded this resource because i thought it would be useful to people on the hive.
If it is not i will remove it. Also, i never said my resource was better than anyone's. It is up to people's opinion to decide that.

 

[Arnadath]

Ok my opinion
Multiinstancability: [8/10]
Commands: [10/10]
Originality: [0/10]
Coding and descriptions:[5/10]

Total of 23 / 4 = 5.75/10.00 (or 2.325 / 5.00)

This camera system is really smooth, but in here are round 13~15 of such systems. And none of them, fixes basic camera problems, such as the one you get when going on a hill, or through a bridge (i tested those into your map. Also lacks description inside the trigger part. Except of that, there are also a lot of JASS systems, and this is GUI.
Try making a system, that fixes all the problems, that camera systems have generally as pointed above

Thus: [6.00/10.00]:Above mediocre

 

[Aspard]

Multiinstancability: [8/10]

Are you another retarded guy? How it can be 80% MUI? It just can BE MUI or NOT to BE MUI. There is no any so-so etc...

 

[pippo]

Are you another retarded guy? How it can be 80% MUI? It just can BE MUI or NOT to BE MUI. There is no any so-so etc...

Ye right LULZ

 

[noob134]

Can someone please tell me if this is worth keeping up or should i just remove it?

 

[Aspard]

Let it be, I think. This is better, when people have a choice. Or leave it for moderators to decide.

 

[Arnadath]

Are you another retarded guy? How it can be 80% MUI? It just can BE MUI or NOT to BE MUI. There is no any so-so etc...

It can by mui with lags etc., i count this thing also

 

[Aspard]

You sure? Example please, which bugs can occure to the MUIness if the spell is MUI?

 

[Arnadath]

I tested this thing in multiple wc3 instances in the net cafe i work in and it lags once per 3.1 second for 0.4 sec (like stop of the screen)

 

[Aspard]

How does the screen lag connected with MUIness of the system?

 

[noob134]

How does the screen lag connected with MUIness of the system?

I believe screen lag came from a leak i missed but i do not believe it has anything to do with being multi-instanceable

 

[Arnadath]

How does the screen lag connected with MUIness of the system?

In MUI, i calculate the existance of MUI (70%) and the efficiency (30%)
It is fully MUI, but lags a bit, so it gets 70% (7 points) and only 10% of efficiency (1 point)

 

[Aspard]

Then you should name it coding
However, coding and descriptions should be seperated.

Usually people mark MUI as additional plus, not as part of smth.

 

[Tallex]

It's okey.. But can you take away the god damn dialogs and just bind the camera to the unit you chose? That would be alot better.