Sry the terrain of your map.... makes a difference? Not really.
- terrain could be a bit better, it looks too unvaried
If raid1000 doesn't do a good job in the terrain, I would not accept his work. Infact, I had view most of the wc3c cinematic map with forest scenery. Most of it have a similiar scenery of such a forest.
Infact, just take a look at how a natural forest look like.
I was accurate and gave detailed information about what i miss. I didn't miss things because of viewing it only once (which is not true btw).
Ok, let's browse back at what you said.
-
how about adding fog? or other weather effects? (rain+thunder... wohoo

)
You said it was accurate, but if you review does. How come you suggest it should have fog when it already does had it?
If it was accurate, how come you miss it? Just take a look at this first screenshot, if you view the starting cinematic; you would notice it was quite foggy.
There is a obvious contradiction over this constructive critism of yours regarding the fog.
- at the beginning you showed the richness of detail on the character, i´m missing this during the fight (enclose your camera paths to the warriors)
The camera was actually quite close to the warrior during the battle scenery.
If I make it any closer, it would eventually make the model invisible or goes through it. Take a look at some battle cinematic. Those distance are usually as close as this state.
I have make a research to a few excellent battle cinematic such as The Spirit of Vengeance, most of it have such a distance.
Edit: Btw: Regarding the lag at the final effect waves: i don´t know if it works, but try preloading your effects during map initialization by casting them somewhere on the map once. That works for heros, maybe it works for special effects too.
I eventually just remember, maybe the 5 user I tested this map with have quite a high ram for their computer and good connection; rendering it to no lag at all.
Can you tell me what is your computer ram?
bounty hunter2 tell me he have a lemon computer, but I doesn't know what is the ram of his pc, got to ask him about it.
You told my why i'm wrong. Thats not the way you should deal with critism.
Get a step back and try to view it from another view.
If a critic is missing something, I would explain what are they missing. Just look at bounty hunter2 reply and my explaination of what he was missing.
http://www.hiveworkshop.com/forums/1005069-post5.html
http://www.hiveworkshop.com/forums/1005076-post6.html
There is nothing wrong with your review as well, all I does was explain something the you was missing. The same I does to other user if they are missing it as well.
If you visit wc3c.net, you would know how we discuss such a matter.
Also, I do not said why you are wrong. I tell you what are you missing (Such as the fog effect and camera close up to warrior during the battle).
Do not forget you write this message at the beginning.
but it i´m missing some details
I just reply it based on what you write. If you said I am wrong, then mind explain to me why you write this?