• 🏆 Texturing Contest #33 is OPEN! Contestants must re-texture a SD unit model found in-game (Warcraft 3 Classic), recreating the unit into a peaceful NPC version. 🔗Click here to enter!

Tropical Blue Frog.blp

I little skin I made just for fun!

239559-albums7779-picture101147.jpg

Give credit if you use it !

Uptades :
1 - I had a mouth, sharpenned the body and increased the colors.

Keywords:
frog, forest, blue, dart, tropical, teal, rainforest, toad.
Contents

Tropical Blue Frog (Texture)

Assets
Reviews
13:14, 19th Oct 2015 Kwaliti: Useful enough, considering how crappy the model's unwrap actually is.

Moderator

M

Moderator

13:14, 19th Oct 2015
Kwaliti:

Useful enough, considering how crappy the model's unwrap actually is.
 
I̶t̶'̶s̶ ̶j̶u̶s̶t̶ ̶a̶ ̶r̶e̶c̶o̶l̶o̶r̶ ̶a̶c̶c̶o̶r̶d̶i̶n̶g̶ ̶t̶o̶ ̶t̶h̶e̶ ̶r̶u̶l̶e̶s̶ ̶a̶n̶d̶ ̶r̶e̶s̶o̶u̶r̶c̶e̶s̶. Whether this is useful or not moderator shall decide. I'd say this is too simple but useful.

Ps: Frogs look ugly in War3...
 
Last edited:
Luv it coz it's unique, i dont care if it is simple. ^^

It's just a recolor according to the rules and resources
Nope >.>
attachment.php
skins_5437_preview.jpg


Frogs look ugly in War3
You should probably know how to use small stuffs, don't scale 'em high.
 

Attachments

  • FrogSkin.jpg
    FrogSkin.jpg
    3 KB · Views: 2,601
Luv it coz it's unique, i dont care if it is simple. ^^


Nope >.>
attachment.php
skins_5437_preview.jpg



You should probably know how to use small stuffs, don't scale 'em high.

Maybe it's not a recolor,? He should have at-least made a high resolution texture for the frog, like 512x512 or 256x256.

Also, where is the face? Why is the skin so undefined? Why on earth would such textures be approved?
 
Also, where is the face? Why is the skin so undefined? Why on earth would such textures be approved?

Why shouldn't it be approved? We all know that frog based skins were approved before; with good results as well.

@Windrunner29, I would use a bit of sharpen on it to give it more clarity since it's a bit blob-like.
Try to work more on the face, maybe give it a proper mouth.
Perhaps even giving it an exotic skin.

for. e.g this or this.
 
Why shouldn't it be approved? We all know that frog based skins were approved before; with good results as well.

@Windrunner29, I would use a bit of sharpen on it to give it more clarity since it's a bit blob-like.
Try to work more on the face, maybe give it a proper mouth.
Perhaps even giving it an exotic skin.

for. e.g this or this.

Back then resource rules were different. The skin - Lemming you showed me is 2x times better in quality than this. If we all started doing these types of texture edits it would flood the server with useless junk that probably nobody will ever use.

I agree about giving it a better "face". :/
 
Level 18
Joined
Jul 28, 2014
Messages
1,080
Heinvers said:
maybe give it a proper mouth.

The mouth make it looks more like a frog I think. thanks you for the suggestion!

Heinvers said:
Perhaps even giving it an exotic skin.

Sorry but I don't understand this :(

A Void said:
Ps: Frogs look ugly in War3...

239559-albums7779-picture101148.jpg


Edit :


A Void said:
If we all started doing these types of texture edits it would flood the server with useless junk that probably nobody will ever use.

It's not one day that the skin is online, you can't just say that it's useless and that nobody will use it! If you don't like it, nothing force you to use it.
 
Yes, why on earth would I as a map maker(for example) use this when I can use the high quality one?
Please stop, if you dont really like it then go on. I find this useful, and i believe there are also map makers who see its usefulness.

I used it anyway.

---

Funny, we're arguing because of this simple creep.
 
Ok people, here's my opinion, the frog is good as it is.
First reason: the model itself is extremely low quality
Second reason: texture is small as well, and it is meant to be that way..
Third reason: the model is a critter, which is not meant to be scaled to massive proportions
Fourth reason: Un-necessary amount of details will lag the game and render the skin even less useful
Fifth reason: You A-void, are being demanding and toxic about it.. and i already reported you on it :/

anyone else that's being problematic? >_>

anyway.. Windrunner29, i don't really know where the eyes of that frog are on the texture, but try to find out and give them some sort of a tiny shine, a'right?
 
Fifth reason: You A-void, are being demanding and toxic about it.. and i already reported you on it :/

anyone else that's being problematic? >_>

anyway.. Windrunner29, i don't really know where the eyes of that frog are on the texture, but try to find out and give them some sort of a tiny shine, a'right?

Why are you being so sensitive about this? Reported me for writing negative criticism? So there should only be positive criticism? You're a little paranoid about this, making a big deal out of this. This was already over, nothing serious.

If you see toxicity in negative criticism then I'm sorry for you. I wasn't rude or anything, I just said that this texture is awful. Then a conversation began on opinions. People see bad things where there are none just to get attention.

Fine, this is the best texture in the world. Make more of these, 5/5
 
Level 21
Joined
Nov 4, 2013
Messages
2,017
I don't see anything wrong with a very simple skin. If people will find it useful for their maps then why depriving them of such resource? I agree that the skin is extremely plain but it ain't a good reason to exclude it from the approved resources. People seem to like it and, in the end, the aim of custom resources is not satisfying moderators but satisfying downloaders (I apply the same logic when I moderate maps).
If I were a skin moderator, I'd approve this with no rating and drop some suggestions for improvements.

A Void, I'd just like to ask you "Have you ever heard this?"

One man's trash is another man's treasure

If a resource is not useful for you, it doesn't it will not be useful for everybody.
 

Deleted member 238226

D

Deleted member 238226

there's too much drama in here :)

anyway, i find this frog skin is quite cool.

4/5 +rep

edit : i want to rep you but i need to spread some first
 
Level 30
Joined
Jan 31, 2010
Messages
3,551
For such a small size this skin beats it, but I'd rather like to see you try to do different eyes. Frogs have the weirdo big eyes and that could make the frog look more appealing.

The execution is fantastical. If I remember correctly, the only thing that's even worse to skin than the frog is probably the Harpy texture. Good job!
 
Level 21
Joined
Jul 6, 2014
Messages
6,791
You...made a frog skin?interesting
One thing that really stands out to me is the eyes,it looks odd
Other than that I feel this is useful so Ill give it a 3/5
 
Level 18
Joined
Jul 28, 2014
Messages
1,080
That_Guy_There said:
Aww...What a cute frog
I'll have you for dinner

Are you saying that because I'm french :D

Warseeker said:
Looks interesting and Nice!! Btw the original frog model made by Blizzard is not really... cool, he need update! Anyway, it's looks much better with this new skin you made!

The model needs an uptade that's sure!
 
Top