- Joined
- Nov 27, 2004
- Messages
- 153
Okay, I am really sick of those idiots who keep giving 5/5 to something they really like, and a 1/5 on what they don't like...
Let me remind you guys how it goes.
1/5 = This sucks.
2/5 = It needs improvement.
3/5 = Good, and useful.
4/5 = Full of effort.
5/5 = Really perfect.
Really, I'm sick of you guys saying: WHY THE HELL DID YOU RATE THIS A 3/5?! I WORKED HOURS ON THIS!
And I'm also sick of: THIS THING WILL HELP ME ALOT ON MY CAMPAIGN! 5/5!!!
You guys have no common sense I suppose.
People are always flaming me, because they think they're stuff are so good, but I rated them a 3/5 or a 4/5...
The stuff I rate a 3/5 or 4/5 are the content that have effort and quality. A rating of 5/5 would mean that it could win a Director's Choice award.
The only stuff I rate a 1/5, are the skins that are just bad paint attempts and recolors, and models that are simply a merge of weapons, and heads...
-_- To Olofmoleman, I didn't rate your Darthfett model a 3/5 because it sucked. I rated it a 3/5 because it's not perfect. Perfect models that deserve a 5/5 are the ones in the Director's choice category...
Models that deserve a 4/5 are started from scratch, or geo-reskinned that it looks like a completely new thing. Your darthfett model is not perfect, or made from scratch, or a geo-reskin that is unnoticable.
You took my comment the wrong way...
From where I'm standing, this is how the site rates stuff:
1/5: So useless...
5/5: Man, this is so good!
....What you guys maybe doing is encouraging the newbies to upload more crap, and discourage the skilled ones from submitting anymore.
I suggest you people take a look of the different submissions on the site, and compare the differences in quality and effort.
Let me remind you guys how it goes.
1/5 = This sucks.
2/5 = It needs improvement.
3/5 = Good, and useful.
4/5 = Full of effort.
5/5 = Really perfect.
Really, I'm sick of you guys saying: WHY THE HELL DID YOU RATE THIS A 3/5?! I WORKED HOURS ON THIS!
And I'm also sick of: THIS THING WILL HELP ME ALOT ON MY CAMPAIGN! 5/5!!!
You guys have no common sense I suppose.
People are always flaming me, because they think they're stuff are so good, but I rated them a 3/5 or a 4/5...
The stuff I rate a 3/5 or 4/5 are the content that have effort and quality. A rating of 5/5 would mean that it could win a Director's Choice award.
The only stuff I rate a 1/5, are the skins that are just bad paint attempts and recolors, and models that are simply a merge of weapons, and heads...
-_- To Olofmoleman, I didn't rate your Darthfett model a 3/5 because it sucked. I rated it a 3/5 because it's not perfect. Perfect models that deserve a 5/5 are the ones in the Director's choice category...
Models that deserve a 4/5 are started from scratch, or geo-reskinned that it looks like a completely new thing. Your darthfett model is not perfect, or made from scratch, or a geo-reskin that is unnoticable.
You took my comment the wrong way...
From where I'm standing, this is how the site rates stuff:
1/5: So useless...
5/5: Man, this is so good!
....What you guys maybe doing is encouraging the newbies to upload more crap, and discourage the skilled ones from submitting anymore.
I suggest you people take a look of the different submissions on the site, and compare the differences in quality and effort.