Which one is better (writing game rules)

[Kazeon]

I'm writing down a set of game rules. These rules are basically trying to explain a same thing. So which one do you think is better and more understandable? Or a hybrid of those two maybe? Let me know your opinion

1.

1. One match consists of 4 rounds. Each round lasts for 1 minute.
2. At the end of every round, the battle zone area size will be gradually reduced.
3. Players leaving the battle zone will take minor damage every second.
4. Player must be the top 3 survivor among the other 11 players to win the match.
5. The top 3 winners will receive additional gold reward and a medal upgrade.
6. Remaining players will only receive participation reward.
7. The last 3-ranked players will have their medals downgraded.

2.

1. The match lasts for 4 minutes.
2. Every 60 seconds, the size of the battle zone area will be gradually reduced.
3. Players who leave the battle zone will experience minor damage every second.
4. Players who become the top 3 ranking will receive additional gold prizes and increase medals.
5. The remaining players will only receive participation prizes.
6. The 3 last ranked players will get their medals down.

 

[Naze]

2nd one I guess. Also breaking down 1 match into 4 rounds sounds like unnecessary information considering nowadays' attention span standards, so that's another reason why 2nd one is good