No, it was philosophy, not autopsy.
hmmmm isn't Philosophy subjective?
So was the test on the morals and ethics of a philosophy or was it more so about famous philosophers?
I was asked to elaborate on Aristotle's idea of knowledge; how it is obtained, what it is and what the item or object of/for knowledge is. Furthermore, I had to discuss Immanuel Kant's
Critique of Pure Reason. Lastly, they wanted me to talk about relativism and then specifically the opinions of Fred Feldman - particularly his idea of tolerance in relation to relativism, or various forms of relativism.
I also managed to mix in some David Hume, because he's got some quite interesting concepts running, and he's a great philosopher to compare the others with, as there are less of the famous philosophers who are like him (at least according to my interpretations).
No subjective opinions, no, it's more of a Philosophical
History class.
I guess that it was general knowledge test...seen those...the point of them is that you have to show that you aren't a total asshole which searches for Kyle...
Hmm? You sure those aren't psychology studies of oneself?
Philosophy?
I always failed those, because they wanted me to fill in the most "catholic" answers at my crappy school. For instance, is it right to kill a terrorist for the sake of millions?
Apparantly killing anyone sends you to hell.
You were literally brainwashed and required to answer according to the doctrine in order to succeed? I guess that goes under Religion classes.
Oh, and on a last note, no, I do not actually
study philosophy, it was a mandatory subject for my bachelor-grade.