Text inside a .highlight tag still parses "@soemthing" as a user tag

[HappyTauren]

So in the news post submission by Frotty, there's code like this placed in the highlight tag.

[USER=179970]@Test[/USER] function testAdd()
   new HashList<int>..add(5).get(0).assertEquals(5)

...which has the code annotation @Test replaced by a user tag. Obviously it should just be @Test instead.

The general solution is using the code=wurst instead of highlight=wurst.

@Test function testAdd()
   new HashList<int>..add(5).get(0).assertEquals(5)

...but the highlight tags still needs to be fixed.

 

[GhostWolf]

Why is [code] parsed by the forum at all?

 

[HappyTauren]

Well the thing is, [code] isn't, but [highlight] is.

 

[Ralle]

@hey

[USER=212675]@hey[/USER]

Crap.

Ah well... [XF1] UserTagging breaking my custom BB codes

 

[GhostWolf]

To be fair, highlight isn't needed anymore if code supports the same syntax. This thread probably contains a major number of the people who even know of its existence

But yes, wanting control over what elements you want transformed by the forum software seems like a pretty basic thing to me.

 

[Kyrbi0]

This thread probably contains a major number of the people who even know of its existence .

Not anymore. ; P