RockGolem

[Moderator]

Wolverabid
7/10
TempleGuardian looks great and performs well. The texture files are not needed.

 

[Illidan_09]

it's nice, i mean this could be useful

 

[Mantra]

kk but isn't this a skin? I don't see any changes in the model from the ss. or is it the spikes on his hands?

 

[Amdor]

yes, and some little calibrations, and this is in "model-skins"

 

[armel]

It must not have been too much work, but the result is cool and can be useful, and that's what counts, so 5/5

 

[Meta Ridley]

does it have different animations?

 

[/\/\onkey-/\/\agic]

This is in model skins. . .LOL. . . that is for skins of models that people make not blizzards :evil:

 

[Deathbringer]

Yeah! Finally a new golem, i was getting sick of plain rock golems, anything tileset specific looking rox!
5/5 Great Job!

(Just noticed, anything that has the icon WITH the model gets a plus in my book)
I'd like to see someone modify the golem with a magma looking skin and maybe some model changes, like the magma giant in the skins section. Amdor maybe you wanna try this?

 

[Sundance]

This looks nice... But really not a 5.. a 5 means perfect or so damn good it cannot be improved..

The changes to the model are minor. The skin is nice even though it is (according to my eye) a cnp of a tileset.. nothing wrong with that btw!!!! 3/5 as the model nearly hasn't been altered.

 

[Wolverabid]

[5] Nothing fancy here, just a simple useful model.

 

[Mun'ki]

Face looks goofy
4/5

 

[Lingonberryjam]

Wolverabid
7/10
TempleGuardian looks great and performs well. The texture files are not needed.

It doesnt perform well to me. The spikes on the hands loosen from the hands while walking. Do you have problems with this?
Is the model updated and those bugs removed?

 

[little white]

wo~~