MineWorld 3.0

[Moderator]

20:32, 30th Jan 2010
Rui: You must improve your map description for your map to be approved here. You were inclusively warned by the users who took the time to leave a comment.
Rejected (until updated).

 

[Feorix]

please a better description...

 

[RaijinSpark]

yep, or it will be rejected by mods.

 

[ShadowDemonLord]

This map has a good picture, but no description! Thats what a good map needs. Not just "minimap, get the fuck over it..." Add something like screenshots, what your supposed to do, you know like advertisment! Thats what a good description and map has.

 

[Nherwyziant]

mini-game... xD

 

[Lag_Reviews]

Sounds awesome Fail Description

Omg looks and sounds awesome although FIX THE DESCRIPTION PLEASE!

Btw fix the description please!

Things you could add to the description:

• Credits
• Screenshots
• Gameplay
• Background info
• Youtube video
• Change-log
• Upcoming update log

If you need more help on the description go here: http://www.hiveworkshop.com/forums/tutorial-submission-283/importance-description-127031/#post1117301

I vote for: Rejection (Until you fix description)

Anyhowz will download it once description is A+,
Lag_Reviews

 

[RaidonGod]

facepalm!

 

[Opus Nocturne]

no description...

 

[Dwarf_King]

Unlike everyone else here, I actually tested the map. First, please fix the item descriptions. I couldn't tell what anything did or what it was even called, same with the characters. Second as everyone else has been complaining about, please add a description and credits. Nice skins and good terrain for this kind of map though. 1/5 until above is fixed. Then it could be a 3 or 4.

 

[Lag_Reviews]

Unlike everyone else here, I actually tested the map. First, please fix the item descriptions. I couldn't tell what anything did or what it was even called, same with the characters. Second as everyone else has been complaining about, please add a description and credits. Nice skins and good terrain for this kind of map though. 1/5 until above is fixed. Then it could be a 3 or 4.

There is no point in testing a map that has no description as it could just be a virus map as we have no proof of anything that lies inside it.

Plus if a map has no description over time it will be rejected any ways even if it was a good map.

Although if the owner cares about the map (As he doesn't because he didn't change the description, he thinks this is epicwar ) I'm sure he will love the review.

Anyhowz that's my say,
Lag_Reviews