• Listen to a special audio message from Bill Roper to the Hive Workshop community (Bill is a former Vice President of Blizzard Entertainment, Producer, Designer, Musician, Voice Actor) 🔗Click here to hear his message!
  • Read Evilhog's interview with Gregory Alper, the original composer of the music for WarCraft: Orcs & Humans 🔗Click here to read the full interview.
  • 💡 We're thrilled to announce that our upcoming texturing contest is in the works, and we're eager to hear your suggestions! Please take this opportunity to share your ideas in this theme discussion thread for the Texturing Contest #34!
  • 🏆 Hive's 7th HD Modeling Contest: Icecrown Creature is now open! The frozen wastes of Icecrown are home to some of Azeroth’s most terrifying and resilient creatures. For this contest, your challenge is to design and model a HD 3D monster that embodies the cold, undead, and sinister essence of Icecrown! 📅 Submissions close on April 13, 2025. Don't miss this opportunity to let your creativity shine! Enter now and show us your frozen masterpiece! 🔗 Click here to enter!

Flying unit stack problems

Status
Not open for further replies.
Level 2
Joined
Jun 28, 2009
Messages
22
if you compare the collision size of a flying unit and a land unit, you will see that the value of "Pathing - Collision Size" is "8" for almost every flying unit, while land units usually have the value 31-48...

change the collision size and make sure their movement type is "fly"...

give rep...:D
 
Level 2
Joined
Jun 27, 2009
Messages
10
It is already set to true but still stack together ><"

What i did is:

Movement - Group Separation - Enabled: True

Pathing - Collision Size : 0.00

I don't want it to be stuck and is able to go through each other.
 
Level 2
Joined
Jun 27, 2009
Messages
10
*bump*

Anyone know of a way to separate them???
This definitely will help not only me but others as well.

did set the group separation to true and false. (doesn't help)
added collision size. (doesn't help either)


any other method?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top