[Trigger] Does this will sync?

[Almia]

the title says it.
Please read the code:

[trigger=]Test
Events
Conditions
Actions
Custom Script:if GetLocalPlayer() == udg_Player then
Unit - Hide Unit
Destructible - Hide Destructible
Custom Script:endif[/trigger]

 

[Lender]

well, if that unit is just for cinematics or things like that , then it should sync
but as soon as the unit locally hided interracts with anything, I think it cause desync

so keep this in mind.

 

[Almia]

Uhmm,this is for MUI system so i would like to ask if the unit will be shown only to the GetLocalPlayer()

 

[Lender]

No, cuz you locally hide it. So only local player won't see the unit

Do this:

• Blahblah
  • Events
  • Conditions
  • Actions
    • Unit - Hide Unit
    • Destructible - Hide Des
    • Custom script: if GetLocalPlayer() == udg_Player then
    • Unit - Unhide Unit
    • Destructible - Unhide Des
    • Custom script: endif

 

[Almia]

Sorry for my grammar hehe.

 

[Lender]

whops, I think that I was wrong about this.

Any data that is stored in the general handle table (not its own index) can't be local. This includes data like units and so on (agents). Any data that uses its own counter can be local.

It seems then the code will desync:S

 

[Spartipilo]

Why don't you test?

I think it desync.

 

[PurgeandFire]

whops, I think that I was wrong about this.



It seems then the code will desync:S

Nestharus' statement refers to the handle stack. Most agents are placed on the same handle stack, starting from 0x100000 and increasing from then on. However, there are a few handle types (texttags, ubersplats, etc.) that have a separate stack (0 to 99) which can be created locally.

However, this only is an issue when you are creating or destroying something within a local handle block. In the case of the OP, he is just hiding it. It won't immediately desync, but you are correct on this statement:

but as soon as the unit locally hided interracts with anything, I think it cause desync

The interaction can cause a desync. Most widgets behave this way if I'm not mistaken. Usually destructables are fine because we don't do anything with them anyway, but units can be problematic because in most cases we want to do something with them.

 

[Arhowk]

The code will desync, but it wont if the unit has "Locust" and the destructible cannot be destroyed or interacted with

 

[Almia]

im just making a custom window so does this will dessync?

 

[Spartipilo]

Hiding windows is different than hiding units. Hiding local windows doesn't desync.

 

[Magtheridon96]

Look.

It will not desync UNLESS:

- You actually have checks that do a certain set of actions that modify the handle table depending on whether a unit is hidden or not.
- Another player interacts with the destructable/unit that's hidden for another player.

Anything that can get code to run on one player's computer and not the other can end up desyncing the game if the handle table, or even the STRING table is modified.

 

[ck5524209]

I think you can try to change a unit's alpha.

 

[defskull]

What I understand is that;
You should not have any actions that allow the game to interact with that Unit/Destructible such as Pick Every Unit/Destructible Action.

 

[Almia]

^ i have already understood it.

 

[Arhowk]

I think you can try to change a unit's alpha.

please dont necro threads.. this one isnt that old but its been solved

anyway, hes talking about units hes talking bout structibles