• Listen to a special audio message from Bill Roper to the Hive Workshop community (Bill is a former Vice President of Blizzard Entertainment, Producer, Designer, Musician, Voice Actor) 🔗Click here to hear his message!
  • Read Evilhog's interview with Gregory Alper, the original composer of the music for WarCraft: Orcs & Humans 🔗Click here to read the full interview.

Demolish not working so pisseed

Status
Not open for further replies.
Level 8
Joined
Jul 25, 2006
Messages
177
I have remade the Demolish ability gave it a 10% chance to proc for 30 times normal damage on buildings. Gave the ability to a tower/building. It never procs. The world editor is pissing me off. I've spent loads of time on this and its so silly because there's no reason it shouldn't be working...
 

Dr Super Good

Spell Reviewer
Level 64
Joined
Jan 18, 2005
Messages
27,258
By proc I take it you mean procedure. As WE has no procedures it is logical it will never have one. If you mean process, all spells are procesed on map load, thus even your spell will be processed, you can not give a spell a 10% chance to be loaded on map load.
 
Level 2
Joined
Feb 7, 2009
Messages
17
by Proc he means Processed Randomized Occurrence (I believe is what Proc stands for if i remember correctly... either way its used to mean "chance on hit") Edit: Upon checking his link, i guess maybe i was mistaken and it does stand for procedure, dunno where i heard the above - either way its still meant to mean chance on hit.

As for why its not working, I'm not sure. I'll play around with it in my editor and see if I can get it to work.

Edit: I just got mine working.

in Abilities > Demolish, I changed:
Data - Chance to Demolish to 50%
Data - Damage Multiplier (to buildings): 30.00

I then made a bunch of ziggurats and a tinker that could use robo-goblin at lvl 1. he did 10 dmg per hit a few times and then he did 300 damage.
I'll try it at a lower percentage, and see if for some reason it breaks.

Edit 2: Still works for me at 10% proc rate.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top