Castle Defence V1.00

[Moderator]

02:39, 3rd Feb 2009
Septimus: poor development and i already state my reason while i am still a mini-mod.

 

[cool_is_i]

Nice description there
By description, it means the map description, not your description...

 

[ProfessorZmurge]

Why the hell we need your number O_O
No one gonna have phone sex with you (I think...)

 

[bounty hunter2]

is that a telephone number? Lol description of your map please...

Here is my rating and comment:

1 - 10 points go on originality
1 - 10 points go on object editor work
1 - 10 points go on scripting 1 - 10 points go on terrain
1 - 10 points go on bug free
1 - 10 points go on gameplay*/fun factor
1 - 10 points go on lag
1 - 10 points go on proper submission and crediting
-------------------------------------------------
->That equals 80 points max.
-------------------------------------------------
+ Cinematic
1 - 10 points on camera work
1 - 10 points on dialog
1 - 10 points on music and or voice acting
- Cinematic
Object editor work
* Not in cinematic
-------------------------------------------------
That equals 100 points max.
To get a Hive grade over 1/5 at least 50% of the 80 (Triggered map) or of the 100 (Cinematic map) points is needed. That means at least 40 or 50 points. However if a map gets rated over 1/5 by me, that doesn't mean that I will imidietly vote it to be approved.

Originality: 2 points
A too simple castle war map with nothing original in it.

Object editor work: 2 points
Hotkeys, hotkeys, hotkeys. You don't have them, you didn't change the warcraft ones.

Scripting: 1 point
There were maybe 3 triggers that are bad. No victory defeat condition whatsoever.

Terrain: 1 point
You just raised some cliffs. A lot of work here.

Bug Free: 2 points
Considering the fact that you can't win the game, it should work properly.

Gameplay/Fun Factor: 3 point
Nothing special to make it fun to play.

Lag: 8 points
No lag, fine loading time.

Proper submission and crediting: 1 point
You didn't made a description of the map properly, didn't attach images, didn't credit the authors. Credit the model authors!

In overall: 20 / 80
25% minimal 50% not met.
For the hive grade: 1/5 I suggest this map for: Rejection
-------------------------------------------------
In overall it is a map that doesn't have a bright spot. You require a lot more learning and improving before actually getting anything approved. Learn and improve and try again. For now very bad.

Good Luck in improving, bounty hunter2
I might not be checking this topic for some time. If you have any questions about the review or you update the map and want me to check it again, feel free to PM me or Visitor message me at any time.

 

[Septimus]

1) Poorly develop terrain.
2) Poor description.
3) Breaking the rules of hiveworkshop.
4) Defective coding.
5) No credit to resoures usage, breaking the rules of hiveworkshop.
6) Invalid hotkey.

Very poorly develop map.

1/5 and mini moderator vote was REJECTED

 

[-LwO-EdGaRd]

^^