Call of Duty 5

[Ghost765]

how is it disrespectful?
i preferred the russian missions over the marine raiders since i just hate jungle warfare. more of a city fight, storm the building person.

 

[WILL THE ALMIGHTY]

how is it disrespectful?
i preferred the russian missions over the marine raiders since i just hate jungle warfare. more of a city fight, storm the building person.

Just listen to the Russian commander. And the americans. Hell, its almost racist. The trailers focused on gory awesome ''War is hell and cool and shit''. And the setting is just getting milked.

 

[Ghost765]

what about the commander? hes like "dimitry! lead the charge!" in his russian accent.
and he says comrade.
what the americans saying rascist stuff towards the japs? well thats how it was. hell, i wouldnt blame em. after all, japs dropped 'nades when they were surrendering. tey ah dirty azn.

 

[thegreatsmite]

War is Hell! Cod5 isn't real war! look what i learned! sure Cod is based off of WWII but cod...isnt...WWII...

 

[Dreadnought[dA]]

If you have 4, is there really any reason to buy 5? #4 is pretty amazing, and I like the futuristic combat more than WW2, and they said they made CoD5 using the same game engine so what's the point?

 

[Gilles]

If you have 4, is there really any reason to buy 5? #4 is pretty amazing, and I like the futuristic combat more than WW2, and they said they made CoD5 using the same game engine so what's the point?

Waste your $70. The game is also overpriced. I can get 4 or about $25, and it's a better game.

 

[WILL THE ALMIGHTY]

I fail to understand how anyone could possibly want to play a Call of Duty game set in World War 2 anymore.

 

[Ghost765]

cause u play as the Reds. and u get to kill nazi Z's and get a Ray Gun

 

[thegreatsmite]

I fail to understand how anyone could possibly want to play a Call of Duty game set in World War 2 anymore.

because clearly not everyone in the world own a bagillion WWII games, so they dont actualy care. I can't deny that cod4 was good, but if people dont care about the game setting, cod5 is a much better multiplayer based game and i personaly think, just a better game overall. so if you saw a WWII shooter, you wouldnt play just becasue it was based in WWII? if its a good game, it a good game!


gameplay > game setting

 

[Gilles]

because clearly not everyone in the world own a bagillion WWII games, so they dont actualy care. I can't deny that cod4 was good, but if people dont care about the game setting, cod5 is a much better multiplayer based game and i personaly think, just a better game overall. so if you saw a WWII shooter, you wouldnt play just becasue it was based in WWII? if its a good game, it a good game!


gameplay > game setting

Because using old shitty guns, that have shitty aimers, just isn't as much fun as running around with an AK. Modern is just more fun. The gameplay for CoD4 looks better than CoD5.

 

[Ghost765]

So...you would play WaW if they had laser sights on a M1?
Seriously, the guns arent that bad. The semi-automatics either get you in critical with a single shot or kill you.

 

[Oziris]

Yeap there isn't a editor, i played Cull of Duty 5. :/

 

[Ghost765]

why would u want an editor in CoD5?

 

[thegreatsmite]

Yeap there isn't a editor, i played Cull of Duty 5. :/

if you want an editor so badly, then get Farcry 2...

 

[LordDz]

if you want an editor so badly, then get Farcry 2...

Except it failed.
No AI support = bad.

 

[Anufrijevas]

I bet they won't, and I bet it's gonna suck. I wish they'd stick with modern war.

Trey Arch are the Call of Duties that are not numbered

Infinity Ward are the Numbered Call of Duty titles