A new judging system, the F2J ?

[Vladadamm]

I saw that in some contest the hive don't have enough judges, so this new judging system will counter this problem.

The F2J (Free To Judge) is a system which with all can judge any submission.

The judging rules of the Free To Judge (or F2J) :

Everyone can judge a submission.
You cant judge your own submission.
Every judgement must respect the notations criteres.
Every judgement must be neutral.
Every judgement must be say in a post in the Contest Thread (or the Contest Judging Thread if it exists).
Every judgement must be posted with some explications.
You aren't obligate to judge all submissions.
A troll-judgement won't be count in the submission's note.
The final note of a submission is equal to (Note1 + Note2 + Note3 + ... + LastNote) / NumberOfNotes

 

[Aeroblyctos]

You mean in map section or what?

 

[Maker]

Not everyone has the capability to judge submissions. So someone would have to evaluate the judgements.

For example in a Zephyr challenge (which emphasizes coding), a judge would have to have good knowledge of coding, like spotting leaks and efficiency issues.

 

[fladdermasken]

If this is ever mandated, I'll incite rebellion amongst the darkest conservatives of the Hive.

 

[Pharaoh_]

This system still requires a supervisor, to have a look at how the judging is done, what kind of criteria have been kept in mind or what submission is the "non-trolling" one.

There is something that cannot be controlled: how neutral that person can be.

Judging every submission should be a must, otherwise the system becomes automatically weak.

 

[Deleted member 157129]

This wouldn't work, because in order to figure out whether or not a "public judge" is neutral, you'd have to judge as well. This will generate more work than it eliminates.

 

[eubz]

Not everyone has the capability to judge submissions. So someone would have to evaluate the judgements.

For example in a Zephyr challenge (which emphasizes coding), a judge would have to have good knowledge of coding, like spotting leaks and efficiency issues.

This^
Because a judge must have a thorough knowledge about that particular "subject" he is to judge with. How can you judge a thing if you don't know about it. And I say a judge should be very much familiar, and not only familiar but with an in-depth knowledge, about what he will deal with.

 

[Skycraft]

Why would you want to let complete randoms judge without knowing anything about how to judge?
You are silly, very silly.

 

[Just_Spectating]

the best judging system is how we already have it
and if everyone can be very patient, there is no need to change it

 

[Dr. House]

=.= i voted yes while i wanted no =.= ''its what they call fail''

 

[HailFireer]

You aren't obliged to judge all submissions? That can lead to someone having 50 judges and someone 3. That can be a problem. It will be a problem.

Current system just needs some tweaks, not entire change of it.

 

[Apheraz Lucent]

We can easily delay contest a bit to find proper judges. Allowing everyone to put their minds and ruin the contest? No.