WW2 Spanish Civil War 3.26

[Moderator]

ap0: Rejected

21:54, 8th Apr 2009 by bounty hunter2:
Seriously twelve players and a 4Mb map don't go together. They just don't. Rejected.

 

[Say_No_To_War]

"Seriously twelve players and a 4Mb map don't go together. They just don't. Rejected."

lol?
What a reason is this? Can you perhaps explain why you think a 12 players map may not have 4 MB?
Its a map near the 2nd World War. As you can imagine WC3 has not many standard models for such a scenery. I dont like using WC3 models which would destroy the whole optics.
So please explain me why it has been rejected.

"This map is rejected and can cause errors." - lol

 

[Mechanical Man]

You took long to discover that your map is rejected.

And that about causing errors is just default hive message for rejected maps.

 

[Say_No_To_War]

You took long to discover that your map is rejected.

And that about causing errors is just default hive message for rejected maps.

I know, still it sounds funny for a stable release after 2 years of work and hundreds of games. And yes, it took long. It just disapeared from my ressources so I thought it was deleted. Didnt see this needs fix area.

I wonder what I shall fix...

 

[Tyrlop]

ive just tried the map and damn its a nice one, mini world war two. funner because its only one country and not the whole europe map.

 

[Tau Empire]

Dam now I know why it's called the Forgotten War, cause hardly anyone here knew there was one to begin with lol. To focused on Germany and Japan to notice Spain at all.

 

[ashbringer753]

u should try delete some players the admin may accept it then

 

[Eragon]

He Shouldn't have to modify a perfectly good map just to get it passed by some admins that obviously didn't play the map, i've hosted it several times, got games and no crashes. GO TO WC3DIPLO!

 

[Tau Empire]

Well what can I say? Although he said 12 players + 4.0 MB don't work fine, which is the biggest lie I have seen. He's still human and makes mistake.

If you complain about how pathedic he reviewed the map go to the forums fine Map Moderator contact or something like that. Tell the mods that you need a 2nd reviewer cause of a poorly done review. Then quote what the reviwer said. Then wait for the 2nd review to see if it's accepted or not.

 

[EagleMan]

Commenting on the player number and map size is a pretty bad way to grade something. It may be indicative of something, but it is by no means objective. It's sort of like a teacher grading an essay by the number of words it has alone, or just on its MLA. The acception/rejection was given no effort at all as far as I can tell.

 

[PurplePoot]

The point is that it's essentially impossible to get 12 people to sit around downloading a 4mb map. Even 2 or 3mb is difficult.

 

[Mechanical Man]

thats why I encourage to do AI

 

[Say_No_To_War]

"The point is that it's essentially impossible to get 12 people to sit around downloading a 4mb map. Even 2 or 3mb is difficult."

I wonder what upstream you people have. I never had problems getting the games full - no matter what filesize it has. Btw I only have 64 KB/s upstream - still only about 60s for a dl.

Btw: Warcraft 3 without ghost is a peer 2 peer network. If someone else with a portforward joins and finishes the download people can also download from that person. I nearly never had to wait long for downloads.

At last since the time of hosting-bots this is not a reason to reject any map.

"Seriously twelve players and a 4Mb map don't go together. They just don't. Rejected." - rofl

 

[Tau Empire]

"The point is that it's essentially impossible to get 12 people to sit around downloading a 4mb map. Even 2 or 3mb is difficult."

I wonder what upstream you people have. I never had problems getting the games full - no matter what filesize it has. Btw I only have 64 KB/s upstream - still only about 60s for a dl.

Btw: Warcraft 3 without ghost is a peer 2 peer network. If someone else with a portforward joins and finishes the download people can also download from that person. I nearly never had to wait long for downloads.

At last since the time of hosting-bots this is not a reason to reject any map.

"Seriously twelve players and a 4Mb map don't go together. They just don't. Rejected." - rofl

Well this is hilarious do you really think that just because it's a 4 MB size with 12 players that it must be rejected? That is the saddest excuse that I ever heard from a guy who probably still uses dial-up services. Heck I've seen 6 MB with 12 players and no one is complaining about it.

BTW I'm not pointing at you Say No To War I'm pointing at this so called map moderator who has no actual skills in reviewing something seriously... to reject just because of his shitty Internet. Ya sure I might get warned, banned or whatever after this but I had to express the stupidity of this situation.

 

[Cweener]

Mass Purging Template Version 4.0
Rejection

Reason for not approving: