I can't find it.2. Select Wurst Project as wizard and press next
uhmm, less things to worry about?Nestharus said:Wurst doesn't give you control over absolutely everything ; ).
i don't see why this is a problem xDNestharus said:It also doesn't follow the JASS paradigm : (.
i don't think this is a flaw of wurst but from the packageNestharus said:Already showed an example where Wurst performs in O(n) and vJASS performs in O(1) : ).
If the next pointer of a linked list is also used for the recycler stack, then all nodes on that linked list can be deallocated in O(1).
you can make your construct private and create an static method for allocationNestharus said:To solve my problem, allow users to override allocation code
package Test
function say()
print("Hello")
endfunction
init
print("Hi")
say()
endinit
endpackage
i tend to agree. for most use cases performance is not even in the top 10 of concernsThe reduced performance with all the unnecessary function calls in GUI is largely irrelevant with modern computers.
That's just how I like it. Now it's different if we're talking about machine language since everything converts to binary in the end for computer languages since that isn't able to be read easily by human eyes.
Each scripting language has their advantages and dis-advantages while VJass has nearly no dis-advantages. Also what does Eclipse have to offer for your editor besides Wurst?
not true. Jass in fact is only ran by machine that is representable in machine code, but Jass itself does not get converted to binary.
Also, check Java, Php, Javascript, Html and pretty much any language nowadays, none of them are actually compiled(I know Java has JIT), they are all interpreted.