Ogre Mound

[Moderator]

15:11, 31st Jul 2010
ap0calypse: Rejected

 

[ShAdOwdAnCer]

good terrain althought i no play yet.I will try

 

[Cweener]

Models and icon from The Hive Workshop.

You can't do that. You must credit each individual author, for each individual import he/she contributed to.

 

[Darkzealot_128]

Review

You can't do that. You must credit each individual author, for each individual import he/she contributed to.

I remember them so I will do it in a moment.

 

[Cweener]

Good. This map will be reviewed shortly(either today or tomorrow) by one of our many wonderful map reviewers, I would myself, but I've no time.

 

[Kl3sk]

Good. This map will be reviewed shortly(either today or tomorrow) by one of our many wonderful map reviewers, I would myself, but I've no time.

I'd like to say the "purging" is a good idea over-all, but if you think you can just spam "approved" or "rejected" on a map and call that an (arbitrary) vote, then there's something wrong with this initiative. I don't see how other players will know the map is worthy of being downloaded and played just by a crappy map with a "sparkly" description (much like this one). Last time I tested this map I sent the link to ap0calypse and he immediately rejected it. Of course, some maps don't deserve reviews (this one sure doesn't, no offense to the author), but "approved" / "rejected" as posts are not means of actually classifying a map's quality, now is it ?...
* In short : I find this map not worthy of a review for its bad terrain, poor game-play and no unique features over-all.

- Rating : N/A

- Voting for : Rejection!

 

[Darkzealot_128]

This map has never ever been reviewed before. All I ever wanted was for this to get reviewed. Also, have you ever opened my map?

 

[Cweener]

That is not all I am doing.
I am really going through the maps triggers and terrain and making sure they don't violate the rules.
Then ap0 will reject/approve them.
And you know what? If you'd like to go through the remaining maps and put a real review on them, then by all means, do so.
Do not however complain because I put the minimum.
I have put what is required for ap0.
Either an approve or reject, and why I did so.
Lastly, "spam"!? I was offended you'd use the word. Spam is pointless.
I am doing this for a good reason.
Don't take these as reviews, take them as moderations.
Because ultimately that's what they become.
I am sorry if I don't have the time to give a full review on 800+ maps.
I simply check for rule violations, look at the terrain and triggers, and my vote is casted based on that.

 

[dead-man-walking]

This map has never ever been reviewed before. All I ever wanted was for this to get reviewed. Also, have you ever opened my map?

As Kl3sk said: It's not worthy enough for a reviewer's precious time. A cake made from melted lead covered with pretty icing.

Kl3sk is an expert. When he says that the Terrain is bad, he really mean it.

I've seen the layout. The icy area is unnaturally placed in the middle of a lush grasslands. Unless your Map takes place in a world of anomalies, that's a bad point for you.

On a side note: Hypocrite

 

[Darkzealot_128]

This map is going to fail then. =/ I'll fix icy part.

Edit: I cannot fix anything this map is naturally bad and I can't make it much better. =/

 

[Cweener]

Hah.
That's a laugh.
Maps don't fail.
Authors do.

Simply fix whatever reviewers tell you to.
And then you will succeed.
Simple as that.