Off-Topic Moderator
- Joined
- Dec 27, 2006
- Messages
- 3,688
-
🏆 Texturing Contest #33 is OPEN! Contestants must re-texture a SD unit model found in-game (Warcraft 3 Classic), recreating the unit into a peaceful NPC version. 🔗Click here to enter!
-
It's time for the first HD Modeling Contest of 2024. Join the theme discussion for Hive's HD Modeling Contest #6! Click here to post your idea!
Nowhere Rave
- Status
- Joined
- May 7, 2010
- Messages
- 9,277
Cool, if I'd only have your determination:/
Deleted member 212788
D
Deleted member 212788
Apparently the middle of nowhere proved harder to find than I anticipated. Try smoke signals next time 
I like the atmosphere but I believe orange or yellow grass would suit better. I can also envision a sandstorm but then again, that's personal preference. I really like the background and how it fades with the sky. The speaker effects are awesome.
I like the atmosphere but I believe orange or yellow grass would suit better. I can also envision a sandstorm but then again, that's personal preference. I really like the background and how it fades with the sky. The speaker effects are awesome.
- Joined
- Jul 4, 2008
- Messages
- 1,106
What's with the grass? It's almost 2 to 3 meters high.
Right of the rave, left of the forest: You can see the end of the world.
Forest looks a bit CNP-ish.
Details for the mountains?
Could even use a very, very dim lense effect?
Right of the rave, left of the forest: You can see the end of the world.
Forest looks a bit CNP-ish.
Details for the mountains?
Could even use a very, very dim lense effect?
- Joined
- Sep 6, 2006
- Messages
- 8,873
Disappointing turn out.
Love the speakers.
The foreground looks bland in comparison. I think it's more due to the difference in texture quality than the lack of doodads though.
2. Not sure if it is. Even if it is, it looks like a foothill to that mountain anyways.
3. It is a bit, some tree variation in the back might be nice. Also maybe replacing one tree in the foreground to make it a 2-1-1 split instead of 3-1.
4. As in?! It's supposed to be far away, what detail would you see?
5. As in a lens flare? Meh. I don't personally care for them. They imply that the shot was taken with a camera, and in photography they're abused and not generally appealing. Obviously not up to me, but I decided to give my opinion.
Love the speakers.
The foreground looks bland in comparison. I think it's more due to the difference in texture quality than the lack of doodads though.
1. The grass is pretty tall. Valid point if you find it distracting. However it's more like 2-3 feet tall, not 6 feet (2 meters). Also grass can grow that tall when left unkempt.
2. Not sure if it is. Even if it is, it looks like a foothill to that mountain anyways.
3. It is a bit, some tree variation in the back might be nice. Also maybe replacing one tree in the foreground to make it a 2-1-1 split instead of 3-1.
4. As in?! It's supposed to be far away, what detail would you see?
5. As in a lens flare? Meh. I don't personally care for them. They imply that the shot was taken with a camera, and in photography they're abused and not generally appealing. Obviously not up to me, but I decided to give my opinion.
- Joined
- Jul 4, 2008
- Messages
- 1,106
I would explain by words, only to realize how futile my explanations are.
I'll do some samples of what I mean, if that is necessary.
For light: (Not the bright one in the background; but rather the dim effects coming from it)
For mountains: Just add some large/small scale rocks to the tops should give a bit more detail to them. My sample is quite a horrible one at it.
I'll do some samples of what I mean, if that is necessary.
For light: (Not the bright one in the background; but rather the dim effects coming from it)
For mountains: Just add some large/small scale rocks to the tops should give a bit more detail to them. My sample is quite a horrible one at it.
Last edited:
- Status
