Goatman Spear Thrower

[Lukor]

Amazing!

 

[Kyrbi0]

Heck yeah. Horning in on my Troll's turf!

 

[Nortuega]

i love it

 

[Villagerino]

A great skin, animations and geosets. Also it's nice to have all this variety of skin types

Btw, are Gors so different from Goatmen? I don't know the lore, but I see that their faces have less fur and here he has a thing on his belt Oo

 

[Gluma]

A great skin, animations and geosets. Also it's nice to have all this variety of skin types

Btw, are Gors so different from Goatmen? I don't know the lore, but I see that their faces have less fur and here he has a thing on his belt Oo

yeah that's how they are on minis, also no eyebrows for some reason

 

[Nightmare2077]

I made a couple icons for these dudes to whoever's interested

 

[Em!]

Cool. Please fix the collision sphere 2 pivot points, its identical to the first.

 

[Gluma]

Cool. Please fix the collision sphere 2 pivot points, its identical to the first.

don't they work regardless of pivot points?

 

[Em!]

don't they work regardless of pivot points?

I am surprised by the question. They work similarly to two Origin Reference Points, meaning the second one is redundant and contributes nothing except for a minuscule file size increase. Collision spheres and accurate pivot points are pretty important imo, especially in competitive play. Misclicking is a thing, especially with slim/petite models. You´d want a sphere covering the upper portion of the model to ensure accurate clicking, and no salty player should be able to blame it on the model. Alternatively, I can approve the model if you want, as this is a minimal issue.

 

[Gluma]

I am surprised by the question. They work similarly to two Origin Reference Points, meaning the second one is redundant and contributes nothing except for a minuscule file size increase. Collision spheres and accurate pivot points are pretty important imo, especially in competitive play. Misclicking is a thing, especially with slim/petite models. You´d want a sphere covering the upper portion of the model to ensure accurate clicking, and no salty player should be able to blame it on the model. Alternatively, I can approve the model if you want, as this is a minimal issue.

Yeah I know what collision shapes are for

Idl how to explain this in proper terms, but these two shapes aren't in the same place. I think you're talking about the pivot point location, but it doesn't really determine where the sphere itself is. It's in its properties or something, refer to attached magos screenshot

I assume pivot point for collision spheres is a redundant parameter that would only change anything if you were to animate the collision shape, which you don't want to do anyway.

I double-checked ingame and the sphere works the same as it looks in the screenshot

 

[General Frank]

Yeah I know what collision shapes are for

Idl how to explain this in proper terms, but these two shapes aren't in the same place. I think you're talking about the pivot point location, but it doesn't really determine where the sphere itself is. It's in its properties or something, refer to attached magos screenshot

I assume pivot point for collision spheres is a redundant parameter that would only change anything if you were to animate the collision shape, which you don't want to do anyway.

I double-checked ingame and the sphere works the same as it looks on the screenshot

You are correct. Some programs cannot detect the 'internal' settings of collision shapes. Older RMS and MDLVis only saw the node's position and not its information inside. Magos seem to replicate the in-game state pretty well for collision shapes on units.

 

[Em!]

You are correct. Some programs cannot detect the 'internal' settings of collision shapes. Older RMS and MDLVis only saw the node's position and not its information inside. Magos seem to replicate the in-game state pretty well for collision shapes on units.

Well, there we have it then, if it works, then it works, I can approve. However, setting collision sphere the same way as attachment points works fine for me, no animation required. Annoying that the sanity checker is not reliable unless you set the pivots.

Spoiler: Points

 

[Em!]

A cool bundle, nice work. Approved.

 

[General Frank]

Well, there we have it then, if it works, then it works, I can approve. However, setting collision sphere the same way as attachment points works fine for me, no animation required. Annoying that the sanity checker is not reliable unless you set the pivots.

Spoiler: Points

View attachment 491160

Sanity checker and Hive 3D viewer have the same issue sadly.

 

[Lucas207]

Wow! This looks exceptional.