well, for somthing to emit light a chemical reaction must occur, reguardless of weather its infared,visible, or gamma light.
I stopped caring right here, but for courtesy's sake I read the rest of your post. Running an electrical current through a tungsten filament is not a chemical reaction, but it still generates light, even in the visible spectrum. Also, have you ever had a glow-in-the-dark toy? Where's
that chemical reaction?
well then ghost have to be large blobs of matter emiting radiation. so how does this happen? simply, it cant. people claim ghosts come from people, but from where in people, when we die we dont emit matter, and according to thermodynamics it cant "just appear" when we die. so ghosts can exist. there the creation of skilled artists and paranoid people with photoshop.
The idea isn't that something is created, but that something is separated from the body.
But what, whats this? you ghost believers have a promanet argument to your side too, you say ghost are the result of the "magical" discharge of the electricity in our brain when we die. well, you know where that proven to go? into the resto fo our body and then into the ground as next to no charge at all, because there isnt that much electricity there to begin with.
ghost's cant exist becasue of simple science, and i am willing to argue this further with more details
Your science sucks, frankly. Using science, it is physically impossible to disprove something, only to prove something that says something else.
Sure, that all sound trustworthy, and i'm a physics-believer too.
But science have been faulty before, or should i say inaccurate. Take the "earth is round" example. The scientists then had arguments of the same types as many of those of scientists today.
lol. Scientists have known the Earth was round since ancient Greece. It was the peasantry that nobody cared to educate that thought the earth was flat.
and true science has been wrong before, but only becasue we proved that science as wrong by using other science! but science isn't always wrong therfore unless you can prove that the science behind proving ghosts as a hoax is false, then the science stands as true
Technically science is never wrong, human interpretation of results are.
also, if ghosts did exist, then how do the form the shape of a person? i went to gettysburg and did a night walk and didn't see a ghost

and what the guide says is that the ghosts you may see are spheres. every person there, the tourguides and people who claimed to see the spiritual world said they saw shperes. ghosts in the shape of people adn wearing vlothes is jsut out of the question.
The little spheres of light happen quite frequently actually. I'm not sure what the explanation is, but they
do happen in pictures every now and then.
oh and dont get me wrong, i dont not want to believe in ghosts, i jsut believe in science's point of view becasue i have never experianced anything to make me tihnk otherwise.
Science doesn't have an opinion on ghosts so you know.
so were at a deadlock you saying? i cant prove there fake, you cant prove there real? then i guess they dont jsut exsist.. there we have it folks! ghosts dont exist
That is a logical fallacy. The basis of your claim that ghosts don't exist is that Hakeem cannot himself prove that ghosts
do exist. However, you said that you cannot prove that ghosts are fake, so anyone else's claims that ghosts exist are equally as valid as your claims that ghosts are fake.