Efrit

This bundle is marked as useful / simple. Simplicity is bliss, low effort and/or may contain minor bugs.
Credit if you use.
Don't edit without my permission.

Keywords:
Lion, fire, efrit, ifrit
Contents

Efrit (Model)

Reviews
12:44, 18th Apr 2010 DonDustin: very creative and great execution, but edit the internal name please. Oh and the armor could need some unwrap improvements aswell. BlinkBoy: Rejected until update. Please change the internal name.

Moderator

M

Moderator

12:44, 18th Apr 2010
DonDustin: very creative and great execution, but edit the internal name please. Oh and the armor could need some unwrap improvements aswell.

BlinkBoy: Rejected until update.

Please change the internal name.
 
Level 2
Joined
Apr 11, 2010
Messages
8
I'm looking at this, and with all concern, are you sure you should publish this?

The face kind of looks like a mask, and if it is, I apologize. But that is not that caught my eye, it seems to also be very blurry, and if you are going to upload this...

I would suggest editing it.

Peace

Typoboy
 
I see the moderation ask me to change the internal name.
But no I won't change the internal name.
It may give useful information on the base model I used.
And it is a flaw exclusive to THW since the internal name is never shown anywhere but on this site.
An exclusive flaw require an exclusive fix and it is a waste of time.

I have submitted the pack on wc3c.net and they didn't bitched about the internal name althought they have a higher quality standard.
On THW you have low quality standard but still bitch about pointless details like the internal name that is quite paradoxal.
 
Level 26
Joined
Jun 15, 2006
Messages
2,657
I see the moderation ask me to change the internal name.
But no I won't change the internal name.
It may give useful information on the base model I used.
And it is a flaw exclusive to THW since the internal name is never shown anywhere but on this site.
An exclusive flaw require an exclusive fix and it is a waste of time.

I have submitted the pack on wc3c.net and they didn't bitched about the internal name althought they have a higher quality standard.
On THW you have low quality standard but still bitch about pointless details like the internal name that is quite paradoxal.

uhm...ok will review it later again
 
Top