deepstrasz
Map Reviewer
- Joined
- Jun 4, 2009
- Messages
- 20,264
Defeated. It came back, greater than ever.
While I appreciate your feedback, and I agree that this is not on par with the old one in terms of "scaryness". I do have some points to give out.This one have 4 variations but I be focusing on the one in the thumbnail. Since Betsy has been AWOL lemme just take his review spot.
Before I start reviewing the Dark Sinister 2, I wanna point out a crucial point about Keeper Of The Grove model. I think you can replace KeeperVines.blp as seeing any KoTG skins while having grass effect still playing is a bit awkward to use. So I have to note that whenever I dip my hand to this 4 legged tree hugging goat boy here.
To start off, this skin is definitely an improvement over the Original Dark Sinister. I have certain comments about what is good and what is not but what I will say that you can't compare older works while upscaling over the original. That's a ground of unfair comparison and i'm sure 7 years old younger ~Nightmare doesn't appreciate that.
The DS2 face is a bit questionable because while I do believe this is better, the older skin is much more scarier, uglier intentionally make it even more convincing for a dark being. This one is just too much KoTG face pattern, I will say that the facework is impressive and I love that little "goat"ee. His hair is groovier than original, the original I thought it got a bottle of Head n Shoulder (tm).
About the armor, It's impressive but i feel recycled from K'Nawa. It's good but it's not something i have wide eyes open. The belt is probably the best part here and I love the bronze outerline. I also like TC capes, excellent shading for that one.
About those ... Magneta? Ruby pink? Let's just call it Crimson Pink. I think those color pop, especially the one on the hooves for the darker tone in this skin.
For a star rating: I give it a 4/5 - It's great but not trying to be the Dark Sinister. The skin changed way too much that is off the title.
For quality rating: I think Recommended if you like Demonic keeper of the grove and if your map like hot pink fire. I'm not sure of HQ because this skin didn't convince me as improvement but rather than a rework. Imma stick that rating just like og texture.
Then that just it make even worse for me because now people blame me for no more ~Nightmare work and start paint me like a bloody villain. I revived this section, somehow got you back and you got energy to keep making texture. Would that defeat my reasoning?As a reply to your rant in Discord. To prevent any of my resource (new ones) from being rated, I will no longer upload them through Hive. Instead, people can just pm me to get a copy.
A panel of people? Are they writing more than 2 paragraphs? It's not like they just casually like "yeah, this stuff can be DC". That's make you blindly pick this out of nowhere when older resource was not giving a consideration.@~Nightmare A panel of people have to agree before a DC can be awarded e.g. If 5 staff members vote, at least 3 have to agree to a DC.
Any mod or admin can nominate a resource for DC.
BTW sick texture dude!
I feel really insulted. Almost every year, I post in my profile that I will make a texture but never got the time due to my work. And since I changed careers and I no longer work graveyard shift, I had more time to spare. Don't incite that I came back because of someone, I came back because I had the time. This is really insulting, I swear.I revived this section, somehow got you back and you got energy to keep making texture. Would that defeat my reasoning?
I feel disappointed, forcing myself to work much harder to be much better. I even ask Footman just to simply please downgrade it which he didn't want to. So I get you are in the same mindset as I just explain right there.Also a question, what would you feel if someone says to you that some of your HQ rated works doesn't deserve such rating? Don't you think of what I feel after reading your comments? Think again.
I don’t know the answer to that question, but such rhetoric speaks volumes about lack of resilience to criticism. When criticism is not constructive and when it is presented in a manner in which has been, without a manner so to say, why would you absorb it or attach value to it to a point where it affects your motivation or whatever?Also a question, what would you feel if someone says to you that some of your HQ rated works doesn't deserve such rating? Don't you think of what I feel after reading your comments? Think again.
Good. Let’s hope they are qualified in field themselves to make such assessments on what qualifies for DC.The majority of a panel of people have to agree before a DC can be awarded e.g if 5 staff members vote, at least 3 have to agree to a DC. No staff member can give out a DC on their own without the consent of the staff.