• Listen to a special audio message from Bill Roper to the Hive Workshop community (Bill is a former Vice President of Blizzard Entertainment, Producer, Designer, Musician, Voice Actor) 🔗Click here to hear his message!
  • Read Evilhog's interview with Gregory Alper, the original composer of the music for WarCraft: Orcs & Humans 🔗Click here to read the full interview.

AMD Fusion E-350 or AMD E-450

Status
Not open for further replies.
Does anyone know if AMD has made two types of E-450 processors? I am looking for a good laptop and I have found two:

http://www.amazon.de/gp/product/B005UK3JBM/ref=noref?ie=UTF8&s=computers&psc=1

http://www.amazon.de/LH414EA-Notebo...54?s=computers&ie=UTF8&qid=1328369211&sr=1-54

Problem is one also shows "AMD HD 6320" versus "ATI Radeon HD 6310", and I can't tell if the first one is more powerful or the second.

Ideally, I don't know if "E-450" is a fusion-only processor, or if there was an older version which was just a normal processor without the added graphics enhancement :/

Just want a cheap laptop with good graphics, unless you guys know of something better.
 
Level 3
Joined
Jan 11, 2012
Messages
72
E-450 is the highest ranked ''battery saving'' Processor by amd, when comparing it to E-350 it's simple way better
Features
-50Mhz higher clock
-GPU has turbo mode up to 600mhz (100mhz faster) normal mode 508mhz ( 8mhz faster)
-Highest ram supported officially is 1333Mhz (266Mhz higher then e-350

If i was you i would likely buy a PC with E-450 instead of E-350 Mainly because of the official RAM support (overclocking a laptop is retarded) And turbo boost support. The GPU isn't much stronger but it's way stronger when Turbo Boost is enabled.
 
Level 15
Joined
Mar 31, 2009
Messages
1,397
Neither are worth it, the performance on both are so marginal that even Warcraft 3 would have trouble in some gametypes, and forget about Starcraft 2

I recommend this: http://www.amazon.de/X53SV-SO725V-Notebook-Intel-2330M-NVIDIA/dp/B005UD3ZAO/

Processor is about equal to the old Core 2 Q6600's, and the GPU is equal to the HD6570. Should run Starcraft 2 on Medium-High. Battlefield 3 on low is a possibility
 
Level 3
Joined
Jan 11, 2012
Messages
72
Neither are worth it, the performance on both are so marginal that even Warcraft 3 would have trouble in some gametypes, and forget about Starcraft 2

I recommend this: http://www.amazon.de/X53SV-SO725V-Notebook-Intel-2330M-NVIDIA/dp/B005UD3ZAO/

Processor is about equal to the old Core 2 Q6600's, and the GPU is equal to the HD6570. Should run Starcraft 2 on Medium-High. Battlefield 3 on low is a possibility
He never said he was aiming for SC2, if he is then Laptops aren't recommended, however if he is i would get a laptop with A8 processor and run hybrid setup with the integrated GPU, and that should take SC2 on atleast High.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top