Alliance System v1.01

[Moderator]

14:20, 15th Nov 2009
TriggerHappy187:

This seems like a huge overkill for something as simple as alliance.

Message me if you feel different (with reasons).

 

[eleljrk]

http://www.hiveworkshop.com/forums/spells-569/ally-war-system-1-3-a-108833/
RULES:

Originality
Submissions should be at least somewhat unique, except in cases where they greatly improve on an existing spell in terms of performance, cleanliness (of code), visuals, or otherwise.

Im sure this is good, it looks good. Add the Codes here and i will check it (Not that im so good at vJass, but wait.. I dont know vJass)

 

[MapperMalte]

Read the feature list and then think about how this greatly improves.

 

[eleljrk]

Read the feature list and then think about how this greatly improves.

I did before i posted, its still not "Orginal" ^^

EDIT:
Dont think i would like to have this system out from the Hive. My self im gonna use it when i got a map to use it on, but i like posting rules here and there..

 

[MapperMalte]

Things like initial alliance changes forbidden and all-time-struggle and forbidding partial alliances or the peace time and the explicit error messages are very original.

the system fullfills the circumstances that are listed as examples in the rule.

 

[Anachron]

Put that in HIDDEN Tags please.
Move that hidden content into the description.

Edit:

scope AllianceSystem initializer Init

And add the DialogSystem and Table to the requirements.

 

[Reaper2008]

Do you have to do that with scopes?

 

[James7]

I was wondering if anyone could help me implement this system into my map?

 

[Anachron]

I wonder how he thinks that we should care about this when he can't even hide the code to blew up the whole page and update it a little, such as making it a library.

 

[James7]

So this shouldn't be used?

I hope not. I was really hoping someone would be willing to help me implement this code into my map. Credits would be given and so forth.

 

[MapperMalte]

This should be used.
It's just a formal and already fixed thing they don't like.
They didn't notice I've updated this.
What are your problems with implementing this?

 

[MapperMalte]

Ok, updated the demo map.
(Scope => Library)

 

[Vercas]

It does what it's supposed to do and the code seems good enough in my opinion.
I should give it a 4/5 (the reason is your first comment), but I feel good today so let's make it 5/5!

 

[MapperMalte]

@triggerHappy:

Dude, if you say huge overkill for something that's simply, you have either not read the code or you don't understand what makes an alliance system good and comfortable. If you write that alliance systems are actually so simple, you're talking about noobish alliance systems that absolutely suck and on which I explained in my scripts Information Section why they suck. If you're interested in using high quality stuff, you should not use those 'simple alliance systems'.
Each of the features of the system is really useful and can't be achieved easily. I have worked on a map for several years that contained an alliance system. And I learned from that game what makes an alliance system good from the feedback of the players.
This is exactly the kind of system users wish.
And just being complicated doesn't make a system bad. Doing useless stuff makes it bad.
Bad is rejecting systems without having clearly thought if the system makes sense.

 

[Vercas]

@triggerHappy:

Dude, if you say huge overkill for something that's simply, you have either not read the code or you don't understand what makes an alliance system good and comfortable. If you write that alliance systems are actually so simple, you're talking about noobish alliance systems that absolutely suck and on which I explained in my scripts Information Section why they suck. If you're interested in using high quality stuff, you should not use those 'simple alliance systems'.
Each of the features of the system is really useful and can't be achieved easily. I have worked on a map for several years that contained an alliance system. And I learned from that game what makes an alliance system good from the feedback of the players.
This is exactly the kind of system users wish.
And just being complicated doesn't make a system bad. Doing useful stuff makes it bad.
Bad is rejecting systems without having clearly thought if the system makes sense.

That was hilarious!

 

[MapperMalte]

Ooops^^
Changed it. I had to laugh, too.