Nah, but I'd love it if you at least consulted with me or asked me before you did that. It feels very... Sneakish.
If you ask me, Misha's models are pretty much also worthy of a 5\5, but they lack that "Blizzard-like" sort of feel that Tauer's model has, which is why it earned a 5\5 in the first place. Tauer's model is also mechanically more complex(more animations, blood splats, dissipate, better portrait, things like that). The texture is also not as WC3-ish, though it looks great as well. With your leave, I'd like to return the Blackhand's rating to 5\5, although I would understand if you refuse.
EDIT: Also, I'd like to point out that different moderators judge things differently. That is a known fact, and it's not something that needs to be "improved" or "fixed". Kwaliti, for example, doesn't rate his models at all. I'm personally alright with every moderator judging things on his own accord(so long as a basic quality control line is maintained, and users' feelings are not hurt).
If you ask me, Misha's models are pretty much also worthy of a 5\5, but they lack that "Blizzard-like" sort of feel that Tauer's model has, which is why it earned a 5\5 in the first place. Tauer's model is also mechanically more complex(more animations, blood splats, dissipate, better portrait, things like that). The texture is also not as WC3-ish, though it looks great as well. With your leave, I'd like to return the Blackhand's rating to 5\5, although I would understand if you refuse.
EDIT: Also, I'd like to point out that different moderators judge things differently. That is a known fact, and it's not something that needs to be "improved" or "fixed". Kwaliti, for example, doesn't rate his models at all. I'm personally alright with every moderator judging things on his own accord(so long as a basic quality control line is maintained, and users' feelings are not hurt).