The rating system for Spells should be changed I think : ).
As it stands, it's extremely difficult for people to find high quality resources. This is because resources are rated by moderators based on a coolness factor, not on how well it was designed + coded.
A resource should get a 5/5 if it was coded perfectly, meaning excellent design, excellent API, excellent ease of use, no leaks, and so on : D. It should get 6/5 if it goes above and beyond, by perhaps including in-depth documentation like interactive tutorials, tons and tons of examples, and so on (like save/load with snippets does).
I just don't agree with how things are being currently rated. There are 5/5 resources that should be rated 2 or 3/5 and there are lots and lots of 3/5 resources that should be 5/5. A coolness factor approach is too damn subjective.
It would be nice if you brought this up with moderators.
edit
Does this mean that if File I/O was perfect that it should be 6/5? Hell no, because it doesn't have the in-depth examples and tutorials that Save/Load With Snippets has. At most, it'd be a 5/5, and in it's current state, a 2/5.
This means that you'll be able to approve anything and everything as well, so long as they work : ), even if they have memory leaks. 0/5 = doesn't even work, 1/5 = works, but crap, etc, lol. We can start grading resources by quality and make actually make the rating system useful to users : D.