• 🏆 Texturing Contest #33 is OPEN! Contestants must re-texture a SD unit model found in-game (Warcraft 3 Classic), recreating the unit into a peaceful NPC version. 🔗Click here to enter!
  • ✅ Time to vote for the top 3 models! The POLL for Hive's 6th HD Modeling Contest: Mechanical is now open! 📅 Poll close on July 16, 2024! 🔗 Cast your vote now!
  • ✅ The POLL for Hive's Texturing Contest #33 is OPEN! Vote for the TOP 3 SKINS! 🔗Click here to cast your vote!

Undead CatapultI

This bundle is marked as pending. It has not been reviewed by a staff member yet.
This is a model made by my friend Commedia. I forward it here for here.You can edit this model at will.You need to delete the / front ones(BLP).
Contents

Undead CatapultI (Model)

Undead CatapultI_Portrait (Model)

Attachments

  • 1.1.png
    1.1.png
    250.7 KB · Views: 73
  • 1.0.png
    1.0.png
    214.5 KB · Views: 68
Level 15
Joined
Jan 14, 2021
Messages
9
Sure, but this is does not belong in this section then as this is a port.
This model is originally from wow indeed, but it is simplified. It's materials are re-textured. It's animations are wc3's. And it has team color and portrait. In fact, it has already been a wc3-style model.

So I don't think we should put it in the port section.
 
Last edited:
Sure, but this is does not belong in this section then as this is a port.
1630239755117.png

We have to admit that this is indeed a model from World of Warcraft Classic, and it really is very similar to an ordinary model from the old 3 Warcraft, but in many ways more intelligible in appearance than in 3 Warcraft. I do not know who the author of the conversion of this model is, but even so I think the screenshots of the person really prove that he was allowed
 
This model is originally from wow indeed, but it is simplified. It's materials are re-textured. It's animations are wc3's. And it has team color and portrait. In fact, it has already been a wc3-style model.

So I don't think we should put it in the port section.
It is a port and we have a port section. It is the right place for it.
Otherwise I would have to restrict it because of the fishy source of it and the unclear author of the model.
 
Top