• 🏆 Texturing Contest #33 is OPEN! Contestants must re-texture a SD unit model found in-game (Warcraft 3 Classic), recreating the unit into a peaceful NPC version. 🔗Click here to enter!
  • It's time for the first HD Modeling Contest of 2024. Join the theme discussion for Hive's HD Modeling Contest #6! Click here to post your idea!

U.S. withdrawal from Iraq

Status
Not open for further replies.
Level 14
Joined
Nov 4, 2006
Messages
576
My opinion is that, After the mission failed [To find those WMD's the Bush Administration claimed Saddam has], And they changed the mission into turning Iraq to a Democratic nation,
They caused Insurgency and Terrorism to grow in the country, Which would never of happened if Saddam would still be in Power.
So what we got out from this war is:

• No WMD's found.
• Iraq put to Civil War, And Insurgency and Terrorism grows, And still Remains.
• Billions of money wasted, Which could of been used for better things.
• And According to ORB Survey there are 1,220,580 Casualties. That is from 2003-2008. Now what if we count in the Embargo before the Invasion where according to UNICEF atleast 170.000 Children died due to starvation.

*Edit*
You should all Youtube when Donald Rumsfeld just shrugs at the question and acts like ''dunno lol'' when they asked him where 2.3 trillion dollars just ''dissappeared'' in Iraq.
 
Level 12
Joined
Mar 18, 2008
Messages
865
True, Saddam was perfectly controlling the country. U.S.A. ruined everything.

The troops will probably be thrown in Afghanistan sooner or later.

Or maybe on our Country's southern border if war breaks out...
 
Level 14
Joined
Nov 4, 2006
Messages
576
True, Saddam was perfectly controlling the country. U.S.A. ruined everything.

The troops will probably be thrown in Afghanistan sooner or later.

Or maybe on our Country's southern border if war breaks out...

He wasn't controlling it Perfectly, Of what we're taught and have been seen he's been a Monster. Good thing he's Gone though. But Still doesn't Justify the war.

Oh and fixed the casualty thingy I said before, Didn't notice that they said ''The word "casualties" in its most general sense includes the injured as well as the dead.''
 
Level 35
Joined
Dec 10, 2007
Messages
4,037
Actually, that's true. Once there's only a dozen of American "advisors" left, civil war will erupt and the Americans will have another Afghanistan on their asses. NATO weapons, NATO training and fanatical leadership. I mean, who knows how long will the loyalty of those Iraqis last?
 
Level 4
Joined
Apr 27, 2009
Messages
94
My opinion is that, After the mission failed [To find those WMD's the Bush Administration claimed Saddam has], And they changed the mission into turning Iraq to a Democratic nation,
They caused Insurgency and Terrorism to grow in the country, Which would never of happened if Saddam would still be in Power.
So what we got out from this war is:

• No WMD's found.
• Iraq put to Civil War, And Insurgency and Terrorism grows, And still Remains.
• Billions of money wasted, Which could of been used for better things.
• And According to ORB Survey there are 1,220,580 Casualties. That is from 2003-2008. Now what if we count in the Embargo before the Invasion where according to UNICEF atleast 170.000 Children died due to starvation.

*Edit*
You should all Youtube when Donald Rumsfeld just shrugs at the question and acts like ''dunno lol'' when they asked him where 2.3 trillion dollars just ''dissappeared'' in Iraq.

And just how much more do you think they've earned?
Secondly,they never were looking for wmd's, although they might want people like you to think so.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top