Approved
Moderator
M
Moderator
12th Dec 2015
IcemanBo: Too long as NeedsFix. Rejected.
01:50, 8th Sep 2012
Magtheridon96:
Okay, so far so good.
Just one more update before this is approved.
Instead of (Integer A) and (Integer B), use your own integer variables. (You can use the same one)
Long story short, if a trigger using an Integer A or B loop is triggered inside your loop's code, the spell will most-likely fail.
Having a global integer per spell is a better solution.
By the way, you have to understand that there are countless other spells on this site that have been rejected for being too simple, so the highest rating I can give is a 2/5. :/
Luckily, I'm giving users another option: No rating at all to avoid denigrating a user's resource.
Also, I added hidden tags for you just now and removed the third trigger since it wasn't actually part of the spell.
IcemanBo: Too long as NeedsFix. Rejected.
01:50, 8th Sep 2012
Magtheridon96:
Okay, so far so good.
Just one more update before this is approved.
Instead of (Integer A) and (Integer B), use your own integer variables. (You can use the same one)
Long story short, if a trigger using an Integer A or B loop is triggered inside your loop's code, the spell will most-likely fail.
Having a global integer per spell is a better solution.
By the way, you have to understand that there are countless other spells on this site that have been rejected for being too simple, so the highest rating I can give is a 2/5. :/
Luckily, I'm giving users another option: No rating at all to avoid denigrating a user's resource.
Also, I added hidden tags for you just now and removed the third trigger since it wasn't actually part of the spell.
