Orpgtv

[Moderator]

ap0: Rejected

MasterHaosis: Yes very small tester, but good and enough to gett approved
[ ] Map scanned of viruses
[ ] Map doesnot crash WC3 as far I can see
No- Map is yours/seems no edited from other author- but you give fair credit
[APPROVED]

 

[Lopaki]

Lol?

 

[Etzer]

I don't get the review?

 

[-Kobas-]

Map number 22.

Hello user As map review member I am helping map moderators to clean THW! I won't post any kind of review just final mark that will be Rejection in this case! I checked your map and I find it unacceptable... Here are the reasons: No longer compatible (Means they are not playable with patch 1.24). Invalid author name. Messy, poor or no description (Except for map uploaded between 2004-2006). Type abuse (Use excessive tag such as melee,maze, mini-games and so on). Too many bugs that affect the gameplay. Lots of memory leaks. Edited map (With/without permission). Campaign without all the maps included (If there is a missing chapter or map that is in beta stage, it deserves rejection). Bad Gameplay. #green = good #gray = neutral #red = bad If you want to know more PM me and I will explain my vote! Thanks -Kobas-