• Check out the results of the Techtree Contest #19!
  • Listen to a special audio message from Bill Roper to the Hive Workshop community (Bill is a former Vice President of Blizzard Entertainment, Producer, Designer, Musician, Voice Actor) 🔗Click here to hear his message!
  • Read Evilhog's interview with Gregory Alper, the original composer of the music for WarCraft: Orcs & Humans 🔗Click here to read the full interview.
  • Create a void inspired texture for Warcraft 3 and enter Hive's 34th Texturing Contest: Void! Click here to enter!
  • The Hive's 22nd Icon Contest: Creep Abilities is now concluded, time to vote for your favourite set of icons! Click here to vote!

Lumberjack's Hut (Doodads)

This bundle is marked as useful / simple. Simplicity is bliss, low effort and/or may contain minor bugs.
Simply cut out of and combination of existing models to provide other variation

This is more decoration than actually unit/building
Contents

log_small_v1 (Model)

log_small_v2 (Model)

log_small_with_axe (Model)

lumberjack_ hat (Model)

lumberjack_goods (Model)

lumberjack_tent (Model)

lumberjack_tent_brown (Model)

skinning_stand (Model)

stump_with_axe (Model)

Reviews
Ardenaso
I fully agree that this is more of a decoration than an actual building because it doesn't have proper birth animations, and the death animation needs consistent visibility; furthermore it also needs a foundation to function correctly as a building I...
I fully agree that this is more of a decoration than an actual building because it doesn't have proper birth animations, and the death animation needs consistent visibility; furthermore it also needs a foundation to function correctly as a building

I APPROVE this nonetheless but only as a doodad, but regardless of the errors it can still be USEFUL/SIMPLE
 
I fully agree that this is more of a decoration than an actual building because it doesn't have proper birth animations, and the death animation needs consistent visibility; furthermore it also needs a foundation to function correctly as a building

I APPROVE this nonetheless but only as a doodad, but regardless of the errors it can still be USEFUL/SIMPLE
If possible, I would kindly ask you to consider changing the status of this package to the next set of doodads and, if applicable, to evaluate whether this package could be marked as 'recommended'. :D
 
Back
Top