well kudos if this is a melee map... but i have a feeling it's not :\ but back then they may not of had bulldozers and such but towns were not 100% chaoticly placed. look at ancient towns such as ancient Rome and Jeruselum, the building arent scattered everywhere.
This is one of the "cleaner" medieval streets. A street is clearly visible, just like in the screens the streets are visible, but really, the buildings are pretty scatered here too.
By the way, Ancient Rome or Jerusalem isn't your "average" city... Ancient Rome wasn't a "village" either like this one, in fact it's a city that can be called very exceptional, not really "the standard". But don't worry, even rome contained slums and city borders who were pretty chaotic.
Rome has also been laid in ruins during the middle ages. It was only during the renaissance that (partly thanks to Napoleon) city organisation and those typical 17th century wide organised streets were introduced in cities. The Rome you see today is partly the rome from the ancient era and from the renaissance, but there's very, very little left of the Medieval Rome.
You can't really call this organised. And this example probably isn't truly medieval either, it's a village probably constructed "recently", at a time where city organisation IS taken seriously.
even in mideval Europe towns wernt built without orginization.
Oh, there was some organisation, in the form of streets. And streets are visible there too. But it didn't go much further than that. There was no higher authority that really planned cities like they started doing in the late 17th century. Also note that the city centres (not the city borders) usually tended to be more organised, but the screenshots clearly show a small village, a town, but not a "city".
and last but not least, they wouldn't build little tonws if the terrains height was as varied as in the picture.
uh...
If you were talking about cities, I'd agree, more or less, but about ANY village that's build in a country that isn't totally flat has such height variance. Simply because they don't have any alternatives. I mean, Italy is filled with villages with quite some height variety, simply because there are no flat lands there... Sure, there's Rome, but not every town or city can be Rome.
Here an image of a typical italian town (and a town of that size would easily be considered a city in the medieval era, but it clearly is a pretty modern town - can you believe how a medieval town would be organised if people STILL do this today?)
Also let me end with the following image
It clearly shows towns pop up at the most bizarre places. After all, out of all locations, why would they build a town there, at a place where the only entrance roads are flooded every 12 hours, on a bloody hill?
The scaling is a bit off... barrels that are like 8 feet tall?
Well that's been said already...