CoD ghosts will be different

[Deleted member 219079]

Guys have you seen it? It looks so different :O I'm gonna buy 3 copies of it for each platform. What do you think? How many copies are you going to buy?

 

[chobibo]

Wow, looks like you have a lot of cash to spare.

 

[Deleted member 219079]

Wow, looks like you have a lot of cash to spare.

Not usually, but I always save for CoD. I actually am going to buy 3 CE:s for each platform, I just got a credit card so I have some money to spend. Also, the armored edition looks awesome, gonna grab that one as well

I can't believe how I always fall in love in how different CoD looks every year. Activision really cares for their customers, they even put DLC on stores, so we can get more maps

 

[StoPCampinGn00b]

Looks different. But...

I GOT BF4 BETA!

Read how activision cares for us and there is alot of effort. I'm thinking that you smoking something...

 

[chobibo]

Man, you sound like a fanboy now. Was it you who posted the fanboy thread? Anyways, as long as you enjoy the game, go for it. We are rooting for you. *pats jondread's back*

 

[Deleted member 219079]

Looks different. But...

...it isn't. Seriously who the fuck puts their money on CoD. It attracts way too much children to enjoy the community, you gotta buy new game that costs 60€ every year. And they even make you pay for additional maps. I've watched their videos, they seem to tell you every fucking difference to the past CoDs. "hey guys, we made new menu, wanna give us 60 euros now?" well fuck you Activision. Also it's an FPS that aims to be as realistic as possible. I don't like realistic games, Sims 3 for example. But Sims 3's goal isn't to kill as many people as possible. It saddens me when my friends talk about CoD. How can they enjoy that bullshit? How can anyone enjoy it? TF2 is enough of an FPS for me. Also the creativity in CoD, there's none. In the gameplay, nor in the development. Do you play CoD? Tell me where's the creativity. Now you're gonna tell me games don't have to be creative, they have to be entertaining. I'm sorry, since when has shooting someone and getting score out of it been entertaining?

And don't get me started on the parents who let their children to play that horrific game. They should shame themselves, they're not grown enough to have children. And realize it's not good for their 13-year old to play that game. I hear 7-graders swearing and respecting those who are aggressive. It's horrible. Now you're gonna tell me I shouldn't care about 7-graders and what others play and like? It affects my friends, makes teachers stressed and makes the discussions I hear from them idiotic. Activision should stop the CoD brand, let InfinityWard make the Spyro the Dragon sequel ( jk ) and make f2p game with the money they've gotten.

Here's my true opinion on CoD. Hope you like it ^^ And no I'm not gonna spend a penny on that game.

 

[chobibo]

I'm confused, you said you wanted to buy all three ports, now you're saying you hate them. Oh man...

 

[Deleted member 219079]

I'm confused, you said you wanted to buy all three ports, now you're saying you hate them. Oh man...

I fooled you. I were trying to catch CoD fans.
My plan was:
1. Get them to read my thread
2. Make them post "cool, me too "
3. By posting here, get subscribed
4. Then watch my post here, read my hate
5. Rage on me / explain why's CoD entertaining, cuz I don't get it

Edit: Yes, I'm bored

Edit2: This is my 200th post, I've posted a lot of BS this year

 

[chobibo]

Cool! me too.

 

[Deleted member 219079]

I see what you did there.

 

[StoPCampinGn00b]

Wtf. I'd buy ghosts over all the other shooters except BF4 and Planetside on nextgen. Meh.

 

[saphiree]

Most people even have to get a new rig. I heard the system requirements was pretty high, but imo it still looks at bad graphics wise as all the other games.

 

[StoPCampinGn00b]

Wrong things:

Also it's an FPS that aims to be as realistic as possible. (I can confidently tell you that the developers are aiming the game to be fun for a wide variety of people, not realistic. Ever heard of ARMA 3? It doesn't look very entertaining, but it seems like it tries to simulate war)

Activision should stop the CoD brand (Lose all that money?)

Seriously who the fuck puts their money on CoD (Oh, just the the second largest video game consumer base right now)

And realize it's not good for their 13-year old to play that game. (To be honest, the ones who are aggresive are the ones who have a bad home-life. Most of the "real call of duty" players I remember when I was in middle school had above average academics, but maybe that's because we have a somewhat ghetto community that can't afford video games if you really think violent video games make people violent and dumb)

They should shame themselves, they're not grown enough to have children. (A lot of times, this is the thing that makes the kid happy. It was like that for me when my GF broke up with me in 8th grade, on the weekends I just wanted to chill home at times, I'm that kind of person who would like to try things. No, I can believe that I was not addicted to CoD, I can agree I am addicted to Warcraft.)

I'm not a CoD fan anymore, and I have to go. Maybe add more later.
Sincerely, SCN

 

[Deleted member 219079]

They're not aiming it to be fun, the only fun thing I can find from the gameplay is that you can shoot more people in a match than others. And it's sick.

I wasn't talking about money, I was talking about how they've made a game that affects my school.

I wasn't saying that seriously, I know it's a popular game. Just who is idiotic enough to...

I didn't understand that. Academics may be good, but I wasn't talking about them??

Now you're saying it makes their children happy? Against my comment "They should shame themselves, they're not grown enough to have children." It doesn't make any sense?

 

[StoPCampinGn00b]

They're not aiming it to be fun, the only fun thing I can find from the gameplay is that you can shoot more people in a match than others. And it's sick. (You mean: you find it sick? There are way to many more violent games than call of duty. There isn't even any blood in multiplayer, much less gore. Yes, they are aiming for it to be fun. They always say they aim for a "Great Call of Duty experience." If you only see that in the gameplay, and if that were true, why would they add arcade style game modes, a bunch of customization of YOUR character, and cool gadgets? Just for extras no one will care about?)

I wasn't talking about money, I was talking about how they've made a game that affects my school. (It affects your school, but you perceive it as a bad thing. I perceive it as neutral)

I wasn't saying that seriously, I know it's a popular game. Just who is idiotic enough to... (Everyone who likes to play that game is idiotic? That would be horrible, if it were true.)

I didn't understand that. Academics may be good, but I wasn't talking about them?? (I was reffering to how most of the gamers I know - that also love competitive Call of Duty - have great academics, I know that's a stereo-type, but it is true in my case.)

Now you're saying it makes their children happy? Against my comment "They should shame themselves, they're not grown enough to have children." It doesn't make any sense? (You're on the side "Think about the children!" The parents are happy when the children are happy, I believe in that. A lot of the media says: "Video games kill people." <- Not true. "Video games give a bad influence to kids." <- Debatable. It was the parents choice, and the kid most likely wanted it to have fun, so his/her parent(s) bought it for them.)

 

[Deleted member 219079]

"You mean: you find it sick?" That was my comment, so it's my opinion. Yes, I mean I find it sick.
"There are way to many more violent games than call of duty." And I don't play them, but CoD attracts way too much little people to play it.
"There isn't even any blood in multiplayer, much less gore." Okay.
"Yes, they are aiming for it to be fun." They're aiming to make shooting people to be fun? Sound even more sick than what you described before
"They always say they aim for a "Great Call of Duty experience."" Okay.
"If you only see that in the gameplay, and if that were true, why would they add arcade style game modes, a bunch of customization of YOUR character, and cool gadgets?" I didn't understand that.
"Just for extras no one will care about?" That either.
"It affects your school, but you perceive it as a bad thing. I perceive it as neutral" Okay.
"Everyone who likes to play that game is idiotic? That would be horrible, if it were true." Yes, they are. Maybe not grown up though, as it is PEGI 18.
"I was reffering to how most of the gamers I know - that also love competitive Call of Duty - have great academics, I know that's a stereo-type, but it is true in my case." Okay.
"You're on the side "Think about the children!"" Okay.
"The parents are happy when the children are happy, I believe in that." Okay.
"A lot of the media says: "Video games kill people." <- Not true. "Video games give a bad influence to kids." <- Debatable. It was the parents choice, and the kid most likely wanted it to have fun, so his/her parent(s) bought it for them.)" *sigh* okay...

Media says that video games kill people? I weren't going that far, I was talking about bad behavior.

So you think there isn't connection between real life behavior and video games? I can't deny that. But I just googled this, I want to see how you respond to these three things:

First, video game play is active whereas watching TV is passive. People learn better when they are actively involved. Suppose you wanted to learn how to fly an airplane. What would be the best method to use: read a book, watch a TV program, or use a video game flight simulator?

Second, players of violent video games are more likely to identify with a violent character. If the game is a first person shooter, players have the same visual perspective as the killer. If the game is third person, the player controls the actions of the violent character from a more distant visual perspective. In a violent TV program, viewers might or might not identify with a violent character. People are more likely to behave aggressively themselves when they identify with a violent character (e.g., Konijn et al., 2007)

Third, violent games directly reward violent behavior, such as by awarding points or by allowing players to advance to the next game level. In some games, players are rewarded through verbal praise, such as hearing the words "Nice shot!" after killing an enemy. It is well known that rewarding behavior increases its frequency. (Would you go to work tomorrow if your boss said you would no longer be paid?) In TV programs, reward is not directly tied to the viewer's behavior.

 

[chobibo]

@jondrean gotta love em fanboys and fangirls.

 

[StoPCampinGn00b]

I thought jondrean was the fanboy (Just kidding, you're cool), since the use of all that "evidence." To be honest, I simply didn't have enough time to post all I wanted, but you made your point. My point is that Call of Duty isn't as bad as you say. I feel like it is hated on to much, which makes me, well, un-happy, (but not angry of course).

I can be confident enough to say I haven't played Call of Duty in almost a whole year, so I don't qualify my self a fanboy. I stopped defending CoD (Make this an exception ) because I thought it was a "great game" since. I don't defend it because I like it (I don't like the new one and I see slim chances of me getting into Call of Duty Ghosts), but I defend it because it does NOT deserve all the negative remarks just for being popular, or some would say, successful.

My objective: To stop the hate and to make others understand why people like Call of Duty.


About video game influence:

Doom and Mortal Kombat came out 20 years ago. Students that played these first violent video games in high school are now about to hit middle age. My brother and I first played them in grade school and we’re both now professionals with graduate degrees. In these last 20 years society has not collapsed, youth delinquency has not skyrocketed, and the biggest challenges we have faced have had nothing to do with popular media.
Video games do provoke a range of emotional response – frustration, anxiety, elation, even sadness. But the same can be said of every other form of media out there – novels, movies, music, comic books, the list goes on. And just like movies and novels, the best video games are the ones that elicit the deepest response.
In the end of the day, a video game will not kill a person any more than a movie or a song or a book will. Each of these could tip an unstable psyche over the edge but it will be the gun in that person’s hand that will allow them to slaughter indiscriminately.

I have been a gamer for 25 years, starting in my youth. I’ve been exposed to excessively violent games since the age of 13. When Columbine occurred, I was in high school. Unfortunately, my friends and I were targeted as “the type” simply because we played the same kinds of games. According to the media, I should be a prime candidate for studies like these. However, I have no desire to own or use a firearm. I have a strong background in pacifist ideology. I also enjoy the fantasy of gun violence in games, like the majority of my peers. On occasion, particularly in competitive shooters, emotions can run high. It taps into a part of the brain that brings out the same kind of unsportsmanlike conduct that you might see in professional sports. But when we’re done, it’s back to reality. We cool off. It’s just a game. We see similar effects on ourselves playing relatively benign competitive games like Mario Party (essentially a board game), or even Tetris, which involve no guns or violence to speak of. Emotional maturity makes a big difference. If we are to study violent behavior with video games, they should closely measure one’s physical and mental well-being overall, and monitor other stressful or emotionally challenging activities in their lives. Violent games alone don’t create mass murderers, or there would be millions of killers on the street right now. If the perpetrators of Columbine didn’t have Doom, they would have made their plans using other tools. I would not be surprised if studies show that playing violent games are detrimental to those who have certain mental conditions…and that younger players are at greater risk because they are still maturing. Playing violent games could expose symptoms of more serious problems, but the games are not in themselves the disease.

Those are voiced out opinions.

While some studies suggests physiological arousal, increased anti-social behaviour and aggression-related feelings and thoughts, many experts argue there is generally a lack of quality studies which can be relied upon and that the video game industry has become an easy target for the media to blame for many modern day problems. 12 13 14
In a study conducted by the US government, the conclusion states that violence in video games is not linked with aggressive tendencies and that other factors are at play. 15 In fact, there are many benefits one can get out of playing games including its capability to help players deal with stress and anger. Surprisingly, in spite of the studies showing contrary results, some researchers are still continuing to argue that gaming is dangerous.

I can believe most of this.

 

[chobibo]

@jondrean Looks like one-to-five came true.

Yeah, CoD isn't a bad game, I played the first one and its expansion. I enjoyed every minute of it. A lot of people play it. Humans love violence, even virtual violence. Kill, kill, kill; gotta love them games, jondrean just couldn't accept that, he's refusing his humanity. I mean who doesn't want to play a game where you kill shit? And it's realistic too, hell yeah! blood and gore everywhere. It's the same as human history, full of slaughter and show of power.

I think what jondrean was saying is that it sucks when you buy a new game and after playing it, you find out it's the same gameplay with new graphics, I would be mad too.

Oh, the fanboy comment was about the his other thread, it was about fanboy debates on youtube, it wasn't directed at you (though I did anticipate your reaction), it was directed at him, he was arguing like a fanboy.

 

[Deleted member 219079]

Hey that text wall is longer than mine! Damn :O
@box1:
"Doom and Mortal Kombat came out 20 years ago. Students that played these first violent video games in high school are now about to hit middle age. My brother and I first played them in grade school and we’re both now professionals with graduate degrees." I wasn't talking about academics, social behavior that is.
"In these last 20 years society has not collapsed, youth delinquency has not skyrocketed, and the biggest challenges we have faced have had nothing to do with popular media."

First, people may think: "I play violent video games and I've never killed anyone." This fallacious reasoning is a good example of how the "availability heuristic" coupled with the "base rate problem" (Kahneman & Tversky, 1973) distort reasoning. People have great difficulty judging influences on events when the base rate probability of the event is very low. It is not surprising that people who play violent video games have not killed anyone because very few people kill anyone. For example, fewer than 6 people per 100,000 are murdered each year in the United States (U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation, 2010). It is very difficult to predict rare events, such as murder, using exposure to violent video games or any other factor. However, murder is the most salient violent event to most people; so when they don't have "available" in memory cases of people playing violent games and then murdering, they ignore the base rate of murder and conclude that violent games have no effect on aggression.

Rest of the box: My first box denies that. Did you even read it?
@box2: isn't that nearly the same you said in box 1? - "In these last 20 years society has not collapsed, youth delinquency has not skyrocketed, and the biggest challenges we have faced have had nothing to do with popular media." - Like, "I haven't kill anyone, so video games don't affect me"
@box3: wait, where is your denial for my boxes? Anyway, that says a study made by US government shows that video games aren't linked with aggression/behavior irl? It's nice to see you've found that kind of study I wonder why you can believe that. How do you deny my boxes (not this post) by saying "there is a study that shows you're wrong, you f*cktard hater!!" "In fact, there are many benefits one can get out of playing games including its capability to help players deal with stress and anger." How can you get relaxed by shooting someone in first person view? In first person view it makes you think you're the shooter. I can understand Diablo 3 for example, where you don't shoot people (monsters) and you're not on first person view.

StoPCampinGn00b, what is your opinion on this video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8NMnnMRWJ-0 Do you think this is entertaining?

@chobibo Of course gore and blood is nice, that's the reason I enjoyed Diablo 3 like no other game ^^ It was awesome. But when it gets to first person view and to the real world, it's not funny.

I fooled you. I were trying to catch CoD fans.
My plan was:
1. Get them to read my thread
2. Make them post "cool, me too "
3. By posting here, get subscribed
4. Then watch my post here, read my hate
5. Rage on me / explain why's CoD entertaining, cuz I don't get it

StoPCampinGn00b hasn't say a thing about the entertainment he gets from CoD (has quoted though). I would've liked him to catch onto this:

They're not aiming it to be fun, the only fun thing I can find from the gameplay is that you can shoot more people in a match than others. And it's sick.

My CoD - playing friend (one of them) said that it's this thing. The competition, the challenges, leader board etc. But fps isn't even a good genre for competition, compared to games like StarCraft II, that is built around eSports and player vs player gameplay with great observing.

Edit:

My objective: To stop the hate and to make others understand why people like Call of Duty.

Please don't try to modify others' preferences on life. They are decisions, and personal decisions are important. I hope you know I'm not discussing about you should stop playing realistic FPS, I'm discussing about the entertainment in CoD.

 

[The_wand_mirror]

Totally OP pimp-ass beast dog!

 

[chobibo]

Modern warfare? looks like modern mass murder to me...

 

[StoPCampinGn00b]

That was a controversial campaign mission designated by the "terrorist" who would rise in the next Infinity Ward Call of Duty in the future. You control a US agent, to learn the enemy plans. That game was created 5 years ago and won actually won FPS of choice. I guess it was the peak of CoD, and people say the new ones have "to much stuff" added to it.

I live Hishe
(I'm on mobile right now, so I won't make a long reply)

Edit: I'm actually more relaxed playing Call of Duty than Warcraft. Welp, I guess that's just me.

 

[chobibo]

So you're planning to reply with another text wall? lol this thread is great!

 

[Deleted member 219079]

That was a controversial campaign mission designated by the "terrorist" who would rise in the next Infinity Ward Call of Duty in the future. You control a US agent, to learn the enemy plans.

I live Hishe

So do you think it is entertaining?

Your post puzzles me. You ain't gonna say I made that wall of text for nothing?

Fanboyism is an act where you protect ego of your group (CoD player base/community in this case) to the point where it counter attacks any criticisms and denies them, even if they're true... "Ignore all criticisms and believe they are false."

Do you feel like "this is the game" when playing CoD? Does a game published by InfinityWard/Treyarch attract you more than game published by other companies?

Did you know your memory can wipe out criticisms about brand you strongly prefer / you're fanboy to, even if it'd be true?

In other words, I knew from beginning a person that is attracted to a brand can't accept what I'm saying. I'm such a douche... (This is one reason why you should be the third guy at my fanboy scenario thread, it wouldn't be fully up to you what you'll answer)

However, I can google more stuff to respond to your possibly great sources if you want. Let's make gigantic text walls together ^^

 

[chobibo]

You know jondrean, I'm also interested to read SCN's reply. Will it be defensive? or will it ignore the said topic? This is gonna be good. *grabs popcorn*

 

[Deleted member 219079]

You know jondrean, I'm also interested to read SCN's reply. Will it be defensive? or will it ignore the said topic? This is gonna be good. *grabs popcorn*

It will at least be huge, I've said so many arguments at him :/

 

[StoPCampinGn00b]

I just want you to stop hating (trolling on "fanboys" if you will) on Call of Duty. Once again, I'm limited to a short reply.


EDIT: http://kotaku.com/5858098/why-its-stupid-to-hate-call-of-duty Have fun. There is a fanboy war below that I would not participate in.

It's stupid to "hate" any video game, really. Why? It's a freaking video game.
I think anyone over 30—or even those with real responsibility regardless of age— realizes priorities change, and things like this are such a fucking non-issue in life. I'm not saying most are not mature enough to understand this....well, yeah. I am saying that.
Get a grip, and just enjoy what you enjoy, and let others enjoy what they enjoy. Couldn't be simpler. There are so many important things to complain about. Video games are not one of them.
As a side note, I'll be picking up MW3 next week. I have to buy an import version, since I'm in Japan (and paying a bit more, I might add.) But I'm excited to see what Infinity Ward has done now. My biggest hope is they fixed the MP connection issues that plagued the PS3 version of Black-Ops. Even still, I'd be happy to just play the Campaign. CoD games are such great mindless diversions.

I don't hate any at the moment, but I keep my mouth shut when I do.

So do you think it is entertaining?

Your post puzzles me. You ain't gonna say I made that wall of text for nothing?

Fanboyism is an act where you protect ego of your group (CoD player base/community in this case) to the point where it counter attacks any criticisms and denies them, even if they're true... "Ignore all criticisms and believe they are false."

Do you feel like "this is the game" when playing CoD? Does a game published by InfinityWard/Treyarch attract you more than game published by other companies?

Did you know your memory can wipe out criticisms about brand you strongly prefer / you're fanboy to, even if it'd be true?

In other words, I knew from beginning a person that is attracted to a brand can't accept what I'm saying. I'm such a douche... (This is one reason why you should be the third guy at my fanboy scenario thread, it wouldn't be fully up to you what you'll answer)

However, I can google more stuff to respond to your possibly great sources if you want. Let's make gigantic text walls together ^^

What? All I was saying is what happened in that scene. I also simply stated that I have no passion for Call of Duty anymore, but I think it is still a quality game. My cousin is an RPG player and free world player, he used to enjoy Call of Duty as a pro. Had fun with a clan for over 2 years on the PC. He dislikes RTS games, and would not join any WC3 game online that was not hero based. That doesn't upset me (I get disappointed of course), because he did not express the hate that would make the fans less happy in enjoying their games.

My CoD - playing friend (one of them) said that it's this thing. The competition, the challenges, leader board etc. But fps isn't even a good genre for competition, compared to games like StarCraft II, that is built around eSports and player vs player gameplay with great observing.

Yes jondrean, I agree with your friend. I have my self laughing at my self trying to complete odd challenges, having a mic out with the enemy laughing at the kill cam, Call of Duty had the biggest factor in competition because it is basically you and the team work like a squad. You can't just run up straight to the middle contested flag (A control point) by your self with a machine gun. People focus on character stats as much as people study counter units in Warcraft. That is why I love Call of Duty. just a good ol' team game that requires you to think. I actually think it's cool that you think this game is realistic, other communities rage at how CoD has lower quality graphics, and how the game plays to arcade style. Luckily, you aren't an FPS gamer (Or so I think) so you wouldn't compare this to other games.

@chobibo Of course gore and blood is nice, that's the reason I enjoyed Diablo 3 like no other game ^^ It was awesome. But when it gets to first person view and to the real world, it's not funny.

Well, I don't play games for that. I don't really dig that stuff, and if you do, GTA 5 is waiting for you. Jondrean, you didn't believe me how CoD multiplayer doesn't have gore? Yes, the Tryarch versions have blood, but not gore.

Reason why I don't play CoD anymore:
1. The alternate developer (Treyarch stepped in when Call of Duty 5 came out) has a different style, it does not feel similar to the matches I loved in MW2 and 3.
2. I got really tired of people hating since it ruined the communities.
3. Battlefield seemed to fit more to my style, and when I did "switch". I still think the franchise should be bombarded with hate messages.


Well, I'm tired.


-unfinished, busy-

 

[chobibo]

I don't think jondrean was hating the game, he was expecting an argument... too bad this is disappointing... *packs up*

 

[Deleted member 219079]

Please don't try to modify others' preferences on life. They are decisions, and personal decisions are important. I hope you know I'm not discussing about you should stop playing realistic FPS, I'm discussing about the entertainment in CoD.

It's your decision to play CoD, I can do nothing about it. I were still discussing about the entertainment in CoD, not hate.

"What? All I was saying is what happened in that scene." That was the thing that puzzled me ^^

So you link me to a site where they're discussing about hate on CoD? And say I'd have fun there. No thank you.

"Yes jondrean, I agree with your friend. I have my self laughing at my self trying to complete odd challenges, having a mic out with the enemy laughing at the kill cam, Call of Duty had the biggest factor in competition because it is basically you and the team work like a squad. You can't just run up straight to the middle contested flag (A control point) by your self with a machine gun. People focus on character stats as much as people study counter units in Warcraft. That is why I love Call of Duty. just a good ol' team game that requires you to think. I actually think it's cool that you think this game is realistic, other communities rage at how CoD has lower quality graphics, and how the game plays to arcade style. Luckily, you aren't an FPS gamer (Or so I think) so you wouldn't compare this to other games."
So, the competition in CoD is what makes it entertaining.
Then compared to Starcraft, it's nowhere competitive, still CoD players might think:
Fucking nerds game.
Until they play it, that is ^^.

But you need to do so much in SC, it's boring. I haven't play it regularly for 6 months now.

You didn't respond to that many of my arguments. I'm saddened :/

 

[StoPCampinGn00b]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q8znjqjdA2I&list=PLLpjKzWIuEfmHcyTF7Qxuh1gIZoF3pxWS

So many CoD haters O:


EDIT: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wx3cYpGGmkk Lol the video is smacking the franchise in the face, read one of the quotes.

 

[chobibo]

I'm not sure, but I don't think jondrean was asking about the CoD haters, the question he was asking is that if you enjoy the game, and maybe add some argument as to why you do enjoy a game he finds sick.

@jondrean looks like the ignore topic at hand is being played here dude.

MoAr: I loved CoD because I liked things about World War II, but I haven't played the current ones.

MoAr @ jondrean: lol he wants you to vent rage on that site he linked, I think he misunderstands your inquiries...

 

[Deleted member 219079]

stopcampingn00b:

It's your decision to play CoD, I can do nothing about it. I were still discussing about the entertainment in CoD, not hate.

 

[StoPCampinGn00b]

Okay.

 

[Deleted member 219079]

@jondrean looks like the ignore topic at hand is being played here dude.

I think so.

 

[GhostThruster]

halo > everything else > cod > halo 4

 

[Deleted member 219079]

I liked Halo: Reach a lot tbh, not the rest of Halos by that much :/ Halo 4's engine and mechanics doesn't feel like Halo, but hey, it was whole another studio making it.

 

[StoPCampinGn00b]

Hmm, I guess I'm really liking the Call of Duty (It's been a long time since I was impressed by this series). It's sad to see how people (who played it before) say it's so different (get used to the netcode/engine!) and "want a refund."

And yes Jondrean I ignored you because you taught me there is no point in arguing with you. Halo, I loved the earlier Halo's.

Speaking of other games, I wish Dice would show more progress on the new SWBF and Planet Side's plans for consoles.

 

[GhostThruster]

it don't even matter if cod ghosts is good or not. once destiny drops, itll be gone for good

 

[StoPCampinGn00b]

Once destiny drops? It looks like a nice game, in fact it's partnered with Call of Duty. But it will have fierce competition from Titanfall and Battlefield 4. Planet Side is also trying to find their path to glory.

 

[GhostThruster]

it's not partnered with cod. bf4 doesn't really hold up against either cod or halo in its current weakened state. personal opinion but titanfall seems overhyped, it's cod with mechs and more jumping. some people are praising at as the next best competitive shooter, but i honestly don't see the skill gap in dropping down huge robots whilst using guns with massive aim assist + <0.5 second kill times.

 

[StoPCampinGn00b]

Well, the Ghosts manual had a deal offering to buy Destiny. I know you thought that I was just saying that because the games are both Activision.

It's funny because, in small print(Is destiny Playstation exclusive?) it says something like: Halo is a registered trademark of Microsoft. Destiny is not. Halo and Destiny are a trademark of Bungie. Bungie is not affiliated with Microsoft.

@Jondrean That felt like a backstab. I thought I was defending FPS's (Call of Duty...) from a guy who doesn't understand shooters.

 

[Deleted member 219079]

Halo is not realistic, you're in space. And the atmosphere isn't realistic either. Also I guess I know what games I like better than you.

 

[StoPCampinGn00b]

Who told you Call of Duty is realistic? Seriously, it's even not aiming to even be realistic. I believe it's a game in it's genre that doesn't do well at all in "realism." It's funny because I see a large percentage of haters ranting about how the franchise is so "fake, arcady, and unrealistic."

I played Halo too, yeah It's cool that it's in space and you say it like you KNOW Halo is better than Call of a Duty. Opinions.

Yeah, I can't stay away from this thread because it goes against what I believe in. So, what are you trying to say here? I'm not saying I'm better than you, I'm stating my opinions and views of various things. The last line, I was definitely sharing what I thought, and it was not true as I can already tell. Rubbing it in my face that I don't know your thoughts and preferences. Well...

 

[Deleted member 219079]

What? How about answering my latter arguments? So CoD doesn't aim to be realistic? Right...

 

[StoPCampinGn00b]

So you would think the developers would change the game to not be a run and gun (Which most people see what Call of Duty is, you run, take the objective order, and shoot. Not realistic at all.)


Honestly, I'm lazy to answer later arguments. I'm just having fun playing Call of Duty at my house.


So to end it all, Call of Duty does not aim to be realistic. Your the first person that tells me Call of Duty tries to be realistic.

 

[chobibo]

Honestly, I'm lazy to answer later arguments. I'm just having fun playing Call of Duty at my house.

Yet you bothered to write a text wall about CoD haters...

 

[Deleted member 219079]

Reveal

This seems pretty realistic to me. If it doesn't to you and you don't bother answering the argument I've send to you, I'd appreciate if you just left this thread.

 

[StoPCampinGn00b]

You just wanted to win Jondrean
I'm pissed off right now because of "maphack" on WarCraft so I will be leaving this note.

Why did you make this thread? Just to have fun and attract arguments? Sure I got caught doing it, Chobibo said so. I know I look like an idiot taking your precious bait. But your an idiot too for just making people be fucking angry. I don't hate you, I just think that this whole thing is bullshit. A lot of times I don't know what I'm saying, but you poke fun at it with your sarcastic: I don't understand this. You don't see me jumping on a Halo thread with this tone. I don't care anymore.

So, goodbye.

 

[marko9]

If the fish move than its different.