BTNGrubby

[Greedy Procrastinator]

Grubbychad

 

[deepstrasz]

I are Gharnold! Get down!

 

[Thrall Zadeera]

A smirk worthy of legendary Leeroy Jenkins.

Orc version is a bit sad - maybe he takes orcs too serious

 

[raypack]

 

[Asuna Tichondrius]

LoL, Lord Grubby famous here too..!

 

[Jab1z]

hmm, inspiring...

 

[deepstrasz]

please explain. If you don't like it don't rate it please.

 

[raypack]

please explain. If you don't like it don't rate it please.

I don't like it, therefore I gave it a low rating.
Are we not allowed to give a rating on resources uploaded on this website unless they are something that we like and would give 5 stars to?
If that's so then my deepest apologies, I will never express my opinion on a resource on this website ever again unless it is an absolutely positive opinion.

 

[Jab1z]

I don't like it, therefore I gave it a low rating.
Are we not allowed to give a rating on resources uploaded on this website unless they are something that we like and would give 5 stars to?
If that's so then my deepest apologies, I will never express my opinion on a resource on this website ever again unless it is an absolutely positive opinion.

Well i mean you are right, but what he meant was that (from his perspective) he doesn't see any technical issues with the icons, that's why it was questionable to him, and to me as well (that why you would react in this way).

 

[stein123]

I don't like it, therefore I gave it a low rating.
Are we not allowed to give a rating on resources uploaded on this website unless they are something that we like and would give 5 stars to?
If that's so then my deepest apologies, I will never express my opinion on a resource on this website ever again unless it is an absolutely positive opinion.

People rate resources based on their quality, what's wrong with it's quality? the drawing, the painting, it's cnp or traced? it's ai?

 

[deepstrasz]

I don't like it, therefore I gave it a low rating.
Are we not allowed to give a rating on resources uploaded on this website unless they are something that we like and would give 5 stars to?
If that's so then my deepest apologies, I will never express my opinion on a resource on this website ever again unless it is an absolutely positive opinion.

Long story short: "But mah feelins." Medium version: "I wanna do what I wanna when I wanna cause I wanna."

 

[Bleeq]

I don't like it, therefore I gave it a low rating.
Are we not allowed to give a rating on resources uploaded on this website unless they are something that we like and would give 5 stars to?
If that's so then my deepest apologies, I will never express my opinion on a resource on this website ever again unless it is an absolutely positive opinion.

I think this site has a problem with rating things too highly in general. Or maybe just these days.

I personally don't rate a lot of things because It wouldn't be 5 stars and the author might have a breakdown/people get on my arse.
And I think it's fair enough for personal subjectivity to factor in. However I wouldn't rate something below 3 based on it "not vibing with me" alone if everything else about it was good.

For the record I'd rate my own stuff somewhat lower in most cases.

But at the very least an explanation for a low rating would be nice.

 

[Footman16]

I don't like it, therefore I gave it a low rating.
Are we not allowed to give a rating on resources uploaded on this website unless they are something that we like and would give 5 stars to?
If that's so then my deepest apologies, I will never express my opinion on a resource on this website ever again unless it is an absolutely positive opinion.

A low rating is fine, I think the issue is your comment gives no indication as to why you gave it a low rating. If you give no reason then the author cannot potentially update or improve their work.

 

[General Frank]

Long story short: "But mah feelins." Medium version: "I wanna do what I wanna when I wanna cause I wanna."

A low rating is fine, I think the issue is your comment gives no indication as to why you gave it a low rating. If you give no reason then the author cannot potentially update or improve their work.

Pretty much sums up the whole situation.

Don't get dishearten by a low rating @Scias . You are more helpful to the community than most people can you should not take any shit from people.

 

[Scias]

Pretty much sums up the whole situation.

Don't get dishearten by a low rating @Scias . You are more helpful to the community than most people can you should not take any shit from people.

Thanks for the encouragement, the rating doesn't really bother me, I did assume raypack just has a issue with Grubby, and Imo it isn't necessary to show your opinion of Grubby by rating an art piece, but it is what it is haha.
The resource got enough high ratings by now and it has a good score.

 

[MtegoHyena]

Hahaha Grubby! Amazing job!

 

[Jab1z]

Thanks for the encouragement, the rating doesn't really bother me, I did assume raypack just has a issue with Grubby, and Imo it isn't necessary to show your opinion of Grubby by rating an art piece, but it is what it is haha.
The resource got enough high ratings by now and it has a good score.

I just checked your resources, your amazing an that your an asset to this site. Keep it up <3

 

[Macielos]

Looks great. Now we need BTNArtosis, filled with eternal fury.

 

[raypack]

So my rating was removed by a moderator?
It's good to know freedom of speech does not exist on this website

 

[deepstrasz]

So my rating was removed by a moderator?
It's good to know freedom of speech does not exist on this website

=/=freedom of stupidity, especially willingly.

 

[General Frank]

So my rating was removed by a moderator?
It's good to know freedom of speech does not exist on this website

While I see that removing a rating without even talking to you beforehand or just on a whim is quite bad, you also did not really give any reason why you gave that rating and it seemed to most of us that you have some bad feelings about the subject. Giving a '' is just a stupid as using profanity or slurs in this situation.

Maybe all of us can learn something from this: Don't rate something with just stupid emojis and if you just don't like, but have nothing against the resource on itself and maybe for the mods and reviewers to actually communicate (I know, hard, if you don't have a spine) with the users and not just exercise power.

 

[deepstrasz]

Maybe all of us can learn something from this: Don't rate something with just stupid emojis and if you just don't like, but have nothing against the resource on itself and maybe for the mods and reviewers to actually communicate (I know, hard, if you don't have a spine) with the users and not just exercise power.

I think he's been given the reason why the rating was unfair before the removal happened. I guess a message directly reflecting this could have been posted at the time of removal although I wouldn't call the move spineless when a reason was hinted some posts before.

 

[Shar Dundred]

I care not for the person portrayed here (neither positively nor negatively, I just don't care), I care for the quality of the asset presented here.

And the artistic work from @Scias is top notch, there is no argument about that. Both here and in his other works.

 

[Footman16]

So my rating was removed by a moderator?
It's good to know freedom of speech does not exist on this website

"Freedom of speech."

You were told to add a reason for the low rating and you didn't, why should the resource receive a low rating just because you're unwilling to explain why or give critique/feedback? As stated before, low ratings are fine but you can't just give something one star for no reason, we both know that's not very fair.

Maybe all of us can learn something from this: Don't rate something with just stupid emojis and if you just don't like, but have nothing against the resource on itself and maybe for the mods and reviewers to actually communicate (I know, hard, if you don't have a spine) with the users and not just exercise power.

I did communicate earlier right here:

A low rating is fine, I think the issue is your comment gives no indication as to why you gave it a low rating. If you give no reason then the author cannot potentially update or improve their work.

The low rating with no explanation got reported, myself and others asked for an explanation of the rating; none was given so it was removed. Implying I or other members of staff are spineless I don't think is very nice or fair either when I think the situation is very clear cut. Why do they need a message saying "You're rating was removed because you gave no explanation" when that has already been made clear in the thread?

Either way, the situation is resolved and to summarise: low ratings are fine, but you should at least say why you're giving it a low rating, that is the whole reason a comment is required before you can rate a resource.

 

[General Frank]

Either way, the situation is resolved and to summarise: low ratings are fine, but you should at least say why you're giving it a low rating, that is the whole reason a comment is required before you can rate a resource.

Maybe there needs to be a minimum amount of characters, a.k.a. an actual reason to be able to rate?

 

[Bleeq]

"Pardon me boys, is that a BTNGrubby chad-jaw?" Yes, yes...Back in '39, it's even in black and white!

ed: it's quite a resemblance though, isn't it?

 

[Bleeq]

I forgot to rate, so here you go.

It's quite something that it resembles him so closely, even if it is rather flattering haha.