• Listen to a special audio message from Bill Roper to the Hive Workshop community (Bill is a former Vice President of Blizzard Entertainment, Producer, Designer, Musician, Voice Actor) 🔗Click here to hear his message!
  • Read Evilhog's interview with Gregory Alper, the original composer of the music for WarCraft: Orcs & Humans 🔗Click here to read the full interview.

BTNGrubby

This bundle is marked as pending. It has not been reviewed by a staff member yet.
Attempt at making a Grubby portrait in Warcraft 3 universe, gave him more of a macho look so he fits in with the rest of the knights and heroes.

A lot of trouble keeping the resemblance in the orc variation, so I simplified it and only changed the mouth of the human version
Contents

BTNGrubby (Icon)

BTNHeroGrubby (Icon)

BTNHeroOrcGrubby (Icon)

BTNOrcGrubby (Icon)

Level 28
Joined
Dec 3, 2020
Messages
994
please explain. If you don't like it don't rate it please.
I don't like it, therefore I gave it a low rating.
Are we not allowed to give a rating on resources uploaded on this website unless they are something that we like and would give 5 stars to?
If that's so then my deepest apologies, I will never express my opinion on a resource on this website ever again unless it is an absolutely positive opinion.
 
Level 34
Joined
Jan 17, 2019
Messages
364
I don't like it, therefore I gave it a low rating.
Are we not allowed to give a rating on resources uploaded on this website unless they are something that we like and would give 5 stars to?
If that's so then my deepest apologies, I will never express my opinion on a resource on this website ever again unless it is an absolutely positive opinion.
Well i mean you are right, but what he meant was that (from his perspective) he doesn't see any technical issues with the icons, that's why it was questionable to him, and to me as well (that why you would react in this way).
 
Level 38
Joined
Sep 17, 2010
Messages
2,882
I don't like it, therefore I gave it a low rating.
Are we not allowed to give a rating on resources uploaded on this website unless they are something that we like and would give 5 stars to?
If that's so then my deepest apologies, I will never express my opinion on a resource on this website ever again unless it is an absolutely positive opinion.
People rate resources based on their quality, what's wrong with it's quality? the drawing, the painting, it's cnp or traced? it's ai?
 

deepstrasz

Map Reviewer
Level 75
Joined
Jun 4, 2009
Messages
20,288
I don't like it, therefore I gave it a low rating.
Are we not allowed to give a rating on resources uploaded on this website unless they are something that we like and would give 5 stars to?
If that's so then my deepest apologies, I will never express my opinion on a resource on this website ever again unless it is an absolutely positive opinion.
Long story short: "But mah feelins." Medium version: "I wanna do what I wanna when I wanna cause I wanna."
 
Level 30
Joined
Jun 4, 2023
Messages
422
I don't like it, therefore I gave it a low rating.
Are we not allowed to give a rating on resources uploaded on this website unless they are something that we like and would give 5 stars to?
If that's so then my deepest apologies, I will never express my opinion on a resource on this website ever again unless it is an absolutely positive opinion.
I think this site has a problem with rating things too highly in general. Or maybe just these days.

I personally don't rate a lot of things because It wouldn't be 5 stars and the author might have a breakdown/people get on my arse.
And I think it's fair enough for personal subjectivity to factor in. However I wouldn't rate something below 3 based on it "not vibing with me" alone if everything else about it was good.

For the record I'd rate my own stuff somewhat lower in most cases.

But at the very least an explanation for a low rating would be nice.
 
I don't like it, therefore I gave it a low rating.
Are we not allowed to give a rating on resources uploaded on this website unless they are something that we like and would give 5 stars to?
If that's so then my deepest apologies, I will never express my opinion on a resource on this website ever again unless it is an absolutely positive opinion.
A low rating is fine, I think the issue is your comment gives no indication as to why you gave it a low rating. If you give no reason then the author cannot potentially update or improve their work.
 
Long story short: "But mah feelins." Medium version: "I wanna do what I wanna when I wanna cause I wanna."
A low rating is fine, I think the issue is your comment gives no indication as to why you gave it a low rating. If you give no reason then the author cannot potentially update or improve their work.
Pretty much sums up the whole situation.

Don't get dishearten by a low rating @Scias . You are more helpful to the community than most people can you should not take any shit from people.
 
Level 34
Joined
Jan 6, 2017
Messages
449
Pretty much sums up the whole situation.

Don't get dishearten by a low rating @Scias . You are more helpful to the community than most people can you should not take any shit from people.
Thanks for the encouragement, the rating doesn't really bother me, I did assume raypack just has a issue with Grubby, and Imo it isn't necessary to show your opinion of Grubby by rating an art piece, but it is what it is haha.
The resource got enough high ratings by now and it has a good score.
 
Level 34
Joined
Jan 17, 2019
Messages
364
Thanks for the encouragement, the rating doesn't really bother me, I did assume raypack just has a issue with Grubby, and Imo it isn't necessary to show your opinion of Grubby by rating an art piece, but it is what it is haha.
The resource got enough high ratings by now and it has a good score.
I just checked your resources, your amazing an that your an asset to this site. Keep it up <3
 
So my rating was removed by a moderator?
It's good to know freedom of speech does not exist on this website 👍
While I see that removing a rating without even talking to you beforehand or just on a whim is quite bad, you also did not really give any reason why you gave that rating and it seemed to most of us that you have some bad feelings about the subject. Giving a ':thumbs_down:' is just a stupid as using profanity or slurs in this situation.

Maybe all of us can learn something from this: Don't rate something with just stupid emojis and if you just don't like, but have nothing against the resource on itself and maybe for the mods and reviewers to actually communicate (I know, hard, if you don't have a spine) with the users and not just exercise power.
 

deepstrasz

Map Reviewer
Level 75
Joined
Jun 4, 2009
Messages
20,288
Maybe all of us can learn something from this: Don't rate something with just stupid emojis and if you just don't like, but have nothing against the resource on itself and maybe for the mods and reviewers to actually communicate (I know, hard, if you don't have a spine) with the users and not just exercise power.
I think he's been given the reason why the rating was unfair before the removal happened. I guess a message directly reflecting this could have been posted at the time of removal although I wouldn't call the move spineless when a reason was hinted some posts before.
 
So my rating was removed by a moderator?
It's good to know freedom of speech does not exist on this website 👍
"Freedom of speech."

You were told to add a reason for the low rating and you didn't, why should the resource receive a low rating just because you're unwilling to explain why or give critique/feedback? As stated before, low ratings are fine but you can't just give something one star for no reason, we both know that's not very fair.

Maybe all of us can learn something from this: Don't rate something with just stupid emojis and if you just don't like, but have nothing against the resource on itself and maybe for the mods and reviewers to actually communicate (I know, hard, if you don't have a spine) with the users and not just exercise power.
I did communicate earlier right here:
A low rating is fine, I think the issue is your comment gives no indication as to why you gave it a low rating. If you give no reason then the author cannot potentially update or improve their work.
The low rating with no explanation got reported, myself and others asked for an explanation of the rating; none was given so it was removed. Implying I or other members of staff are spineless I don't think is very nice or fair either when I think the situation is very clear cut. Why do they need a message saying "You're rating was removed because you gave no explanation" when that has already been made clear in the thread?

Either way, the situation is resolved and to summarise: low ratings are fine, but you should at least say why you're giving it a low rating, that is the whole reason a comment is required before you can rate a resource.
 
Either way, the situation is resolved and to summarise: low ratings are fine, but you should at least say why you're giving it a low rating, that is the whole reason a comment is required before you can rate a resource.
Maybe there needs to be a minimum amount of characters, a.k.a. an actual reason to be able to rate? 🤔
 
Top